Latest Contributions by LindsayRaabe_FPCWA

‎05-23-2023

Idea posted here to get this resolved! Include ability to update feature service Feature ... - Esri Community

‎05-23-2023

That is confusing. As much as I'd like to see it rolled in for consistency, I'd prefer to see a solution in any format (stand-alone?) compared to the current non-solution.

‎05-22-2023

Scenario: I can add a new Domain value to a feature service and update the symbology to include that new domain value in the layer, which appears in all my maps, but then once in that map, I can't create a new feature using that new Domain value. I currently have to create a feature using one of the original feature templates, and then edit the feature type to use the new domain value. This is not ideal. IDEA: When configuring a feature service in ArcGIS Online, we can use the Visualization page to configure things such as Label expressions, Symbology, Popups, etc.....but currently there is no way to update the default Feature Templates for the feature service - include this as an option please! As discussed here, existing feature templates can be modified using the Field Maps Designer per map that contains the layer, but these changes can NOT be applied universally and inherited by all maps containing that layer (the way you can with a label, popup or symbology change) (update: this change does flow through to all maps containing that layer, but is still limited to editing existing templates and doesn't permit creating completely new feature templates). And if the feature templates are updated in Map Viewer Classic, these are also ignored in the new Map Viewer and Field Maps.

‎05-22-2023

And to clarify, whilst I have managed to add a new feature template in Map Viewer Classic, that doesn't flow through to the new Map Viewer either.

‎05-22-2023

Hi. Thanks for the detailed information. I've just had a look through the options and it still seems there's no way to add a new feature template in ArcGIS Online. The Field Maps designer only updates the map the layer is loaded into, and not all maps containing that layer. It also doesn't seem to allow the creation of a completely new feature template, just duplicates of existing templates with different field defaults (not a new "category" of feature though added to a Domain after the original layer was published). This seems like a major oversight in the feature service management workflow.

‎05-03-2023

Just got this in an email from ESRI. Updates have been made to the following defect which you are associated with: BUG-000137676 - In ArcGIS Pro, unable to remove duplicates using the Distinct Arcade function in the Dynamic Text tool for table attribute values. Status: Fixed (Learn More) Version Fixed: 3.2 Additional Information: This issue is addressed in ArcGIS Pro 3.2.

‎05-03-2023

Just got this in an email from ESRI. Updates have been made to the following defect which you are associated with: BUG-000137676 - In ArcGIS Pro, unable to remove duplicates using the Distinct Arcade function in the Dynamic Text tool for table attribute values. Status: Fixed (Learn More) Version Fixed: 3.2 Additional Information: This issue is addressed in ArcGIS Pro 3.2.

‎04-26-2023

I am building a dashboard style display in Experience Builder that shows features in a map, and provides basic charting and filter functions. The layer of interest in the map is also referenced in a pie chart on the side of the dashboard. When you click one of the feature categories in the chart, a Filter Action is supposed to reduce the features displayed in the map to only show those matching the selected category. However, whenever I select it, it seems to pick a different, random category. I've recreated the chart and the action multiple times but can't get it to behave as it should. It doesn't seem like a complex setup, so what is going wrong? LindsayRaabe_FPCWA_2-1682563363996.png LindsayRaabe_FPCWA_3-1682563387138.png LindsayRaabe_FPCWA_4-1682563400662.png

‎04-25-2023

I'm not across the different server types. We ended up bringing forward the spin-up of a new server with clean installs and running a modern OS. The one used above was nearly a decade old and full of rubbish. The new server ran much cleaner, though the URL input parameter was still a problem. I ended up finding a work around (or maybe "better") solution for the ArcGIS Online source data that did work without having to change anything else (which leads me to think the firewall wasn't an issue). Instead of using the URL as the input parameter in the tool, I used it as the input parameter for the below code, then passed the local_fs parameter to the geoprocessing step. print ("Export ArcGIS Online layer to feature class") infc_nf = #"ArcGIS Online Feature Service URL here" proc_gdb = #"path to GDB" import arcgis.features from arcgis.features import FeatureLayer fl = FeatureLayer(infc_nf) fs = fl.query() local_fs = fs.save(proc_gdb, "local_fs") print ("Dissolve layer") diss_nf = arcpy.management.Dissolve(local_fs, proc_gdb + "\\dissolve_nf", "Field1", "", "MULTI_PART")

