Latest Contributions by ChelseaRozek

Those suggestions did not fix it for me. @JCGuarneri , did you find any work arounds? ... View more

@Robert_LeClair Looks like that bug says it's a duplicate now, can you tell which bug # we should be following now? ... View more

Would be nice if there was a Share>Map File (.mapx) option under the right click menu for Maps in the Catalog pane so we don't have to open them completely to get the toolbar to display it as an option. Like how when you right click feature classes in the Catalog Pane, there's an Export option. You don't have to add them to a map to then be able to export them. ... View more

Have any permissions or functionality been removed, aside from being able to be Administrators? ... View more

@patrickb Is there a way to get the "none" option to work when using contains as the operator? "None" doesn't show all of my records like I was hoping it would.  ... View more

Thanks so much for posting this! It got it working for my user ... View more

@AlixVezina Yup, here's the BUG number: BUG-000163071 The drafts do not get saved when the visibility is turned on under “Data” for those feature layers which is not visible in a web map in Experience Builder ... View more

1) Ah, unfortunately this runs into an issue I forgot I made an Idea for more than a year ago where you can't "show" layers that aren't turned on in the web map by default. So it sounds like I'll have to make a duplicate web map which is a hassle to maintain. 2) Awesome, I'll have to give it a try then! Thanks ... View more

I'm having this issue too with one of my surveys, but it's been going on a couple of weeks now. I made a brand new survey and it populates the token fine via the webhook. Making a new webhook on the old survey didn't help. @MitchellOttesen1 Did you find a solution? @Shwu-jingJeng Is there another token issue going on? ... View more

Same here! It's only erroring out on one arcade expression even though everything looks fine. The table exists etc. and we use this same expression format for other rules that aren't erroring out. Did you find a solution? I'm about to put in a ticket.   ... View more

Interesting. The gap for us would be a license level before Pro is included that allows for full control of items in AGO (like the "Publisher" role). For us, Pro is too intimidating for our lite GIS users to want to learn, but they're willing to dabble with creating AGO things like storymaps or their own webmaps from our org's layers. Even our entry-level editors will need a standard Pro license, so at least the Professional user type, as they're editing versioned data on our enterprise geodatabase, so I'm not seeing much of a use case yet for the Creator user type. Our rep hinted at editing branch versions as an a la carte add on in the future, which would make Basic much more useful, but we'll see if that actually happens. Update: if you like the "publisher" user type too, upvote this idea! Another use case is for users who have to be in multiple portals but don't want to have to waste unused Pro licenses/$$ for a Creator level ... View more

In case it helps anyone, I've noticed some of my issues are resolved by double checking which user is uploading and publishing the new vtpk and which user owns the existing, published vtpk it will be replacing. It seems to work best if the same owner owns both the old and new even if they're both admins and thus shouldn't be an issue (at least in my opinion). ... View more

That's a bummer it's still an issue in 11.3. Guess we won't be in a hurry to update. I'm in the same boat where some of my python scripts work and others fail. It may be the same vector tile layer that fails each time, do you guys notice if it's the same one every time or is it random ones? ... View more

Hey @NeilWebber/all, on this other thread RussRoberts mentioned that "dynamic 'centroid' placement for polygons" should be a part of the fall update! hooray! ... View more