Latest Contributions by LindsayRaabe_FPCWA

I've just added an extra "Solution" to the post which simplifies the findings down to a couple of clear 1 liners. It isn't a solution to how to use Absolute paths all the time, but it does clearly explain the behaviour around 'moving' projects and what happens to the relative pathways.  For what it's worth, we manage a lot of ArcGIS Pro project templates, stored on a G drive. Our users have been instructed to Open and Save As these to their desired location so that all pathways are maintained. If they were to Copy/Paste the project instead, all the pathways mapped to a Drive letter would be updated (relative pathways). I'm about to do some more testing on UNC pathways - I've seen text stating that these don't change, which may be an (annoying) solution for us. All our GIS data is stored on network Drives (G & V) or in ArcGIS Online as a feature service (no issues there at least).  ... View more

Hi @JesseWickizer. Yesterday I ran into a small "bug" with the new scale bar visibility features. I'd spent some time creating a set of 3 scale bars with different Visibility ranges (<1:10000 / 1:10k - 1:30k / >1:30000). For the middle interval, I had the scales set to 1:10001 - 1:29999 with the upper and lower bars set to the round 1:10000 (Min) & 1:30000 (Max) values.  However, the problem was that the scale bars weren't showing up when I zoomed to a "Max" scale value.  TODAY however, I went back in to get more screenshots for this post, and now they work as expected.  So, instead of asking for guidance around whether this should be logged as a bug or is expected behaviour, I'm instead going to suggest that you use thresholds that are unlikely to never be used, instead of clean breaks like I have, JUST IN CASE! ... View more

Great idea and a cool setting I've learnt about too. May need to implement this in a few map templates.  ... View more

Hi team. I submitted a blog post for review a week or 2 ago but can't seem to find where it is or if it's been published, reviewed, rejected, etc. Is anyone able to point out how I can find where it's at? I definitely wanted it reviewed as it's my first time writing a blog and wasn't sure if I was on the right track or not regarding content and quality.  ... View more

Fully back this idea (and @DougBrowning's sentiments!) - text wrapping is needed in Field Maps Popups. It's very difficult to be efficient when you can't determine which feature you need from a list of truncated feature titles.  ... View more

Just discovered this little nugget of gold in the 3.3 version of Pro. This makes life a lot easier!      ... View more

Just discovered this little nugget of gold in the 3.3 version of Pro. This makes life a lot easier!    ... View more

Just went looking for how to do this. Surprised that there isn't more people wanting this ability. We are starting to generate a lot of forms in Survey123 in our org and not all of them are for field use, thus it would be nice to be able to hide them from the Download Surveys list in the field app to make it easier for staff to navigate.  ... View more

Can I suggest adding the purpose of the code to the post heading to make it more searchable? I believe it's a Lat/Long conversion code, which I know a lot of people would be looking for. Also maybe add some tags to improve search results.  ... View more

I thought this was something we could do already - turns out I was wrong. Kudo added! ... View more

Thanks for sharing your experiences! The problem we are facing with the projections is not actually in ArcGIS Online (as you say, it all works nicely up there)....it's back in ArcGIS Pro.  When we add a feature service to a map in Pro, if it uses a GDA94 projection, and the map also contains GDA2020 projections, the transformations get confused and Pro introduces shifts against some of the datasets. We've been agonising with this issue for a couple of years on and off. After reaching out on here (Solved: Clarification around Transformations in ArcGIS Pro - Esri Community), we finally got the answer back that GDA94 and GDA2020 do NOT play nicely together, and that all data in a map should be either in one of the other.  Thus, we have decided to do a bulk republish and bring everything in ArcGIS Online back to the standard WGS84 Web Mercator auxillary sphere, which does play nicely with other projections.  ... View more

Good questions. I've avoided even looking at trying this out because it wouldn't be worth it without being able to offer it to all our users. As a Professional or Professional+, my staple is Pro for map making. WebMap exports really is suited for Creators (and Mobile Workers) so makes sense to offer it to them.  Interesting to see comments on the blog post asking the same questions have gone unanswered.  ... View more