|
POST
|
John, Can your elaborate on the vertical tolerance on where that is set or used?
... View more
10-22-2021
03:01 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2297
|
|
POST
|
I was hoping for a recommendation or best practices for stacked points in regards to Medium Voltage Transformers and and Low Voltage Services as I cannot find an example in the Naperville Data. 1. I have SEVERAL locations with 3 - Single Phase Overhead Transformers (they are stacked). What I have done is created a line end at z value =0, changed the z value for each of my transformers to 1,2,&3. I then associated the transformers to a transformers bank AND to the Line end. My MV conductors has a z value of 0 to connect to the line end and my LV conductors has a z value to match the transformer it is connected too. Is this the best way of doing this or should I be spreading my transformers apart where they are not stacked and leaving them all at z value 0. I've found articles depicting them both ways, but can't seem to find a reasoning of which way is more effective or recommended standards. 2. I have SEVERAL location where I have a Low Voltage Conductor is coming to the end of the building. This building has MULTIPLE meters at this location so I have placed multiple Low Voltage Service Connections at this end point of the LV Conductor to represent each meter. Since they are stacked points I have changed the z values to 0,1,2,3 etc. However when you run the update subnetwork tool only the service connection with a 0 value gets the subnetwork name as there are not other associations in the place. I don't see a default associations to a line end or any other junction with the Service Connection to make this association to the LV Conductor Line. Is there another way of doing this or should I be making an association rule between a LV Junction Line End to LV Device Service Connection for my environment?
... View more
10-22-2021
12:14 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2323
|
|
POST
|
Derek, I see that it is giving the ability to flash or just select the one particular one from the list. Which I can see be effective for some. My ultimate goal would be more of a filter based on a category selector. For instance on my hydrant maintenance table, if field paint required is marked yes, then I can have that on the category selector and it shows all the hydrants that have a related record with the field paint required is marked yes. This way staff can quickly visually see the entire town at once of hydrants that need attention and then determine from there is a section of town that is most populated and want to focus on that. Is this possible?
... View more
10-21-2021
09:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
643
|
|
POST
|
Please let me know how you would like me to share it or format and I can provide you with you need to review.
... View more
10-18-2021
06:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3029
|
|
POST
|
Here is my condition barriers. I didn't modify this in anyway from the downloaded version. As I said if they are an OPEN phase disconnect through a switch or fuse it seems to be working. It is only if it is a OPEN Load Break Switch. This is how I have it drawn in, with two MV Overhead Conductors connected to the open switch.
... View more
10-18-2021
06:22 AM
|
0
|
2
|
3033
|
|
POST
|
So I did some more testing and my OPEN Load Break Switches is the root of my error message. Where we have two feeders/circuits coming together in our system we have OPEN Air Break Switches. I have been putting these into the system as OPEN Three Phase Load Break Switches. Where I have these I get the error Inconsistent subnetwork name on multiple subnetwork controllers in the same subnetwork discovered during update subnetwork. Where I don't have them I get no error message. If I change the OPEN Three Phase Load Break Switch to an OPEN Three Phase Disconnect I don't receive an error. I have SEVERAL locations in our network that does this. At this point I just have the MV Conductor connected to the OPEN Load Break Switch connected to MV Conductor. Either side of the Switch should be a different feeder/circuit. Should I be drawing this in differently to make this work. I'm force to set terminal connections on Load Breaks so I tried to set the terminal connections to S1 on both lines, S2 on both lines, and S1 on one line and S2 on the other line and it always gives me the error. I'm running the update subnetwork tool as Electric Distribution Radial.
... View more
10-14-2021
02:34 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3045
|
|
POST
|
So I didn't define the subnetwork as Mesh. My question was more of when would I use a mesh network? So I just did a distribution subnetwork based off circuit breakers in my substations that is labeled off my feeder lines. I THINK where I'm getting the error message is from where I have an OPEN Three Phase Load Break Switch or an OPEN Overhead Cutout Fused Disconnect Fuse. In our network to different feeders connect into this open switch or fuse. Right now I just have the two lines connecting to this fuse or switch.
... View more
10-12-2021
07:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3053
|
|
POST
|
Can someone give me a good explanation of Distribution and Distribution Mesh for Tier for the subnetwork controllers in the electric system and when to use each. I did a test area and set up my Medium Voltage Circuit Breakers as the Subnetwork Controller as Electric Distribution. When I ran the update subnetwork tool I got this error message https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/tool-errors-and-warnings/001001-010000/tool-errors-and-warnings-01876-01900-001890.htm. I added the circuit breakers in 2 of our substations for a test and out of the 12 circuit breakers, 6 of them are returning a topology error of Inconsistent subnetwork name on multiple subnetwork controllers in the same subnetwork discovered during update subnetwork. I'm thinking something isn't connecting right, but I'm not sure where to start so I didn't know if my tier should have been different. It is weird that half of them are fine and half are not.
