|
BLOG
|
I get the blank screen too when trying to login (from Portal), and yes the Registered App is setup and the Re-direct URI added. That's not the problem. It's trying to load a localized language file that doesn't exist. in this line of code: https://assistant.esri-ps.com/locales/en-US/strings.json
... View more
01-04-2023
10:29 AM
|
3
|
0
|
10325
|
|
BLOG
|
The Info Summary widget in WAB is probably the most used widget in all of our web apps and dashboard themes. It's a quick, intuitive way for users to quickly identify and navigate to key points on a map. The existing features of the widget work well for our needs. In Experience Builder it would be ideal if this widget could also interact with other widgets. The Info Summary and Add Data widgets are the two key things currently missing from EB, and reason enough NOT to use EB until these have been added. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to see some live examples.
... View more
12-19-2022
04:45 AM
|
10
|
0
|
8116
|
|
IDEA
|
Why was this important feature removed? Please put it back!
... View more
08-17-2022
05:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1311
|
|
IDEA
|
Hey all, This post is a long time coming. After speaking with a couple of Survey123 developers at the UC last week, I'm finally getting around to posting this idea to the community. TL;DR - Reorder fields in Survey123 based on an input set by the user. Survey123's success in my organization can be partially attributed to the ability to show & hide fields based on a condition set in Survey123 Connect. As an example, a lengthy maintenance inspection that differs from year to year can be consolidated into one mobile form. What was once 7 different forms on a different platform is now 1 form in Survey123. Less to manage, easier to maintain, and reliable offline capabilities. But I digress. In the effort to standardize this process, I have fielded feedback from multiple users asking to change the order of the fields in Survey123. Their reasoning is based in efficiency in the inspection process, as well as the ease of training others on how to perform the inspection. For context - this is related to electrical substation inspections. As I have come to find out, not all substations are created equal. Some have components that others don't have. Some have different layouts & different points of access. In an effort to streamline this process as best as possible, I have built relevant expressions to address the former, but have no good way of addressing the latter. Below, Substation A represents a custom field reordering, given one substation's needs. Substation B shows what the original survey looks like. Substation A Substation B In the spirit of consolidating this process (rather than create 30+ unique substation inspection surveys), I'm requesting a solution for reordering of fields in Survey123, conditionally based on user input. Thanks all, and special shout out to Barbara & Derek at the Survey123 booth(es) at the 2022 UC. @JamesTedrick for visibility @DavidForbuss1 had a similar request
... View more
07-22-2022
06:05 AM
|
3
|
1
|
600
|
|
POST
|
Are there any plans to include the Info Summary Widget from WAB in Experience Builder? Or has this been permanently replaced by the List Widget in Experience Builder?
... View more
07-22-2022
03:26 AM
|
1
|
2
|
931
|
|
POST
|
@ThomasPerriment1 Came here with the same exact question. Have you ran into any issues (performance or otherwise) since you implemented this? What order did you insert your readme sheet into the xlsform? Thanks in advance! -Mike
... View more
07-07-2022
07:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
805
|
|
POST
|
Any changes? Still have lots of users submitting surveys without a username.
... View more
06-07-2022
11:29 AM
|
0
|
1
|
885
|
|
POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro 2.9.2 the process of converting BIM .ifc files by manually running these tools in order works fine: BIM File to Geodatabase Make Building Layer Create Building Scene Layer Content However trying to run these same tools in Model Builder fails. I contacted ESRI support and there is a known bug for this issue: BUG-000144891 Hopefully will be resolved soon, as running this process in Model Builder is much more efficient than doing this manually if you have multiple large BIM datasets to convert.
... View more
04-06-2022
03:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
432
|
|
POST
|
Okay, I'm going to jump on this bandwagon since I now need this. Has there been any resolution? I too tried the method shown in the above posts and it did not work - no attribute data was generated along with the vector tiles. 6 years since the original request here. ESRI can you please respond?
... View more
03-23-2022
12:25 PM
|
7
|
0
|
7341
|
|
POST
|
With some assistance from ESRI tech support we began digging through the IIS logs on the Portal machine to help pinpoint this issue. It appears the the issue is may be with the Imperva WAF filtering external traffic accessing applications hosted on our cloud infrastructure. The following POST request is not making it to our IIS server when users are not on VPN. Example of the POST command logged in Windows IIS that is successful when a user is on VPN: "2022-03-09 23:05:02 10.123.7.13 POST /server/rest/services/Hosted/Basic_Field_Notes/FeatureServer/uploads/upload - 443 - 10.123.6.244 ArcGISRuntime-iOS/100.13+(iPadOS+15.3.1;+iPad6,4)+arcgis-fieldmaps/21.4.0+(7F99388A-C4AF-43B7-A8E7-A1DDC9643F55) - 200 0 0 513" If the users are on VPN the POST request makes it to IIS, and the application performs as expected. If they are not on VPN this Post request never makes it to IIS and does not show up in the log. We suspect it's some combination of the word "upload" and/or the ArcGISRuntime-iOS headers that is causing the WAF to think this is bad traffic and filter it out. Interestingly the notes on this web page indicate the Imperva WAF settings in existing customer accounts are being migrated to new WAF rules beginning in March 2022, so this may be related to the problem since it just started in March 2022. https://docs.imperva.com/bundle/cloud-application-security/page/policies.htm We are still investigating the issue.
