POST
|
My map has one feature layers with several related tables, when I edit the related table online using Collector it works fine, but when I take the map offline, something strange happens: just for one related table,let's say the table is named Assessment_Complete, when I click "New", instead of showing me the table, it shows me a message "No valid Location", and it seems thinking I intend to collect the location on the map! I am really confused, because I have already selected a location and this is only a related table without any spatial field what so ever. the most confusing thing is the other related tables seems work fine! this is on my iPad air, on my Nexus 5, opening the offline map just simply crashes Collector, leaving me a message "Unfortunately, Collector has stopped" Is it just me?
... View more
09-09-2015
07:17 PM
|
0
|
8
|
5001
|
DOC
|
a must-read document for people trying to understand the general concept of Portal before they dive into more specific topics.
... View more
09-07-2015
11:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2266
|
BLOG
|
Hi Ismael, The repeat function sounds really interesting. I really like the smart form feature of Survey123, but my situation is like what you said “ want it all, something that runs anywhere…”. Instead of asking people the location, I know where the property is and have some baseline information of the property, now I need to do an assessment/inspection on it. so I kind of need to identify the property and then bring up the question forms to start the assessment/inspection. Currently, I am using Collector to do it, it works, but the form in Collector is not as ‘smart’ as in Survey123, it does not support the basic logic like “Relevant” function in Survey123. I even don’t know if my case should be classified as “form-centric” or “map-centric”, we do have lots of forms, but the forms are designed for individual properties which has a specific location! Cheers, Simo
... View more
09-07-2015
09:58 PM
|
4
|
0
|
18349
|
BLOG
|
Good stuff. just one question, how well does Survey123 support related tables for features. I am thinking of using the smart form for asset inspections. Cheers,Simo
... View more
09-07-2015
05:20 PM
|
2
|
0
|
18349
|
POST
|
Hi Miaogeng, Thanks for referring me to the blog. it sounds like if there are no datum transformation involved, assuming the GPS accuracy is acceptable, then the GPS position and the map should match. Miaogeng Zhang Gordon Sumerling I don't know what device the users will have at the end, because they are from different government agencies, I don't think they will have uniform devices. maybe some use android phone, some use iphone&ipad, windows phone when collector is available on that platform. I hope we don't need external GPS units, but I'll see after the first field test. Simo
... View more
08-30-2015
05:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
956
|
POST
|
have you seen this post before, it seems only Pro supports python 3.4. ArcGIS Desktop and Server (AGOL is server) only supports 2.7.7 Python in ArcGIS 10.3
... View more
08-27-2015
05:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
678
|
POST
|
Hi Ron, Thanks for your reply. let me clarify my situation, I am NOT going to collect the information of the GPS location, instead, I am using GPS to "identify" the properties and assess the properties. so knowing where I am on the map is quite important and the more accurate the better I reason I raise the concern was that I had a thought on GPS maps then I did a bit Google research on it. I can assume the GPS receiver is always giving me the right coordinates (lat/longs or other units in UTM projection). but the 2D map I am using to show the GPS dot is a result of particular projection, which is based on a datum and a projection method. by this point, maybe the question should really be: is the GPS and the map I am using are using the same datum? because I think, if the datum is the same, the actual lat/long in two systems (GPS and the map) for a location on the earth is the same, they should match. in definition for WGS84 and Web Mercato Auxiliary Sphere, it seems the datum is the same, so maybe it should not be a question... if I am using another Geographical Coordinate System in my map, there may be a problem, the GPS location on the map can drift away (for example, I am standing in a property, but the GPS shows I am standing out of the property on the map) I am curious what map projection do they use in the commercial GPS Unit in our cars. Hopefully I am not making an obvious thing too complicated. I am not a surveyor, they should know these things better.
... View more
08-27-2015
04:49 PM
|
0
|
2
|
956
|
POST
|
For application authentication, instead of using AGOL account (User logins), you can use application ID to and App secret to get a token to access the content shared with the app developer (with an AGOL account). this is convenient when you are developing an app to users who don't have AGOL accounts. So I think you have to use the token in your application which AGOL will recognise, because you registered the application.
... View more
08-26-2015
11:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
292
|
POST
|
Hi there, I am thinking of using Collector to collect data in the field, but I am not sure what base map I should use. ESRI provides lots of base maps with great cartography, but my concern is the projection. as you know, those ESRI base maps (maybe not all of them) are using Web Mercato Auxiliary Sphere (WKID: 102100) which used to be a very controversial projection (Google/Bing maps started using it) and is not very accurate. although it's well accepted by the GIS industry now, I am wondering whether or not it will cause problems when using GPS in the Collector? I don't know what kind of GPS my users will have on their devices, but we know all the GPS will use WGS84 datum. Web Mercato Auxiliary Sphere is using the same datum, will this guarantee there won't be any accuracy loss when displaying the GPS locations on the map? we don't really care about the accuracy to the true location, only relative accuracy to the map matters. I did some test using my phone, the result is not too bad, but don't know if that's just a individual case, or it's guaranteed to be working on other devices as well. I am in Australia, the most popular projections in my work are GDA1994_MGA (283xx) and GDA1994 Lambert (3017) Thanks, Simo
... View more
08-26-2015
10:36 PM
|
0
|
5
|
3707
|
POST
|
Hi Robb, I don't know how you can auto-populate the facility ID in the related table using relationship. basically, the only thing will be populated in the related table, when you add a record, should be the GUID which is the key linking to the GlobalID in your feature class. So the point is, the table only relates to the feature layer, the relationship won't pre-populate / auto-populate any fields in the related table.Robb Hodges Cheers, Simo
... View more
08-06-2015
06:45 PM
|
0
|
2
|
662
|
POST
|
I don't know how hard it is to allow the users to choose which camera app to use in Collector, maybe an option in Collector settings? I am not a IOS developer, I don't really know if it's possible or not.Russell Roberts
... View more
08-05-2015
03:55 PM
|
1
|
2
|
690
|
POST
|
Will it be nice to have the above function in the Webmap in ArcGIS Online? I searched around and found this article in ESRI Knowledge Base: http://support.esri.com/es/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/43075 but, contrary to what stated in the article, I found join via relationship class does not work in ArcGIS Online, it only works as a relate. A unique feature of join is the appended fields which can be used to symbolise the features and label the features. there are no appended fields in the service in ArcGIS Online, so I don't think the genuine join is working. There are some ideas in ArcGIS Ideas, but I don't know if ESRI is considering the fuction. let's promote them anyway if you think it's a useful function. https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E0000000CxLr&returnUrl=%2Fapex%2FideaList%3Fc%3D09a300000004xET#sthash.8htTvKfH.dpuf https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E0000000CxPF&mc=0
... View more
08-04-2015
07:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2643
|