|
POST
|
I have built a Model (with 2 sub-models) that is meant to follow the following logic for preparing data for use in Network Analysis route solving (Stops): - 2 input point feature classes (Origin points and Destination points) - For each Origin (i.e. A/B/C/D) and Destination (i.e. W/X/Y/Z) point combination, generate a Route Name (i.e. A_W, A_X, A_Y, A_Z). Each Origin point goes to many destinations and needs to be copied with the unique Route Name applied to each copy to match a destination point that gets the same Route Name applied. - Append all Origin and Destination points to an output feature class (Stops) The final table will have what was originally 4 Origins copied in 4 times each with the unique route name to each Destination, plus each destination point copied in 4 times to pair with each origin location (A_W, A_X, A_Y, A_Z, B_W, B_X, ..., D_Y, D_Z). Graphics below show the main model which has input parameters for selecting the Origin and Destination feature classes, then a sub-model which iterates through each Origin location, and that has within it another sub-model which iterates through each Destination location to achieve the required value creation and data copying. The issue I've found is that whilst the model works as expected for the first Origin point, generating unique Origin/Destination combinations for all destinations, it doesn't then continue on to do the same for the next Origin location (the point of the first sub-model/iterator), resulting in the output FC only having a portion of the data required. Sorry if this is very wordy, but couldn't figure out how to write it any more clearly. Ultimately, I'm trying to create the required data for generating multiple routes in one hit using Network Analyst.
... View more
10-11-2022
08:41 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1477
|
|
POST
|
Is your script running on local feature classes or feature services in ArcGIS Online? I'd love to find a way to manage ArcGIS Online domains from centralised lists.
... View more
10-05-2022
05:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3617
|
|
DOC
|
Really handy and will do nicely until ESRI fix the Truncate function for feature services!
... View more
10-04-2022
01:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
44522
|
|
IDEA
|
@Mbizzy I have used that before, but still found it would time out after a a few thousand records and I'd have to hit refresh and submit the query again, repeatedly until all the records were gone.
... View more
10-02-2022
05:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1948
|
|
IDEA
|
Pretty straight forward idea. I find that having favourites doesn't always work well, as it depends what the project I'm working on is, as to what tools I would consider "favourite". I also don't like having to set my favourites all the time, but would rather have a "Recent" section at the top of the list that gets populated with the 6(?) most recent Edit tools that I've used in the project (maybe initially based on favourites or simply empty until an Edit tool is used and populated as the list grows to a max number of tools).
... View more
09-15-2022
12:40 AM
|
8
|
0
|
516
|
|
IDEA
|
This would be a welcome addition. I've managed to write a python script that runs as a tool where you can input a value and it creates definition queries against specified layers, but it does need to be maintained if layers are renamed/added/remove, and it doesn't update or remove existing queries - they just stack up if you run it more than once.
... View more
09-08-2022
09:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1586
|
|
IDEA
|
An additional comment after having my idea merged with this one - I would like to see a little bit more granular control over the locking mechanism as detailed above. Instead of the whole map (all or nothing), the ability to lock groups or individual layer positions (i.e. where they're more important than other layers) would be preferential.
... View more
09-07-2022
06:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6528
|
|
IDEA
|
IDEA: Include ability to lock the order and grouping of layers in the Table of Contents in the Map (not layout) USE CASE: I've built numerous map templates with numerous grouped layers and where Models need to be run using map layers as the input parameters. If layers are reordered/ungrouped, it can break the input parameter meaning the user needs to figure out which layer was meant to be there. It would be good if I had the ability to lock the layer order and groupings in the Table of Contents to prevent unintended rearrangements, removals, groupings, etc. Something similar to the Lock/Unlock option in Map Layouts for elements but applied in the Map view. A locked layer would not be able to be dragged up/down, removed or grouped/ungrouped until the lock was disabled.
... View more
09-06-2022
06:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4032
|
|
POST
|
Yeah - I thought it looked pretty buggy. I just went back to the project (which has since had the dynamic text deleted and static text put in it's place) and tried to recreate it. I'm using a newer version to my colleague (3.0 compared to 2.8) but it's still happening. I insert a new text box and copy the Plain Text view across and it works as intended. Obviously something wrong with that particular element. Not worth reporting as it's clearly not systemic, even within the project.
... View more
09-05-2022
07:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1363
|
|
IDEA
|
Agreed. Being able to use the vehicles in-built nav system would be handy for navigation and also feature collection (though maybe this is better suited to Quick Capture but full Field Maps control through the dash would be best). It also means not having to break the law to use your mobile device while driving (at least in Australia).
... View more
09-05-2022
05:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3392
|
|
IDEA
|
@Scott_Harris Bang on - yep. **bleep** terminology getting in the way of a good idea 😁
... View more
09-01-2022
09:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1655
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi Scott. To clarify, I'm not talking about when creating features (that was just an example of where you can already set the default tool), but when editing existing features it would be good to change the default construction tool from Line Segment (to Trace for example).
... View more
08-31-2022
06:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1678
|
|
POST
|
I have a layout that contains a text box. In the text box is some dynamic text (pulling attribute values as displayed in the layout) and some static text after all the dynamic values are returned. In this scenario, we have 5 values being returned (which is higher than normal - usually only 1-3 values - but in itself, not a problem). After returning all the values, the static text "Operations Map" should be added (it's the map title). HOWEVER....for some reason, there seems to be a character limit. The text displayed on the layout is dropping the last 2 letters (the "ap" of "Map"). We tried resizing the box, the text format size and adjusting the delimiting values and the values returned. In the end, we just manually typed in the title in full as it was a one-off map, but it still seems very bug-like. Does anyone have any pointers as to what might be causing this?
... View more
08-30-2022
10:27 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1401
|
|
IDEA
|
When you create features, you can set a feature template to use a default tool (i.e. Line Tool, Freehand Line Tool, Trace Line Tool, etc). IDEA: It would be good if you could change the default option in the Construction Toolbar when EDITING features (not creating) to something other than the Line Tool as well (probably in the Project Options > Editing Window).
... View more
08-30-2022
07:00 PM
|
4
|
6
|
1727
|
|
IDEA
|
Another simple option would be to have an "in the next" option that works the same was as "in the last", but for the future.
... View more
08-25-2022
05:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
555
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 08-24-2025 06:11 PM | |
| 1 | a month ago | |
| 1 | 10-08-2024 09:01 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Monday
|