|
BLOG
|
Tile Package Kreator Tile Package Kreator - the desktop utility used for the easy creation of Tile Packages (i.e. local basemaps that you can take offline in Survey123 for ArcGIS, Collector for ArcGIS and ArcGIS Runtime apps) has just been updated! Version 1.2 comes complete with a number of enhancements that will make the app easier and more intuitive to use. To find out how to use it - please see the following blog: https://community.esri.com/groups/survey123/blog/2017/01/31/taking-your-maps-offline-with-tile-package-creator. Esri Labs projects are developed by Esri employees and are inspired by our interactions with ArcGIS users like you. Esri Labs projects are free to use but are not official Esri products. These projects do not go through the rigorous software development cycle so they are not holistically tested, documented or supported by Esri technical support. But for now let’s run through what’s new: New functionality You can now navigate to your desired location using a place name or address, and once there, you can draw polygons (as well as squares and polylines) to define your export extent. If you want to revisit the extent at later date, you can now save these drawn extents as spatial bookmarks (which can be exported to geojson too). TPK 1.2 will also enable you to interactively define the range of zoom levels you want to export – so if you want to export for example levels 4-12, this is now possible. Improvements To make life easier, you can now switch tile services/basemaps without having to return to the gallery, and any public tiled service that you added to app will be persisted (so no need to keep re-entering them). There have also been a number of bug fixes related to the UI and file management. If you want to get your hands on the latest version of the app – please visit here: ArcGIS Marketplace The latest version of the guide can be downloaded here: Guide
... View more
07-27-2017
08:14 PM
|
1
|
0
|
792
|
|
POST
|
Hi - I will take a look at the form and get back to you. But in the mean time - yes you can point the new form to the existing service. To do this you need to use the submission_url in the settings page of the new survey and update it with the url of the service. For more information on this see: Author a survey that matches a feature service Use Survey123 with existing feature services—Survey123 for ArcGIS | ArcGIS
... View more
07-27-2017
06:44 AM
|
0
|
2
|
3743
|
|
POST
|
Hi Stefano - just to follow up on this. I was not able to replicate the behaviour with you survey running on my Android 7.1 device. Are you still experiencing the problem on the latest version of Survey123 (2.3)?
... View more
07-24-2017
07:59 PM
|
0
|
1
|
912
|
|
POST
|
Hi Preston If you have an existing feature service that has domains - you can use Connect to create a survey from the service. As part of the process, connect will create questions from the field names and choice lists from the domains. You can then modify the survey to meet your needs (e.g. delete and reorder questions, apply appearances etc). For more information on this process, please see: Use Survey123 with existing feature services—Survey123 for ArcGIS | ArcGIS
... View more
07-24-2017
05:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
539
|
|
POST
|
Hi Dan - Can you confirm whether the form has an external select in it? Also can you upload the survey? Thanks John
... View more
07-24-2017
04:57 PM
|
0
|
4
|
3743
|
|
POST
|
There were a couple of issues with the 2.3 API regarding pull data on geopoint and external selects. These have now been resolved on our QA system, and once we make the updates to production, the issue will be resolved. Please retest your survey again.
... View more
07-24-2017
05:27 AM
|
0
|
1
|
825
|
|
POST
|
Hi Braden. We are still looking into the crash issue and will incorporate your feedback. These crash issues are tricky to reproduce and troubleshoot, so please bear with us. Thanks for all your feedback.
... View more
07-24-2017
05:18 AM
|
2
|
1
|
2377
|
|
POST
|
Hi Wendy - Sorry, we don't have a date for this yet. But will update GeoNet when we do.
... View more
07-24-2017
03:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
856
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the information - we are still working on a solution for this and will update this post when we do.
... View more
07-24-2017
03:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2734
|
|
POST
|
Hi Stefano If you want to get access to Compact (and other newer tags) on the template used when creating a survey from an existing feature service - you must ensure that the following file is deleted before you install a new version of Connect: XLSFormTemplate.xlsx In Windows you can find the file here: C:\users\XXX\AppData\Local\Temp Currently the app will not overwrite the template with the newer one contained in the installer (we will fix this).
... View more
07-23-2017
09:25 PM
|
1
|
0
|
779
|
|
POST
|
Hi Christopher This issue has been partially fixed in that signatures are not cropped on submission of a survey. However there is still a bug where the signatures are cropped on re-load (e.g. re-opening a survey from drafts or the sent box) and sending. We have a fix for this other issue and intend to make it available in the next release.
... View more
07-23-2017
09:18 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1635
|
|
POST
|
HI Cory Because the select_multiple actually returns a string, any alternative approach would require you extracting the numbers from the string (and then getting the min/max), and would still require a number of if statements to achieve what you are trying to do. So to answer your question - there is not an easier way to do this. Thanks John
... View more
07-17-2017
08:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
875
|
|
POST
|
Hi Cory Select_multiple (or select_one) questions do not support calculations of any type. So it is not possible to use min or max in the way that you outlined. We can get this added as an enhancement request though. Thanks John
... View more
07-16-2017
05:26 AM
|
1
|
2
|
875
|
|
POST
|
Hi Stefano I can confirm that using today() in a calculation in combination with required should work. Are you able to share your survey and also let me know what operating system you are running the app on? Thanks John
... View more
07-16-2017
05:08 AM
|
0
|
3
|
912
|
|
POST
|
Hi - There are two ways that you can approach this: 1) You can create a feature service with a related table. The main feature layer representing the asset, and the table representing the inspections. This enables you to have many inspections collected against the one asset/feature. You can then set up a survey that points directly to the the related table (using the form_id in the settings, to specify the table you want to target) - so you can start adding inspections directly to the inspections table. 2) You can use the inbox functionality to edit or update existing features/assets. In this workflow you could configure the inbox where clause to download and edit features with a particular attribute value (e.g. a status of 'For Review') or with a particular edited date (e.g before 1/03/2017). Please let me know if you need any further information on either of these approaches.
... View more
07-14-2017
06:37 PM
|
0
|
2
|
837
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 11-14-2024 07:12 PM | |
| 1 | 03-25-2025 03:08 PM | |
| 1 | 04-30-2024 04:53 PM | |
| 1 | 01-28-2025 06:30 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|