|
IDEA
|
I understand Esri's position is that allowing a regular group to be changed to a Shared Update group, after creation, would violate users' trust. They joined or were added to a group to which they may have shared items, which would be read-only in a regular group. Changing the group to a Shared Update group would "unexpectedly" result in such items becoming editable. Accepting that position, are there ways could Esri still support the ability to change a regular group to a Shared Update group, without "surprising" users? Our use cases, and I suspect many others, do typically come about because someone has added content to a group, and realized after the fact they need this unexpected thing called a "Shared Update" group to enable the kind of collaboration they need. So all the members want the group type changed. Perhaps Esri could implement a workflow to that would enable changing a regular group to a Shared Update one: Such a change could send a notification to all members of the group. If they didn't want to be part of the group at that point, or want to share their own content with the group, then they could leave the group or un-share their content from the group. Such a change could be initiated, but only completed after all existing members had acknowledged they were okay with the change? Provide a way to duplicate a regular group to a Shared Update group, minus the shared content. and other options I'm sure creative folks can think up...
... View more
03-13-2026
08:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
367
|
|
IDEA
|
@JeffShaner, if we need a quick fix, is it correct to add the missing typeKeyword of "FieldMapsDisabled" to PDF items created prior to the ArcGIS OnlineFeb 2026 update, and which do not currently have the typeKeyword of "Geospatial PDF"? Thanks.
... View more
03-08-2026
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
534
|
|
POST
|
@AaronKoelker you can find the full list of available user types for your organization, including counts by examining: gis.properties.subscriptionInfo.userLicenseTypes It is not a definitive list of all possible User Types though. Only the ones available to you in your subscription, including ones that have not been assigned to any account yet. I too would like to see the documentation updated (and kept up-to-date) with an authoritative list of all possible User Types.
... View more
03-06-2026
09:28 AM
|
1
|
1
|
469
|
|
IDEA
|
@NairiSevajian a use-case that comes to mind for me is when a user is viewing content in a folder for a project, and they want to remind themselves of its structure and contents, or understand the structure and contents that were someone else's choice. Viewing all of the content at once -- the whole picture -- organized by type, can make it easier to see an inferred structure, with the Experiences, Instant Apps, Web Maps, Hosted Feature Layers, etc. that make up the project sorted next to each other. Yes, filtering could be used to do something similar, however, they key for this use case is being able to see all of the content at once. Filtering only allows you to view a single item type at a time. Filtering is great when you have a use case with a singular need to view objects from one category, and when reducing a view of many objects to something manageable. Sorting, however, is a better fit when one needs to view a reasonably-sized collection of objects in its entirety, organized by categories.
... View more
02-28-2026
08:51 AM
|
0
|
0
|
329
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be helpful to have some way to easily see what changes have been made in a draft story, as compared to the published version. Particularly in cases where a series of edits over time are required, before you publish the updated story. One could view the draft and published versions of a story side-by-side in two browser tabs, however, it is easy to overlook differences that way, especially if they are minor changes. Something like a compare or diff tool that would visually highlight the differences is desired. It would help one to identify blocks that had been added, deleted, or edited since the story was last published. Use cases: A group collaboratively authoring a StoryMap. They currently have to use a Shared Update group to achieve this goal, and ensure they have a way to coordinate who is authoring the story when, so that they don't run the risk of overwriting each other's edits. When it is one of the collaborators turns to edit the story, they may have forgotten what changes they have already made, and want to see what those are. Or, they may want to see what other changes have been made by other collaborators in other parts of the story since it was last published. If you are sporadically working on updating a story, or are juggling a lot of other tasks in ArcGIS, it can be difficult to remember where you left off editing story. In which case it would be helpful to remind yourself of what changes you have already made, which haven't been published yet. When an administrator is helping someone troubleshoot issues with their StoryMap, it can be helpful to identify what changes exist in the draft versus published versions, potentially narrowing down the source of a problem.
... View more
02-19-2026
08:55 AM
|
4
|
0
|
237
|
|
IDEA
|
Shared ownership by multiple people also helps avoid issues when one person leaves, and any content owned, even though shared to groups, is deleted. It would be helpful if they were simply removed as an owner and the remaining users (or the group itself) continued "owning" the content.
... View more
02-06-2026
12:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
258
|
|
IDEA
|
In our ArcGIS Online organization most people need to work collaboratively with others in the system, hence, we need all of our users to be able to create Shared Update groups from the start. Please make it possible to assign the privilege of "Create with update capabilities" to a custom role, so that we can grant it to our users through New member defaults. Currently, if that privilege is assigned to a custom role, then you are unable to select that role for use with New member defaults. Manually re-assigning users to a custom role with that privilege, after their account is created, is not a scalable task for our administrators. (There are scripting workarounds, however, that is not a feasible solution for all organizations.) [This Idea originates from comments on Make ‘create group with update capabilities’ a non-admin privilege, and I am posting it as its own Idea for increased, clearer awareness @JeffShaw @AmyWork3 @ReinaCMurray @PatIampietro @ColeWhite]
... View more
01-16-2026
09:58 AM
|
8
|
0
|
337
|
|
BLOG
|
If you find the concept of making it easier for users to view their use of Feature Storage worthwhile, also consider kudo-ing the ArcGIS Online Idea, Clearly display the Feature Storage size for hosted items to users.
