|
IDEA
|
This is clearly a different request (and I agree, a valid concern). Here's an idea thats loosely related about the offline calculation of fields - Improve performance of Arcade calculations when OF... - Esri Community Perhaps there's some overlap in them.
... View more
11-13-2025
04:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1298
|
|
IDEA
|
So, somehow I've managed to survive for years without coming across this issue....until now! The Statistic fields in Dissolve and Pairwise Dissolve do NOT honour "Create multipart features" option in these tools. If you leave "Create multipart features" unchecked, and are dissolving 3 polygons where 2 are adjacent and a 3rd is not adjacent and all contain an ID value to be concatenated as a Statistic field (e.g. A and B adjacent with C not adjacent), instead of producing 2 output polygons with a statistic fields that shows (polygon 1) A/B and (polygon 2) C, you get 2 polygons but both contain A/B/C in the concatenated field (as if they were a multipart polygon)! Visual example below (more reading here too). IDEA: Include an option (second checkbox or other method) to control whether the statistic fields should be calculated as per the singlepart output or original multipart functionality. Bonus points if it's enabled by default! P.S. Please update the documentation and tool tips of these tools to clearly state how these things work!
... View more
10-28-2025
05:57 PM
|
4
|
3
|
1288
|
|
IDEA
|
How have I only just discovered this problem after over a decade of using this software! Obviously I've always used statistic fields with multipart dissolves (or just never noticed the errors!). Clearly, this has had no traction seeming as how it's a 15 year old post! I have submitted direct feedback from the ArcGIS Documentation page requesting more detail in the documentation and the tool tips in ArcGIS Pro around how Statistics don't honour the "Create multipart features" checkbox. Time to submit a new feature request I think!
... View more
10-28-2025
05:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2745
|
|
POST
|
Hopefully the plan does end up including Professional user types for the same reason that Creators should include it (increasing levels of functionality with increase license price - not decreasing). At least with Creator including it though, that will make a big impact - hopefully the price per license doesn't significantly change because of it though!
... View more
10-19-2025
05:20 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1547
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the tip about the new post. Good to see another WA rep on board! Seems nothing has changed regarding the lack of tracking functionality for Administrators/Professional Plus users, or the lack of development around nested feature development. The latter being something our organisation would utilise!
... View more
10-16-2025
01:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
654
|
|
POST
|
HI Kirk. It's a shame to see this is still the case. We don't actually utilise Location Tracking in our org at present, but for someone who is an Administrator or who holds a Professional/Professional plus license, you would expect full functionality to be included! Especially for smaller organisations where there may only be 1 to a few staff doing multiple functions.
... View more
10-16-2025
01:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1653
|
|
IDEA
|
@ColinLawrence thanks, but it's still not quite developed enough for our use cases. The below screenshot shows how Edit Multiple differs from Edit Single. In this case, the smart form, should hide fields that are not intended to be edited, whilst aren't strictly read only. Also, it should auto calc the Authorised Officer, but doesn't.
... View more
10-06-2025
05:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
898
|
|
IDEA
|
@ColinLawrence to me it sounds more like the request is for a "Select by Attribute" function, though the max 50 features for Edit Multiple may also be a constraint worthy of a separate idea. We are yet to implement any Edit Multiple functionality in our Field Maps due to it not honouring smart form functionality configured via Field Maps Designer.
... View more
10-05-2025
04:50 PM
|
0
|
0
|
931
|
|
POST
|
You can set your browser (Edge at least) to clear cookies from certain sites on close. Still not ideal, but it's an option in the short term.
... View more
10-01-2025
11:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
930
|
|
POST
|
I might need to look at this. I have a view that seems to work fine until I open the webmap in Field Maps, then it says it fails to load (with a JSON error). The same map works fine in the browser (and the view is only a few weeks old too).
... View more
09-25-2025
04:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1930
|
|
POST
|
I hear you! It's a great platform and all good until you want to make changes, then all the rules are out!
... View more
09-25-2025
04:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1930
|
|
POST
|
Ahhh not good. I've had mixed success with views and either updating them or swapping sources. It seems that the older they are, the less reliable the update process is. Could have something to do with how ArcGIS Online has changed over time, but I've never really got a straight answer from support when trying to troubleshoot. The outcome has almost always been the same - start from scratch.
... View more
09-23-2025
04:36 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2007
|
|
POST
|
Just found this and can't see any related ideas - have submitted one. ArcGIS Survey123 Ideas - Esri Community
... View more
09-22-2025
08:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
655
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Monday | |
| 3 | Sunday | |
| 2 | Sunday | |
| 1 | Sunday | |
| 1 | 05-19-2026 05:02 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|