|
IDEA
|
Simple idea - add support for more file types to Survey123 (ArcGIS Online) to support relevant documentation collection for things like incident reporting forms. We've just discovered that emails (.msg) and other file types (discussed here and documented here) aren't accepted so would need to be converted to PDF's first or Zipped.
... View more
09-22-2025
08:05 PM
|
4
|
2
|
791
|
|
POST
|
Have you considered/tried publishing a copy of the updated feature service, and then changing the data source of the views?
... View more
09-21-2025
06:32 PM
|
0
|
4
|
2153
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @NaicongLi . Thanks for the additional information and context. I posted the idea to make the use of ArcGIS Pro for basic/entry level users easier to comprehend. Being able to see the ArcGIS Online/Enterprise names in the Contents pane is handy, and that it changes depending on the active portal is a good sign that what I propose is indeed possible. Essentially, I propose that the same thing happen in place of the term "Portal". Simply replace it with ArcGIS Online/ArcGIS Enterprise, or maybe Online Portal/Enterprise Portal to make it easier when accessing the Catalog Pane (how most of our users access Catalog in Pro).
... View more
09-18-2025
04:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
799
|
|
IDEA
|
Currently, contingent values can only be authored in ArcGIS Pro. Once a feature service is published to ArcGIS Online, then the contingent values can be configured in Field Maps Designer. If they weren't part of the original feature service, then they are not able to be configured Also, if you create a form in Survey123 Connect that contains filtered lists that act like contingent values, this is not honoured in ArcGIS Online/Field Maps Designer. This results in the form behaving like contingent values, but the same feature service then added to a smart form via Field Maps Designer does not - you get all values in each field. IDEA: When publishing a new form from Survey123 Connect that contains filtered lists (contingent values), store those as true contingent values and not just filtered lists. Likewise, enable the creation of contingent values in Field Maps Designer so that feature services can be modified without needing to be republished.
... View more
09-17-2025
05:04 PM
|
5
|
0
|
851
|
|
IDEA
|
Agree - both or either idea would be handy. Lots of groups and maps that appear in multiple groups can be frustrating to navigate. Likewise, the full list of maps can be a lot to scroll through as well. Being able to filter by other types of categories would be useful.
... View more
09-17-2025
04:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
742
|
|
IDEA
|
We have scenarios where a webmap is configured with a particular basemap for efficiency, but some users would prefer a different basemap for offline use. Currently the only way of keeping everyone happy is to provide 2 copies of the webmap with different offline basemap settings. Allowing the user to change to a different basemap from the basemap gallery at the time of download would be a handy function.
... View more
09-17-2025
04:44 PM
|
0
|
0
|
511
|
|
POST
|
In Model Builder, I want to clear custom Workspace variables in the Environment settings. To be clear, I want a model to run using whatever the default database/workspace of a given user is. The below screenshot shows a brand new model with a simple string variable in it) where I have Saved it without having touched the Environments. I then opened it and confirmed the pathways were pointing to my default gdb (as shown in the tool tip for Scratch Workspace). I then got a colleague to open the model and the Environments, and both pathways had changed to show her default geodatabase. I got her to manually enter a different pathway for the Current Workspace (%userprofile%\scratch.gdb) and save the model. I then reopened it and can see the updated Current Workspace pathway, but the Scratch one (left unchanged by my colleague) still reverted to my default gdb. How do I get the pathway that has been customised to go back to defaulting to the default gdb of any given user? Simply selecting the pathway and deleting it doesn't work - this just results in the current default in my project being put there and remaining hardwired for other users.
... View more
09-17-2025
12:12 AM
|
0
|
3
|
918
|
|
POST
|
Hi All. Has anyone else noticed that after upgrading to 3.5 (could be 3.4, but we skipped that version), that the Auto Layout function produces a less well displayed result? You can see in my screenshot below an existing model that was created with a previous version. If I open in 3.5 and click Auto Layout, it condenses all the groups, resulting in overlapping boxes which are harder to discern. And it's not just the grouping boxes that overlap, but they in turn also impinge on tools, resulting in no white-space around them (top row of tools for example). I can't figure out how to change this if it's a settings thing. But even if I can, it's still kind of annoying that it's happened.