‎04-23-2023

I have a python script that takes an ArcGIS Online feature service and uses it as an input in an arcpy Dissolve process. I built it (and ran it successfully) on my PC which was running ArcGIS Pro 3.1 but found it wouldn't work on our server which was still running 2.9.5. I put this down to advancements in the capabilities at the 3.0 upgrade and relevant python packages. However, we recently upgraded our server to 3.1 as well and when I tried running this script on there, it fails complaining about the parameters (fails at the step where it tries to dissolve a feature service). Why would this be when all the software is supposedly the same? My PC no error 2.png BUN-GIS-01 error 2.png Also, other script that were running on the server have now inexplicably stopped working. No error codes, they just stop. Why????? My PC no error.png BUN-GIS-01 error.png

‎04-20-2023

Your posts will be interesting to follow. I expect a moderator will likely move your post out of ideas and into the discussion section, but it will great to see what problems you come up against and the different solutions you try and implement. I know from personal experience that this can be a super frustrating process!

‎04-12-2023

@Bud I could see those types of options being of value in some cases (just not in my posted example). Could even be a drop-down list of options under the Default Value, or custom value.

‎04-11-2023

When using the Append geoprocessing tool, you have the option to use the field map to reconcile field differences between the Input data and Target data. My idea, is that when you do use this method, you have an additional option under field sources to input a default value for those fields that don't have a match. In my example below, I'm appending data from one layer with a simple Label option, into another layer that has a corresponding "Comments" fields, but also a "Class" field with 4 class options (for basic data categorisation). It would be a good time saver, if in the Class Field, I could either type in a default vale that is added against all appended features, or alternatively, select an option from the Feature Template. Obviously, it would be fine if left blank, or would not be used if a source field is mapped. LindsayRaabe_FPCWA_0-1681280811343.png

‎04-05-2023

@DougBrowning that use of multiple vector basemaps (I assume you mean either loaded through the map view or sideloaded to a device?) would be a great option for increased flexibility. My issue with the current solution is that a lot of our reference data in our Vector basemap is then covered by the polygon layers in our maps. I would love to be able to separate the Vector basemap even into just a "top" and "bottom" basemap where data would either display beneath all layers (as per current basemaps) or on top of all layers (ideal for roads, streams, points of interest, etc). Being able to load multiple basemaps with specific data in them that could be toggled on and off would be even better!

‎04-05-2023

I've had similar thoughts about being able to save Arcade expressions to an AGOL-wide library for reuse across layers and maps. Good to see it's already on the roadmap (somewhere).

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Tuesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by LindsayRaabe_FPCWA

Re: Field Maps New Template confusion

Re: Field Maps New Template confusion

Include ability to update feature service Feature Templates on Visualization page

Re: Field Maps New Template confusion

Re: Field Maps New Template confusion

Re: How to remove duplicate values from Dynamic Text (Attribute Value)

Re: Arcade function to show unique values (remove duplicate values)

Experience Builder Chart Filter Action not working

Re: Scripts works on PC but not server running same python versions...why?

Scripts works on PC but not server running same python versions...why?

Re: My Experience Managing/Conducting a Large Offline Collection

Re: "Default Value" option for non-matched field when using Append tool

"Default Value" option for non-matched field when using Append tool

Re: Enable the use of externally hosted feature layers in offline maps

Re: Allow saving Arcade expressions across layers

Re: Creating Dynamic Field Maps for Tools in Model...

Check all previous "required" questions are comple...

Re: Field Maps Smart Form Attachments Widget not O...

Show Survey123 forms as "Forms" instead of "Apps" ...

Re: Field Maps Smart Form Attachments Widget not O...

Esri Forestry Group (EFG)

ArcGIS Arcade

Experience Builder Tips and Tricks