... View more
01-16-2026
06:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
171
|
|
IDEA
|
Currently people viewing the Item details for a hosted item see a Size and an Attachments size. To determine the amount of Feature Storage the item uses, they have to subtract the Attachments size from the Size. As Feature Storage consumption is typically a significant expense for an ArcGIS Online organization, users need better insight into their use of Feature Storage, in order to be good stewards of their organization's resources. This Idea proposes eliminating the need to do math to determine an item's Feature size. One could add a Feature size entry to the Item details page; or, replace Size with Feature size. It would be even more helpful if Feature Size was a column in the Content view, which would be sortable, to assist users with evaluating their hosted items consuming the most Feature Storage.
... View more
01-15-2026
09:15 AM
|
21
|
1
|
432
|
|
IDEA
|
Our current workaround is to provide a person with multiple Named User identities. This comes with its own challenges, however, as users need to keep close track of which identity they are using to login where.
... View more
01-13-2026
05:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1157
|
|
POST
|
In the context of ArcGIS Online, the terms "feature layer (hosted)" and "feature layer collection" are equivalent. The former is typically used in user-facing contexts, like the documentation and user-interface, while the latter usually appears in systems administration and programmatic contexts. Both are generally synonymous with "feature service" too. A "feature collection" is different. It is a sub-type of "feature layer", supporting a specific, limited set of functionality (see Feature collections.) For example, when you save a route from Map Viewer, it is stored as a "feature collection", and in the Online interfaced, it is listed as a "Route layer" with a source of "Feature collection".
... View more
01-10-2026
07:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
586
|
|
BLOG
|
One of the challenges to fostering good data stewardship practices in ArcGIS Online -- in Higher-Education organizations in particular -- is the lack of insight users have into their own Feature Storage use. As a workaround, one can provide users with a Dashboard for monitoring their use of Feature Storage: Building such a Dashboard as an ArcGIS Online administrator, and the workflow that supports it, is described in the StoryMap: Empowered Data Stewardship: Enable users to monitor their Feature Storage use.
... View more
01-05-2026
08:59 AM
|
6
|
1
|
538
|
|
IDEA
|
FYI, it looks like a recent release of the ArcGIS API for Python (perhaps 2.4.2?) removed the problematic warning about a user being logged in with an administrator role, when all the user has is the privilege for creating Shared Update groups. The warning is no longer present in the latest ArcGIS Online Notebook runtime (version 12) from the October 2025 update.
... View more
01-05-2026
07:18 AM
|
0
|
0
|
258
|
|
IDEA
|
Please update the StoryMap documentation that covers the "Allow duplication" setting and "Duplicate story" feature to explicitly note the latter is not supported with Public ArcGIS Online accounts. For example, on the documentation page Publish a story or briefing, in the section discussing the "Allow duplication" setting, please add a note indicating that duplication of a story by a Public Account user is not supported. It currently states, "Use the Allow duplication check box to provide ArcGIS users with access to the story to duplicate the item", however, that is not true for Public accounts, which can access the story, but are unable to duplicate it.
... View more
12-19-2025
09:50 AM
|
0
|
1
|
528
|
|
IDEA
|
Another use case of confusion and lack of functionality resulting from having a separate ArcGIS StoryMaps landing page. If a user goes directly to https://storymaps.arcgis.com, then when they login successfully they do not see the ArcGIS Online Information Banner message. At the end of each semester we need to encourage graduating students to do something proactively with their ArcGIS Online content. We do send an email notification out four weeks before the end of the semester; however, emails are often ignored. So we also add a note to the Information Banner four weeks prior to the end of the semester, and remove it at the end of the semester. That can be ignored as well, though the more channels we use to reach our people, the better our chance of success. The separate ArcGIS StoryMaps landing page does not display the ArcGIS Online Information banner. Instead it has its own message banner over which administrators have no control. (Right now it is showing a message about Classic Esri StoryMaps retiring, which is not helpful in our organization, as we have already addressed that.) (The same problem with not displaying the Information Banner exists with other siloed products that are supposed to be part of ArcGIS Online, such as https://experience.arcgis.com/ and https://survey123.arcgis.com/.)
... View more
11-21-2025
05:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
388
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 09-11-2025 05:49 PM | |
| 1 | 03-06-2026 09:28 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
7 hours ago
|