|
DOC
|
@GillesLavandier did you ever get this working in 10.9.1?
... View more
07-27-2022
12:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4254
|
|
POST
|
I was curious if anyone has any recommendation for a configuration of Gas meter banks in the Gas Utility Network. We have situations where we have one service line that has multiple meters on it (ex. apartments). So we would need all those meters associated to that one line. Right now we can snap one meter to the end of the line, but are stuck after that. In the electric network we put a Junction line end at the end of the service line at z=0 and then the rest of the meters we changed the z values. Then we did a junction to junction association between the line end and the meters so the subnetwork would propagate to all the meters. In Gas I'm not even seeing any Junction to Junction rules set up for Customer Meters or possibly any junctions that make sense to use to add a rule.
... View more
07-21-2022
02:16 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2631
|
|
POST
|
My pop up issues are still persistent even with creating the pop ups through Pro prior to publishing the service. I have a ticket into tech support to hopefully isolate the problem.
... View more
07-06-2022
01:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1136
|
|
POST
|
I have multiple UN Networks deployed (water, sewer, electric) with development and production version of both. We upgraded to Enterprise 10.9.1 from 10.8.1 and now I'm experiencing a weird issue with my attribute rules that is causing error upon creation of devices and junctions in my Water Production. In all my "working" deployments the attribute rules that reference the Water line converts the datastore name to L515Water_Line from the SDE database name when viewing it as the published service via Pro. However, in my Water Production that conversion doesn't happen and it continues to reference the direct SDE connection name which gives me an arcade error message when inserting the line because it can't see the SDE connection. See the screenshots below one is of my working water development and one is from the non-working working production. Besides the upgrade from 10.9.1 to 10.8.1 nothing else changed. It it is working on 5 of the 6 deployments. Why on this one does it not update to the service layer name. I tried publishing the project as a brand new feature service and got the same result. I did find a workaround that if I check the "exclude from application evaluation" than it bypasses it and allows me to create items. But this wasn't checked with the default schema and I'm hesitant to leave it that way.
... View more
05-25-2022
12:49 PM
|
0
|
1
|
677
|
|
POST
|
Yes, enterprise going from 10.8.1 to 10.9.1 and v4 to v5. I have branched versioning and I have 2,858 records in my Electric Assembly.
... View more
05-24-2022
06:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
544
|
|
POST
|
The Pop Ups are being created within the Web Map in Portal. I don't create any in Pro prior to publishing the service. We are upgrading to 10.9.1 this weekend so it will be interesting to see if anything changes. It is just weird that some of the pop ups work on some don't on the same service and it is only in Field Maps.
... View more
05-20-2022
06:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1181
|
|
POST
|
I have a weird issue with my Utility Networks. I have a View only MapServer service created of my utility network that I'm using for some special symbology and view only maps. I have the MapServer service added to a Web Map in Portal with popups for Devices, Junctions, and Lines and then created a Web App Builder Web Map off that web map. All popups are working correctly in the Web Map and through Web App Builder Map. I then made the same web map available through Field Maps so my field users who are use to navigating maps in the app can do so within Field maps instead of leaving the program and going to a different site. The weird issue I'm coming across is not all my popups are working in Field Maps. With the testing I have done it is Devices layer having the issues as I can click and get the attribute data for all lines and junctions that I have tested. But on the device layer some devices show the popup but not others. For example in the Water UN if I click the hydrants device I can see the attribute data that I defined for the popup via field maps and the web map in portal and Web App Builder, but if I click the Device/Controllable Values, it will never select to display the attribute data in Field Maps but it works and displays the data in WebApp Builder and the Portal Web Map. I have Water, Sewer, and Electric UNs deployed and having this issue with all three UNs. Anyone have the same issue or any ideas of the cause. My Environment is: Enterprise and Portal 10.8.1 UN Version 4 Field Maps Version 22.1.0
... View more
05-17-2022
01:53 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1280
|
|
DOC
|
@RobertScheitlin__GISP That did the trick on apostrophes. Thanks for the quick fix on that. For the CSV. I looked again since you said it is there and I must have looked over that a million times for that check box. Found it and works perfectly. Thanks!
... View more
05-11-2022
11:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
13726
|
|
DOC
|
Robert, We are using your search widget for Subdivisions, Parcels, etc. Some of our Subdivisions have apostrophes in the name and when doing the search if the apostrophe is included the search fails. I'm guessing it has something to do with it being a symbol making the search error out, but I just wanted to double check to see if that is case or something else. Also, you have the ability to Save the results to My Content. Have you ever thought about putting in an option to save to CSV (like the attribute table does)? Thinking for maps that are shared to everyone and being used by the public or staff with no login credentials.
... View more
05-11-2022
09:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
13745
|
|
IDEA
|
I agree having the ability to do a split in Field Maps would save a lot of work between Field crews and office crews. We sometimes have part of a line on a service replaced so they either have to drawn in a brand new line so the entire lines attributes are not updated or call into the office and tell us where to split it and then they can update the attributes on the appropriate section. If they could just split right in the field and update accordingly it would be a huge timesaver.
... View more
05-06-2022
12:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3133
|
|
IDEA
|
Your working on this for ArcGIS Online, what about the people using Portal?
... View more
05-06-2022
11:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5151
|
|
POST
|
It doesn't seem this post is getting much traction from ESRI, so I added it in the Ideas area. Go give it some Kudos to push ESRI to bring this back! https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/bring-back-the-over-zoom-basemap-capability/idi-p/1169728/jump-to/first-unread-message
... View more
05-02-2022
08:43 AM
|
2
|
0
|
7079
|
|
IDEA
|
Our base maps via Field Maps use to zoom PAST the cached layers defined scales up until a few weeks ago. I'm thinking some sort of update changed something. I opened up the exact same map in Collector and we can still zoom in past the extent of defined scales. This is new to Field Maps! We need this capability back!!! We are using a GPS with field maps and sometimes we need to zoom far in to see points that they GPS that are within 5 feet of each other. Having the aerial basemap disappear on them is making it difficult for them to do their job.
... View more
05-02-2022
08:34 AM
|
40
|
17
|
7029
|
|
POST
|
I want to follow up on this. Our base maps via Field Maps use to zoom PAST the cached layers defined scales up until a few weeks ago. I'm thinking some sort of update changed something. I opened up the exact same map in Collector and we can still zoom in past the extent of defined scales. This is new to Field Maps! How do I get this back? If this setting was removed from Field Maps then I think it needs to come back. We are using a GPS with field maps and sometimes we need to zoom far in to see points that they GPS that are within 5 feet of each other. Having the aerial basemap disappear on them is making it difficult for them to do their job.
... View more
04-19-2022
09:00 AM
|
6
|
2
|
7179
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 03-20-2025 12:40 PM | |
| 2 | 10-24-2025 07:26 AM | |
| 2 | 06-10-2025 09:37 AM | |
| 1 | 05-13-2025 08:38 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
7 hours ago
|