POST
|
The default for membership_access is "none", which permits membership from any organization. That is not compatible with a Shared Update group (i.e., with users_update_items set to True), hence the error you are seeing. To address the issue, add the membership_access parameter to your call to create_group, explicitly setting it to "org" or "collaboration", as appropriate for your needs.
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
1
|
150
|
POST
|
@AndrewHankinson using gis.content.search with the query parameter to search for categories can be a challenge, as it is a fuzzy search. If you have two categories set up, "Category 1" and "Category 2", then you need to be explicit with quotes. For example, items = gis.content.search(query = 'categories:"Category Test"') will not return the same results as: items = gis.content.search(query='categories:Category Test') The first looks for any items with a category that contains "Category Test", while the latter's query terms are interpreted as "categories:Category" AND "Test", so it will return any items that contain "Category" in their category AND contain "Test" in their name, description, summary, etc. Sometimes the fuzziness of querying for categories can be useful. For example, maybe you want to search for any category that contains "Test", with a query value of 'categories:Test'. If you are interested in searching explicitly for Category names, however, then I would recommend using the categories parameter instead. For example: items = gis.content.search(query = '', categories="/Categories/Category 1") will return only items that have "/Categories/Category 1" as a category.
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
0
|
80
|
POST
|
It looks like you have a space in the name of the category for which you are searching, 'Category name'. You likely need to enclose it in quotes when creating your query to ensure it behaves as you expect.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
148
|
IDEA
|
See also Allow Organization and/or Groups to own data in AGOL and Enterprise and Groups Support for "Collaboration of Equals".
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
600
|
IDEA
|
As an additional point of clarification here, when credit budgeting tools are not enabled, there is NO CAP on consuming credits in an organization. As a result, you can unexpectedly end up with a massive negative balance of credits and owning a lot of money. Esri should prevent this by capping use at a reasonable level, even when credit budgeting tools are not enabled.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
43
|
IDEA
|
@George_Thompson Unfortunately the notebook you reference is only meant for small organizations. It does not scale suitably for large organizations. For example, it is not setup to handle an Online organization with more than 10,000 users. It also recommends a maximum historical time range of 30 days, and what this Idea is about is having access to a much longer time range. This idea is also about having Esri do the heavy-lifting and deliver a robust solution, rather than each organization having to setup their own fragile system to start collecting the information and reporting on it.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
273
|
POST
|
For directions on how to recover deleted features, when "Keep track of changes to the data (add, update, delete features)" is enabled on a hosted feature layer, see the recently published How-To: Recover deleted features from a hosted feature layer using ExtractChanges
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
287
|
IDEA
|
See also this Idea: Add Historical Tracking of ArcGIS Online Named Users to View Status Under My Organization
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
367
|
IDEA
|
In order to develop an understanding of how one’s organization is using ArcGIS Online, and forecast future needs for growth, one needs a historical record of metrics for users, credits, storage, licensing, etc. The current dashboards within the system offer some of this information, however, only on short time-scales, too short to be useful for prediction and planning purposes. For example, the current Feature Data Store dashboard only shows a current snapshot of storage use, and only up to a week of resource usage (Organization → Overview → Feature Data Store.) The Status dashboards only offer up to 1-year, however, for large organizations, you don’t even get that, as they fail to display results for longer time period options. The various administrative reports provide a daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly snapshot of such information. It is left to organization admins, however, to compile the data from scheduled, repeated reports into a meaningful historical record on their own. I would like to see dashboards directly in ArcGIS Online that offer historical views for key indicators. They should offer at least several years of history, if not more, so that forecasting is more reliable. From the reports, some of the key indicators that we would like to see tracked in such dashboards, on a daily, weekly, and/or monthly basis, include: Total number of Named Users Count of Logins per day, per week, per month Total size of Feature Storage Total size of File Storage Size of Feature/File Storage per item type Feature Data Store resource usage metrics reflective of potentially poor user experience system-wide, such as a count of periods of three-minutes or longer during which the load is pegged at 100%. Total credit consumption per day, week, month Credit consumption per category per day, week, month Counts of licenses and user types assigned These dashboards could be something along the lines of what we have had to produce ourselves using the admin reports, Python scripting, and Dashboards: User Dashboard Storage Dashboard Credit Dashboard Item Dashboard In our approach, we take data the admin reports are extracting from ArcGIS Online, and publishing it back to Online, so that we can use it as data sources in ArcGIS Dashboards. It would be nice (and simpler) if the data going into the reports was surfaced in ArcGIS Online in a way where we could directly make such Dashboards. I'm sure we are not the only ones making historical dashboards like this to help with system planning (as well as demonstrating usage.) As such, it would save us all a lot of time from building these each on our own, if Esri provided them as part of ArcGIS Online.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
14
|
6
|
371
|
POST
|
Regarding setting the color of column/bar charts in the Analyze tab, please see the Idea, Add color options for analyze tab's column and bar charts.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
57
|
IDEA
|
It would be helpful to have some very basic color options available for the column and bar charts displayed under the Analyze tab, such as the ability to choose a single-color for all of the columns/bars in a chart or to be able to specify the color used for each individual column/bar. For example, if a question's answers are a color, it is currently confusing -- and potentially misleading -- when the chart displays the names of colors with symbols that do not match those colors, as in the following example: Being able to set the individual column/bar colors manually, or being able to choose to use a single color for all of the columns/bars in the chart, would help avoid those problems.
... View more
a month ago
|
2
|
1
|
194
|
IDEA
|
@JosephHilliard94 once you enter enough text, Field Maps automatically wraps to a new line, and expands the height of the text box to accommodate it. That auto-resizing of the box's height will not happen with a single line text box. Is the Idea here that the Text - Multiline should appear different initially, so as to give the field worker a visual indication that sets an expectation that they need to enter more than just one line of text for such a field? Is that what you mean by "make life easier"?
... View more
09-04-2025
07:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
284
|
IDEA
|
One possible adjustment to your workaround, if you don't mind the format, is to use the YYYY-MM-DD format for your dates, for which alphabetic sorting is equivalent to the desired date sort order.
... View more
08-20-2025
05:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
214
|
IDEA
|
Have tried a Table with Grouped Values? It supports generating a unique or distinct value list, which can be used to filter other compatible elements. You can use advanced formatting to hide fields you don't want displayed in the list, but wish to retain for filtering purposes. See this post for a nice example, Dashboards That Pop: Unique Lists.
... View more
08-20-2025
05:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
205
|
IDEA
|
Currently, if a user is a given a role with the Administrative privilege:Groups:Reassign ownership, then they can re-assign ownership of any group that is visible to them, regardless of whether they own the group or not. For example, if a group is shared publicly or with the organization, then any other member of the organization can see the group, and has access to the Change owner capability for that group, even if they are not the owner of, or a manager for, the group. We have over 12,000 users in our organization, and our user-base turns over relatively frequently as an academic institution. This means it does not scale to have users reaching out to administrators each time a group needs its ownership changed when someone is leaving the organization. User need to be able to take care of this themselves. Therefore, it would be helpful if we could empower users to change ownership of their groups themselves. We do not, however, want the current situation where giving them the existing privilege enables them to change the ownership of any group in the organization that is visible to them Ideally there would be a non-Administrative privilege that would enable users to be able to reassign a group's ownership only if they are the owner or a manager of the group.
... View more
08-18-2025
12:29 PM
|
2
|
0
|
127
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | a week ago | |
1 | a week ago | |
14 | 4 weeks ago | |
2 | a month ago | |
1 | 08-31-2022 02:25 PM |
Online Status |
Online
|
Date Last Visited |
a minute ago
|