Latest Contributions by LindseyStone

Thanks for the suggestions Richard.  I always validate before running the Subnetwork tool but something clearly got stuck.  So as suggested I put the line back to Subnetwork A, Validated, Ran Subnetwork tool, than disconnected line to Subnetwork A and reconnected the new line to Subnetwork B, Validate, and ran the update Subnetwork tool and this time it updated correctly.  Again not sure how it got stuck, but at least it is fixed without having to redraw everything.  Thanks for the help! ... View more

I'm having the exact same issue in my GAS utility network and yet to figure out why.  I also have an electric UN deployed and it works as expected.  So my initial thought it is a Bug somewhere in the Gas schema, now that I know it is more than me having an issue.  ... View more

@KellyHutchins I worked with tech support on this.  When I was in Enterprise 10.8.1 it would give results via a loaded web map server service (not a feature layer) on that version of the Lookup App.  On 10.9.1 they completely overhauled the App, so I couldn't even edit my existing application and had to set up a brand new one.  The old application still functions sort of.  So via the 10.9.1 version of the Lookup App I had to have the lookup part run against a feature layer in order to obtain results.  If I utilized the same web map that my 10.8.1 application was using I would get no results because it was running against a web map server service. Which is does on the documentation that was found https://doc.arcgis.com/en/instant-apps/11.0/create-apps/zone-lookup.htm that is requires a requires a feature layer to take full advantage of its capabilities.  Which should really say its intended capabilities.  Full advantage to me says somethings will work but not all.  But the fact it doesn't return any results which is the entire purpose of the app, that is more on all of its capabilities.  The tech support did say they tested in in Enterprise 11 and that did not experience issues in that version,  but I did not see an example to know if that is 100% accurate as the documentation still says the feature layer is required in that version.  ... View more

Just to verify if I'm understanding write you would like a group called Geology that has several layers underneath that you can turn on and off or choose to turn on/off the entire geology group? If so we accomplish this two different ways by publishing services to our enterprise environment and utilizing in Portal. The first way is within Pro I set up a map that has groups defined in it and when I load said service into a the Portal Web Map it honors those groups.  See below my Corp Limits is set up a group with the different type of Corp limits below and the Parcel layer is outside the group.  So I can uncheck the different limits individual or uncheck next to Crop Limits and it turns off all layers within the group. The Second way we do this is by publishing services for each category and then loading each service into the Portal Web Map.  Since they are separate services then it asks like a group layer in the map contents.  So in the below example Infrastructure, Water Mains, Sewer Mains, and Gas Mains are all different services.   ... View more

I do this via the Settings of the Web Map within Online or Portal.     ... View more

Since your WAB app is shared out to Everyone then it isn't forcing the login window.  Your options would be:  1. Share your WAB app to organization only to force the login window.  It appears you have the feature layer added to your web map and since that layer is shared only to your organization if I person is not logged in then it shouldn't even open that service.  Try opening the WAB app in incognito mode and see what kind of result you get to see if it is functioning correctly as you desire for an Everyone user. 2.  Have two WAB apps,  one for Everyone viewing and one for Editing.  The Everyone wouldn't have the edit widget and you can just add the map service layer and the Editing one would have the Edit Widget and feature layer added to the map along with the sharing properties would be just the group your desired editor is in. ... View more

For our users that require to "view only" our UN data through ArcMap I export the Asset Package and let them view that .gdb.  The biggest con to this is the database is only updated as much as I export the Asset Package which at this point is only once a month.  I have not found any other way to get the data viewable in ArcMap since you get errors if you try to load a UN enabled service or .gdb. ... View more

Thanks @EC1 , that did the trick!!! ... View more

@EC1 Did you ever get any resolution on this?  I have the same problem and have a support case open for over 3 weeks now and still no resolution. ... View more

Hi @DerekLaw  I'm reading through the steps and parameters on the document linked here https://doc.arcgis.com/en/field-maps/android/help/deploy-your-map.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_F7DE2402BA8743E5BFC4A1241072960E on this thread.  My Question is I have an arcgis Online map that I want to link to.  I'm able to get the mapped link, but it still gives me the option to either click online or enterprise to login.  Can make it go directly to the Online link bypassing the need to click Sign in with ArcGIS Online?  I see there is an option to define your portal address to do this.  I just need to do this with ArcGIS Online. ... View more

I also agree on this.  Being able to select multiple points by a lasso or rectangle when greatly improve workflow.  We have guys inspecting poles.  Going down one section of road there could be 15 poles.  Right now they have to tap on each pole to get them selected which takes an unnecessary amount of time if they could just draw a rectangle around the 15 poles. ... View more

@JSchroeder  For an update on this...I took a process very similar to option number 2 that you outlined.  Except I didn't create a new Pipeline Junction.  I utilized the existing junction - Connection Point and just added a new Junction-Junction rule from Connection Point to Meter.  I choose to do this since the Connection Point was already being allowed as Junction-Edge to the Service Pipe. The only other thing I'm noticing is that the subnetwork name is not propagating to the the Meter Setting Assembly.  I have the meters contained within the Assembly just like it is on the downloaded Naperville Data but the System Subnetwork Name still says Unknown on the Assembly.  Everything else (service line, meters, and connection point) has it filled out. Also to answer someone else's comment on this thread we do stack our meters at locations with multiple meters, so that means I change the Z values of each meter to 1-#.  We do this because the end users doesn't like the meters spread about if there is only one service line and they just want to click once on the map and be able to scroll through on the attributes to see all the meters.  Yes in the 2D model (which is how we view all of our data) you can only see one, but this is also the only place we add a meter assembly, so we can quickly tell where there are multiple meters as we see the assembly.  We do this same thing in Electric, and will eventually in Water. ... View more