... View more
09-30-2021
01:57 PM
|
0
|
9
|
3135
|
|
POST
|
So for Containers you need to run the Add Association rule first and then you can specify it as a containment in the Add rules. That took a look of looking to be able to find that bit of info.
... View more
09-17-2021
12:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
5044
|
|
POST
|
I decided to go the route of adding a new Transclosure container in my Electric Assembly. I added transclosure to the asset type electric medium voltage transformer bank as an additional domain . However, when I go to add rule and select containment and Electric Assembly/Medium Voltage Transformer Bank by new Transclosure Asset Type is not showing in the list so I can't create it. Any ideas?
... View more
09-17-2021
11:46 AM
|
0
|
2
|
5049
|
|
POST
|
Within our Electric Network we have several transformers within transclosures. The way they were explained to me is that it is an overhead transformer mounted to a short pole and inside a enclosure to protect it. These can be attached to underground single or three phase lines. There could be 1 or up to 4 in one location. Does the electric utility network have a way of modeling this now that I'm not seeing, or is this a situation that I should add a new asset type for MV transformers that is a Transclosure and rules stating that it can connect to a MV Underground Single or MV Underground Three Phase line?
... View more
09-16-2021
12:40 PM
|
0
|
4
|
5091
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Johannes, that was what I was assuming. I just disabled the rule for now and I can make edits appropriately. I will also give your adjustments a try.
... View more
08-26-2021
05:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1244
|
|
POST
|
I'm getting the the below error message when attempting to apply a Rated KVA attribute to Medium Voltage Transformers. This was a default constraint rule on devices with the Utility Utility Network Enterprise v1. The only difference is I applied this to a Enterprise Server 10.8.1 instead of 10.9.1. Does the arcade expression have an actual error or is because I'm applying it to an older server? // Assigned To: ElectricDevice
// Type: Constraint
// Name: ElectricDevice - Transformer kVA
// Description: Validates that the features kVA is valid based on the type of transformer
// Subtypes: All
// Error Number: 5702
// Error Message: Feature kVA is not valid
// Trigger: Insert, Update
// Exclude From Client: False
// Disable: False
// Related Rules: Some rules rely on additional rules for execution. If this rule works in conjunction with another, they are listed below:
// - None
// Duplicated in: This rule may be implemented on other classes, they are listed here to aid you in adjusting those rules when a code change is required.
// - None
// ************* User Variables *************
// This section has the functions and variables that need to be adjusted based on your implementation
// 38 - Medium Voltage Transformer
// 39 - Medium Voltage Step Transformer
var valid_asset_groups = [38, 39];
var kva = $feature.ratedpower;
// ************* End User Variables Section *************
// ************* Functions *************
function asset_type_to_kva(id) {
return Decode(id,
782, [5000, 10000, 15000, 25000, 37500, 50000],
783, [45000, 75000, 112500, 150000, 225000, 300000, 500000, 750000, 1000000, 1500000, 2000000, 2500000, 3000000, 3750000, 5000000, 7000000, 7500000, 10000000],
785, [5000, 10000, 15000, 25000, 37500, 50000, 75000, 100000, 167000, 250000, 333000, 500000],
788, [30000, 45000, 75000, 112500, 150000, 225000, 300000],
789, [5000, 10000, 15000, 25000, 37500, 50000, 75000, 100000, 167000, 250000, 333000],
792, [45000, 75000, 112500, 150000, 225000, 300000, 500000, 750000, 1000000, 1500000, 2000000, 2500000, 3000000, 3750000, 5000000, 7000000, 7500000, 10000000],
793, [25000, 37500, 50000, 75000, 100000, 167000],
794, [150000, 225000, 300000, 500000, 750000, 2500000],
801, [5000, 10000, 15000, 25000, 37500, 50000, 75000, 100000, 167000, 250000, 333000, 500000],
null)
}
// ************* End Functions *************
if (IsEmpty(kva)){
return true;
}
if (!Includes(valid_asset_groups, $feature.assetgroup)) {
return true;
}
// Find the valid values, if an entry was not found, null is returned
var valid_kva = asset_type_to_kva($feature.assettype);
if (IsEmpty(valid_kva)) {
return true;
}
return Includes(valid_kva, kva)
... View more
08-25-2021
02:51 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1266
|
|
POST
|
In Electrical I had to delete Object ID 15, 16, and 17. Once I did this the tool ran just fine and downgraded the EnterpriseV1 to a utility network v4 to be able to work on Pro 2.6 and Enterprise 10.8.1
... View more
08-19-2021
02:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3091
|
|
POST
|
When running that tool with the electric utility network enterprise v1 I receive the below error message
... View more
08-16-2021
02:42 PM
|
0
|
2
|
3137
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 03-20-2025 12:40 PM | |
| 2 | 10-24-2025 07:26 AM | |
| 2 | 06-10-2025 09:37 AM | |
| 1 | 05-13-2025 08:38 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|