... View more
03-11-2022
03:37 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2575
|
|
IDEA
|
@TanGnar @Anonymous User @PeterKnoop I have a perfect use case: I have an inspection in S123, where the responses are Yes or No. I'm trying to code the popup so that the "failed" results of the inspection stand out from passed checks. The problem is that "No" responses don't always mean the check fails. I built functionality into the survey to return a 1 or a 0, where 1 is pass and 0 is fail. SO It would be slick if I could built one expression like this: function issue_detected(response, isIssue){
IF (isIssue == "0"){
return "Check Failed"
}
ELSE IF (isIssue == "1"){
return "Check Passed"
}
ELSE{
return "something went wrong"
}
} AND could pass arguments to the function in-line, rather than hard coding each variable into the Arcade expression. As @TanGnar mentioned: {expression/expr0, $feature.check1, $feature.check1_pass_fail}
{expression/expr0, $feature.check2, $feature.check2_pass_fail}
{expression/expr0, $feature.check3, $feature.check3_pass_fail} Rather than maintaining three (or in my case, ~50) separate, pseudo-carbon-copied expressions... //{expression/expr0}
function issue_detected(response, isIssue){
IF (isIssue == "0"){
return "Check Failed"
}
ELSE IF (isIssue == "1"){
return "Check Passed"
}
ELSE{
return "something went wrong"
}
}
issue_detected($feature.check1, $feature.check1_pass_fail)
//{expression/expr1}
function issue_detected(response, isIssue){
IF (isIssue == "0"){
return "Check Failed"
}
ELSE IF (isIssue == "1"){
return "Check Passed"
}
ELSE{
return "something went wrong"
}
}
issue_detected($feature.check2, $feature.check2_pass_fail)
//{expression/expr2}
function issue_detected(response, isIssue){
IF (isIssue == "0"){
return "Check Failed"
}
ELSE IF (isIssue == "1"){
return "Check Passed"
}
ELSE{
return "something went wrong"
}
}
issue_detected($feature.check3, $feature.check3_pass_fail)
... View more
03-07-2022
09:44 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2169
|
|
POST
|
Strange issue that began occurring just recently (March 3, 2022) Field Maps users are unable to sync changes made on iOS devices only from a downloaded map package hosted on Portal - Android devices continue to work normally. The error returned in the app is "Request Forbidden". This is not specific to any one map, or even any one portal in our organization - it happens only on all iOS devices (regardless of the iOS version) and regardless of the Field Maps version, and it is happening on different portals. The error only occurs if using a downloaded offline package and making edits - there is no error when downloading the package to the device and just viewing it, everything looks normal. Field Maps does work correctly on all iOS devices on Portal only IF they are on VPN. Field Maps does work correctly on all iOS devices on AGOL regardless of VPN. So it appears the issue may be related to a recent policy change on our internal network, rather than anything to do with Field Maps or iOS. Digging into some of the logs a bit deeper, it appears there may be an error passing the token back to Server only when trying to sync edits made to an offline package. Tracing the error backwards, it appears it may be happening before it reaches our internal DNS - as though something in the header may no longer being passed correctly, either in the Web Application Filter (WAF) , the DMZ Load Balancer or Apache Reverse Proxy. Has anyone experienced similar issues? This one looks like it may be difficult to troubleshoot, so any ideas about how to proceed are appreciated.
... View more
03-07-2022
07:33 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2632
|
|
POST
|
Same here. Beginning at approximately 5:25pm EST on Wednesday, Feb 23 all feature reports began failing to generate with a timeout error. It appears they continued to fail up until at least 9:55pm EST... beyond that I don't know. The reports failed to generate either from Integromat or MS Power Automate. Trying to generate the reports manually from the Survey123 web site also failed, so it's definitely an issue related to the ESRI service. The Today - Thursday, Feb 24 I was able to successfully generate feature reports beginning at 6:15am EST, however it appears the problem is once again back since its now failing again at 7:29am EST. The service issue is not documented anywhere on ESRI's platform. The ArcGIS Health Dashboard shows everything is operating normally, clearly it is not - at least for the Survey123 web site. The report generation appears to hang in the S123 web platform with the Status: Converting...0% and does not time out in a reasonable amount of time. Notice in the attachment below it took 3h12m before the job finally terminated and was marked as Failed.
... View more
02-24-2022
04:54 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2120
|
|
POST
|
Thanks to James Tedrick at ESRI - the solution to the issue we were having generating reports using the Create Feature Report API in Microsoft Power Power Automate has been resolved. The issue was a bit difficult to diagnose, since everything worked as expected except when a geopoint question was included in the report template, then it could not render the map on the report and the process would timeout. The solution is to make sure the generateToken API request in the flow includes the value referer=https://survey123.arcgis.com
... View more
01-27-2022
04:28 AM
|
0
|
6
|
2508
|
|
POST
|
Thanks to James Tedrick at ESRI - the solution to the issue we were having generating reports using the Create Feature Report API in Microsoft Power Power Automate has been resolved. The issue was a bit difficult to diagnose, since everything worked as expected except when a geopoint question was included in the report template, then it could not render the map on the report and the process would timeout. The solution is to make sure the generateToken API request in the flow includes the value referer=https://survey123.arcgis.com
... View more
01-27-2022
04:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6131
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 11-03-2025 11:44 AM | |
| 2 | 10-31-2024 07:02 AM | |
| 1 | 02-02-2024 11:08 AM | |
| 6 | 06-20-2023 06:36 AM | |
| 3 | 01-04-2023 10:29 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|