|
POST
|
Have you moved any layers about in your contents pane? I've noticed that tends to reset the masking so check that all the masking settings are still applied as intended.
... View more
07-11-2025
05:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
178
|
|
POST
|
Map Series is definitely worth investigating in the first instance as it is out of the box functionality as opposed to Production Mapping which is an extra cost. We have implemented Map Series for a number of functions in our business that used to manual map production. We managed hundreds of plantations, and sometimes need to produce standardised maps for many at a time. There are a number of options for setting up the "areas" (e.g. polygon index layer). That same index layer can be used on a separate key map, to highlight or mask surrounding areas on your focus maps, etc.
... View more
07-11-2025
05:43 AM
|
1
|
0
|
602
|
|
POST
|
Hi. Do you have an advanced license? In a nut shell, I use one of these to: Convert line vertices to points (Feature Vertices To Points (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation - ADVANCED license) Erase the points that fall within the polygon (Erase (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation - ADVANCED license) Reconstruct the lines from the remaining points (Points To Line (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation - BASIC license) At the time I didn't figure out how to do it without an advanced license, but with some playing around with python, now I have! Starting data: 1. Convert lines to points using below python code: import arcpy
# Set paths
input_fc = r"C:\YourProject\YourGDB.gdb\YourPolylineLayer"
output_fc = r"C:\YourProject\YourGDB.gdb\PolylineVertices"
# Use the same spatial reference as the input
spatial_ref = arcpy.Describe(input_fc).spatialReference
# Create output point feature class
arcpy.CreateFeatureclass_management(
out_path=r"C:\YourProject\YourGDB.gdb",
out_name="PolylineVertices",
geometry_type="POINT",
spatial_reference=spatial_ref
)
# Add a field to track original feature ID (optional)
arcpy.AddField_management(output_fc, "SourceID", "LONG")
# Insert points
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(input_fc, ["OID@", "SHAPE@"]) as search_cursor, \
arcpy.da.InsertCursor(output_fc, ["SHAPE@", "SourceID"]) as insert_cursor:
for oid, polyline in search_cursor:
for part in polyline:
for point in part:
if point:
insert_cursor.insertRow((point, oid)) 2. Use Select by Location to select undesirable points 3. Use Delete Rows to delete selected points 4. Use Points to Line to reconstruct lines from remaining points Turn that python code into a python tool and you can string that into a model with the rest of the tools to repeat as needed.
... View more
07-11-2025
05:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1187
|
|
POST
|
Can confirm what @DavidSolari has said. You can change the arcade coding in the popups, labels, etc as much as you like. Those changes will display on newly opened online maps instantly, but will only appear in offline maps after the repackaging and will not affect existing offline copies. Even adding new feature services won't cause any issues. It's only if the schema of or sharing/access to an existing feature service changes that an offline map may then fail to sync.
... View more
07-10-2025
04:01 PM
|
1
|
0
|
456
|
|
POST
|
Happy to share a sample app - can you provide a username/s and I can add to a group?
... View more
07-09-2025
04:23 PM
|
0
|
1
|
533
|
|
POST
|
Looks like it could be a Cookie issue. Had a user try forced refresh and that didn't work, but clearing their Cookies did. Will monitor. Still happy to share if you want to investigate at all as it didn't start happening until after the updates.
... View more
07-09-2025
04:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1445
|
|
POST
|
If I had selected 2 features created by 2 different people with their names stored via a calculation, unlike a normal field, it doesn't show the "Differing values" line. It just calculates with the new value straight over the top (I imagine this is expected behaviour). Though, as per the "Differing values" functionality in Batch Attribute editing, it would be good to optionally have that field update or preserve the original (differing) values (maybe a button appears for each calculated field which refreshes calculations when being used by a Batch Edit Widget).
... View more
07-09-2025
03:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
857
|
|
POST
|
OFFICIAL If you want to send me usernames, I'm happy to share the apps to you to examine. I think I've got another one that needs to be done still.
... View more
07-09-2025
08:24 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1457
|
|
POST
|
We have found that in some of our Experience Builder webapps, the Edit widget is failing to load up properly after the June 2025 updates have been applied. In troubleshooting the issue, it also seemed to be inconsistent for different users despite all being the same user type and role plus in the same groups. After trying to recreate the Edit widget from scratch in one Experience Builder, we thought we had fixed it. So we deleted the original, renamed the new one back to "Edit" and , oh wait - nope still not working. Rename to something else, and it works!! Moving on to the 2nd EB app that I've found with this problem, and I implement the same fix as above and get similar results - 1 works and 1 doesn't where the new one was loaded in side-by-side with the old one. Anyone else finding issues with their Edit widgets post updates? Both edit widgets are identical.
... View more
07-08-2025
12:21 AM
|
0
|
14
|
1889
|
|
POST
|
In Experience Builder, we have found that when a feature is updated and those updates cause the feature to no longer be visible in the View layer being edited, it then brings up the "Discard the edits?" confirmation box. This is despite the updates having been applied. It then doesn't matter whether you select "Discard edits" or "Continue editing", the feature is gone and the Edit widget is cleared. Example in action - note that after hitting "Update", the shape doesn't disappear off the screen until the layer refreshes (takes a minute or two).
... View more
07-07-2025
11:28 PM
|
0
|
6
|
599
|
|
POST
|
Glad someone has found this and reported it - I was about to do so as it's driving me nuts! Not just the slow loading, but having to wait for it every time I make a change to a problem Edit widget and try to test the updated App with a different account with lower role privileges.
... View more
07-07-2025
10:42 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1451
|
|
IDEA
|
@StuartMoore found this issue with the new Batch Attribute Editing functionality and saving values returned in calculated fields - posting for cross reference. Nearly there but not quite! New Batch Editor functionality doesn't work for ca... - Esri Community
... View more
07-06-2025
11:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1356
|
|
POST
|
Confirmed - I'm seeing the same behaviour. Very disappointing! Thought I was clear free when I saw that it was honouring the calculated Required and Visibility conditions, but alas, one search to find if there were others finding issues, and here we are. Also discovered in testing this issue, that if you have features with differing values in a field, it correctly returns the (Different values) statement in that field if it's a normal field, but not for Calculated fields. Something else that should be considered. Time to disable again. @AlixVezina
... View more
07-06-2025
11:14 PM
|
2
|
4
|
1036
|
|
POST
|
Hi @JaneDisney You'll need to post some more info as we can get some context. Screenshots and/or process that they are trying to achieve?
... View more
07-01-2025
06:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1154
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 08-24-2025 06:11 PM | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 10-08-2024 09:01 PM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2025 12:17 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|