Latest Contributions by ChelseaRozek

Was about to write my own idea for this, so here's what I was going to say: Migrating to the new user types from concurrent licensing is going to add the hassle of assigning/unassigning licenses to named users, especially when it comes to seasonal or temporary employees. One thing that would make this a little easier was if disabling a named user freed up that license. As disabling the user means they can't log in, no license would in use anyways. Normally I have to get around this by moving all their items to myself and then back to them later when they start working again. As long as you have at least one Creator/Admin user in your organization with a valid license that could have hypothetically taken all those items or ownership of the groups, it seems like that should be allowed. It would save us a lot of hassle of moving items around, trying to remember which groups they were in, hoping their same name is still available, and reassigning group ownership. ... View more

Was about to write my own idea for this, so here's what I was going to say: Migrating to the new user types from concurrent licensing is going to add the hassle of assigning/unassigning licenses to named users, especially when it comes to seasonal or temporary employees. One thing that would make this a little easier was if disabling a named user freed up that license. As disabling the user means they can't log in, no license would in use anyways. Normally I have to get around this by moving all their items to myself and then back to them later when they start working again. As long as you have at least one Creator/Admin user in your organization with a valid license that could have hypothetically taken all those items or ownership of the groups, it seems like that should be allowed. It would save us a lot of hassle of moving items around, trying to remember which groups they were in, hoping their same name is still available, and reassigning group ownership. ... View more

@ChrisBuscaglia Our County Equalization department says:  "Our process is that, if the Treasurer finds any meaningful discrepancy between a property’s deeded legal and our tax description, they will bring it to our office for verification.  To verify, we will be exhaustive and map out the parcel based on the deed description for comparison.  Most deeds are metes-and-bounds (COGO), so we need a solution that allows our front desk staff (1 full-time Equalization technician and 1 part-time aide who both do not specialize in GIS) to easily enter metes and bounds courses and display the result within the context of our parcel polygons and cadastral layers. They are our first line for fielding these checks. Two full time GIS Specialists can also verify deeds that are more complicated or involved. The ability to verify deed descriptions is a critical function of the department, in association with the Treasurer’s office, to ensure that property being transferred (and subsequently taxed) is the same as the property being assessed for purposes of taxation." ... View more

Linking this idea to the mature support thread here: Mature Support Notification: Parcel Drafter - Esri Community where you can also share your feedback. ... View more

We're eagerly awaiting a replacement. For anyone else in the same boat, please upvote the idea here: Parcel Drafter Widget - Experience Builder - Esri Community ... View more

I'm not sure what you mean. It isn't a hosted feature layer as it's coming from our enterprise geodatabase so I can't make a view off of it. I don't want these points to be editable, so I didn't turn on feature access, so it's only a map service. These are different layers than the editable points. They're just for reference on the map. ... View more

So it looks like if you add layers in as a map service (all together), the popups do not work in the final app. I added each layer in the map service (that is published to our own server) as a separate item in AGO and now I can see the popups. So creating an AGO item from servicename/MapServer, didn't work. Creating ones like servicename/MapServer/1 and then adding those to the webmap allowed the popups to show in the final app. It doesn't seem like this should be necessary if they work fine in the webmap with the first way. ... View more

Hi @SubaKrishnan I have non-editable layers with popups turned on in my webmap (yellow points). When I click on them in my final app, no popup appears. I hope to be able to click on the points so users can reference previously submitted issues.  ... View more

Hi @SubaKrishnan , how was it addressed in the October release? I WANT to show popups in mine, but nothing happens when I click on them in Reporter even though I can see them in the webmap. ... View more

@JCGuarneri Thanks for the quick reply! That's a bummer, feels like a step backwards instead of forward... May have to stop using them. ... View more

Those suggestions did not fix it for me. @JCGuarneri , did you find any work arounds? ... View more

@Robert_LeClair Looks like that bug says it's a duplicate now, can you tell which bug # we should be following now? ... View more

Would be nice if there was a Share>Map File (.mapx) option under the right click menu for Maps in the Catalog pane so we don't have to open them completely to get the toolbar to display it as an option. Like how when you right click feature classes in the Catalog Pane, there's an Export option. You don't have to add them to a map to then be able to export them. ... View more

Have any permissions or functionality been removed, aside from being able to be Administrators? ... View more

@patrickb Is there a way to get the "none" option to work when using contains as the operator? "None" doesn't show all of my records like I was hoping it would.  ... View more