... View more
09-16-2025
11:46 PM
|
2
|
11
|
2552
|
|
IDEA
|
Good idea. This isn't a solution, but something that may help make life easier in the meantime. You can set bookmarks in the webmap which can be accessed by field staff when they are creating offline areas in the field. If you have lots of features in a feature service, you could try automating the bookmark creation. I generated the below script with Copilot, but it is UNTESTED. You could implement in a Notebook and schedule regular updates (it should overwrite all existing bookmarks each time it is run). from arcgis.gis import GIS
from arcgis.mapping import WebMap
from arcgis.features import FeatureLayer
from arcgis.geometry import Geometry, union
# --- CONFIGURATION ---
feature_service_url = "https://services.arcgis.com/your-org-id/arcgis/rest/services/your-layer/FeatureServer/0"
webmap_id = "your_webmap_item_id"
bookmark_name_field = "Name" # Field used to group and name bookmarks
point_buffer = 500 # Buffer distance in meters for point features
# --- CONNECT TO GIS ---
gis = GIS("home") # Assumes you're logged in via Notebook or ArcGIS Pro
# --- LOAD WEB MAP ---
webmap_item = gis.content.get(webmap_id)
webmap = WebMap(webmap_item)
# --- LOAD FEATURE LAYER ---
layer = FeatureLayer(feature_service_url)
features = layer.query(where="1=1", out_fields="*", return_geometry=True).features
# --- GROUP FEATURES BY NAME ---
grouped_features = {}
for feature in features:
name = feature.attributes.get(bookmark_name_field, "Bookmark")
grouped_features.setdefault(name, []).append(feature)
# --- CREATE BOOKMARKS ---
bookmarks = []
for name, group in grouped_features.items():
geometries = [Geometry(f.geometry) for f in group]
# Union geometries
dissolved_geom = union(geometries)
# Determine extent
if dissolved_geom.type == "point":
x, y = dissolved_geom['x'], dissolved_geom['y']
extent = {
"xmin": x - point_buffer,
"ymin": y - point_buffer,
"xmax": x + point_buffer,
"ymax": y + point_buffer,
"spatialReference": {"wkid": 102100}
}
else:
extent = dissolved_geom.extent
bookmarks.append({
"name": name,
"extent": extent
})
# --- UPDATE WEB MAP ---
webmap.definition["bookmarks"] = bookmarks
webmap.update()
print(f"✅ Added {len(bookmarks)} bookmarks to the web map.")
... View more
09-14-2025
04:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1097
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing! Certainly sounds like your passion for GIS has not waned but grown over time!
... View more
09-03-2025
08:54 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1819
|
|
IDEA
|
I'm actually having trouble understanding the request and how it relates to the replied roadmap item. The roadmap item itself is clear enough, but it's not what I think of when reading the OP's idea. To me it sounds more like you want to lock layers so that they can't be inadvertently changed to suit one Map Frame, which then impacts another existing Map Frame/Layout that uses the same source map? It should remain consistent across all layouts. Is that right?
... View more
09-02-2025
06:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1969
|
|
POST
|
Ahhh - I see what you were trying to achieve. Not quite what I'm looking for. That Filter list you have created is static. It will only change if you open the Model Properties > parameters and update the list manually. I want the list to be generated dynamically depending on the values from a specified field in a feature class or table. For example, my feature class has a list of plantations. I want to be able to process data on one plantation selected from the list. Over time, more plantations are added to the feature class, but the list won't update to reflect that unless I do so manually. Not ideal when I'm building models for lots of different business units and the data changes regularly. Side note - that video you linked to is a great video though. I hadn't seen it before so will try watch it through to see what else I might be able to learn.
... View more
08-25-2025
06:01 PM
|
0
|
1
|
455
|
|
IDEA
|
In Model Builder, one of the core fundamentals is input parameters - being able to select a feature class, field, value, etc etc to feed into your model and do things. But one limiting factor seems to be that for Field and Value type parameters, you need to pre-author the value list (drop-down list) that can be selected from in the model parameters. There is no way (that I have been able to find out as documented here) to have these lists generate dynamically based on a predetermined or input feature class/table. IDEA: Add out-of-the-box functionality to Model Builder to generate dynamic value lists in Model Parameters based on a previously input dataset. The dataset may or may not also be a configurable input parameter. Use Case: When create a model where the input feature class changes, the list of fields and/or values may also then change, meaning you can't pre-create value lists in the Model Parameters. Even where an input feature class doesn't change and is no a parameter, the values in a feature class may change over time, meaning the Filter Value Lists are no longer representative of the dataset being filtered.
... View more
08-24-2025
06:11 PM
|
1
|
0
|
853
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately no! I just retried some of the linked content and still nothing worked. I gave up in the end. Have checked and couldn't find an idea that reflected this need so have created one. Dynamic parameter Filter/Value lists in Model Buil... - Esri Community
... View more
08-24-2025
05:32 PM
|
0
|
4
|
2858
|
|
POST
|
Support ticket submitted to add support to the listed Bug and Enhancement requests above! UPDATE: Response from Esri Support (Australia) below. The slower performance observed in the Edit widget was attributed to querying all layers within the associated Web Map. This issue aligns with a previously identified defect (ENH-000175894), which was addressed in the ArcGIS Online June update. However, similar behaviour has been reported again in this case and a few others. As a result, a new defect has been logged to formally recognise this recurring issue with the Edit widget in Experience Builder. ENH-000178405 - Allow the Edit widget of ArcGIS Experience Builder application to load faster.
... View more
08-20-2025
05:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
809
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Monday | |
| 3 | Sunday | |
| 2 | Sunday | |
| 1 | Sunday | |
| 1 | 05-19-2026 05:02 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|