Latest Contributions by ChelseaRozek

I'm worried about the many administrative hassles that moving to named user licenses from concurrent licensing will create, this being one of them. We won't be able to afford having unused licenses sitting around for this sort of situation. I can picture this happening to someone who needs to bump up to a Pro Advanced license with Professional Plus for one project, but there are no more Professional/Standard licenses available for the existing Professional Plus to be bumped down to. Like you said, it would be nice if they could just swap in place. ... View more

Moving to named user licensing might mean that our departments will need to pay for their own licenses instead of the organization covering all the concurrent licenses. It would be nice if somehow categories in ArcGIS Online/Portal could work with the licenses, so like 6 users have the Parks category and 8 licenses have that category, so we still have 2 Parks seats available. Someone with a different category like Health wouldn't be able to have a Parks license assigned to them. ... View more

Please upvote one of these ideas: - Disabled member accounts still consume a User Type... - Esri Community - AGOL Disabled Account returns Licences - Esri Community ... View more

Please upvote one of these ideas: - Disabled member accounts still consume a User Type... - Esri Community - AGOL Disabled Account returns Licences - Esri Community ... View more

Was about to write my own idea for this, so here's what I was going to say: Migrating to the new user types from concurrent licensing is going to add the hassle of assigning/unassigning licenses to named users, especially when it comes to seasonal or temporary employees. One thing that would make this a little easier was if disabling a named user freed up that license. As disabling the user means they can't log in, no license would in use anyways. Normally I have to get around this by moving all their items to myself and then back to them later when they start working again. As long as you have at least one Creator/Admin user in your organization with a valid license that could have hypothetically taken all those items or ownership of the groups, it seems like that should be allowed. It would save us a lot of hassle of moving items around, trying to remember which groups they were in, hoping their same name is still available, and reassigning group ownership. ... View more

Was about to write my own idea for this, so here's what I was going to say: Migrating to the new user types from concurrent licensing is going to add the hassle of assigning/unassigning licenses to named users, especially when it comes to seasonal or temporary employees. One thing that would make this a little easier was if disabling a named user freed up that license. As disabling the user means they can't log in, no license would in use anyways. Normally I have to get around this by moving all their items to myself and then back to them later when they start working again. As long as you have at least one Creator/Admin user in your organization with a valid license that could have hypothetically taken all those items or ownership of the groups, it seems like that should be allowed. It would save us a lot of hassle of moving items around, trying to remember which groups they were in, hoping their same name is still available, and reassigning group ownership. ... View more

@ChrisBuscaglia Our County Equalization department says:  "Our process is that, if the Treasurer finds any meaningful discrepancy between a property’s deeded legal and our tax description, they will bring it to our office for verification.  To verify, we will be exhaustive and map out the parcel based on the deed description for comparison.  Most deeds are metes-and-bounds (COGO), so we need a solution that allows our front desk staff (1 full-time Equalization technician and 1 part-time aide who both do not specialize in GIS) to easily enter metes and bounds courses and display the result within the context of our parcel polygons and cadastral layers. They are our first line for fielding these checks. Two full time GIS Specialists can also verify deeds that are more complicated or involved. The ability to verify deed descriptions is a critical function of the department, in association with the Treasurer’s office, to ensure that property being transferred (and subsequently taxed) is the same as the property being assessed for purposes of taxation." ... View more

Linking this idea to the mature support thread here: Mature Support Notification: Parcel Drafter - Esri Community where you can also share your feedback. ... View more

We're eagerly awaiting a replacement. For anyone else in the same boat, please upvote the idea here: Parcel Drafter Widget - Experience Builder - Esri Community ... View more

I'm not sure what you mean. It isn't a hosted feature layer as it's coming from our enterprise geodatabase so I can't make a view off of it. I don't want these points to be editable, so I didn't turn on feature access, so it's only a map service. These are different layers than the editable points. They're just for reference on the map. ... View more

So it looks like if you add layers in as a map service (all together), the popups do not work in the final app. I added each layer in the map service (that is published to our own server) as a separate item in AGO and now I can see the popups. So creating an AGO item from servicename/MapServer, didn't work. Creating ones like servicename/MapServer/1 and then adding those to the webmap allowed the popups to show in the final app. It doesn't seem like this should be necessary if they work fine in the webmap with the first way. ... View more

Hi @SubaKrishnan I have non-editable layers with popups turned on in my webmap (yellow points). When I click on them in my final app, no popup appears. I hope to be able to click on the points so users can reference previously submitted issues.  ... View more

Hi @SubaKrishnan , how was it addressed in the October release? I WANT to show popups in mine, but nothing happens when I click on them in Reporter even though I can see them in the webmap. ... View more

@JCGuarneri Thanks for the quick reply! That's a bummer, feels like a step backwards instead of forward... May have to stop using them. ... View more