|
BLOG
|
That's great news, looking forward to it. Thank you Ismael.
... View more
07-30-2016
02:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31246
|
|
POST
|
Printing is in the way according to Ismael in his reply.
... View more
07-25-2016
04:19 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2272
|
|
POST
|
Survey123 does not support data editing at the moment. This is a functionality that is being worked on as far as I know and will be available later. In the meantime you have the options Ron mentioned above to edit your survey data.
... View more
07-25-2016
02:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1628
|
|
BLOG
|
I had another think about it and you may be better off with using an input mask for that field instead of a regular expression. With that you can control the number of characters, whether they are letters or numbers etc. Have a look at "Input masks" in here. I hope it helps. Zoltan
... View more
07-20-2016
03:52 AM
|
1
|
0
|
20535
|
|
BLOG
|
This is a known limitation. Follow this blog article to create a tile package with more levels. (You don't need to upload it to AGOL, so you can skip that part.) Create a tiling scheme with more levels you need right now, so you can re-use it later. I hope this helps.
... View more
07-19-2016
05:39 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3985
|
|
POST
|
Weird. I had a quick look and I get the same error when I just hit Update Layer Definition without changing anything. It seems that it has problems with the definition of 'LastEditDate' and the 'editingInfo' parent. Since AGOL stores the date information in milliseconds (converter here), the syntax seems to be ok for me. On the other hand, a quick search on the internet reveals that it is an issue dated back in 2014. Have a look at the 2nd comment of this blog post, there is a workaround (tried and works). Might be a good idea to take this up with Esri support as Jeff Shaner (product manager at Esri) stated that the service team was looking into this back in October, 2014... I hope this helps. Z
... View more
07-15-2016
02:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2860
|
|
POST
|
Not sure what the data type is, I can only guess from the field name. If it's "Date", then I don't think it's wise to modify any of the properties as it may break time enabled functionalities in ArcGIS Online. If you attach the schema I may be able to help with the changes, but no promises.
... View more
07-15-2016
12:05 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2860
|
|
POST
|
It's still early days for Survey123, so there may be a print functionality in the Survey123 site at some point. In the meantime you need to use the same approach as for Collector: download the collected data as a FGDB and feed it into a data driven page document in ArcMap. I hope this helps.
... View more
07-13-2016
04:35 AM
|
2
|
1
|
2272
|
|
POST
|
When you use the "other" option, it treats the question as a relevant question, although not sure where to look for the extra field and its properties. You can see them in survey123 Connect if you go to the Schema tab of your survey, but you cannot modify it there. There doesn't seem to be any entry for it in the xlsx file though. Until someone tells us where to modify the properties for the hidden "other" field in the xlsx file, you have 2 options: 1. Modify the schema of the created feature service in AGOL. You can follow the steps detailed in this blog post. You will need to know the name of the "other" field to modify its values, so make a note of it first. Once you updated the schema, you need to download the survey again to the device and it should honour the changes. 2. Instead of using the "other" option, simply create a relevant option for the question during design mode to define the field you want to display when "other" is selected. With that you can define its field length and other parameters in the xlsx form. I hope this helps. Zoltan
... View more
07-13-2016
03:59 AM
|
1
|
4
|
2860
|
|
POST
|
GT-I9505 here. I tend to say that it seems to be specific to the Galaxy S4 alongside with some other issues I experienced. Time to upgrade I guess.
... View more
07-13-2016
03:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2999
|
|
BLOG
|
No problem. Hopefully it can get fixed in the next release.
... View more
07-07-2016
05:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31246
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi Jason, I think the regular expression you need would look like this: regex(.,'T+[0-9]{9,9}') {m,n} matches the preceding element at least m and not more than n times, so it should be {9,9} in your case as you need exactly 9 numbers after the letter 'T'. Mind you, in practice the form only seems to use the value for m and completely ignores n. It throws an error if you have less than 9 numbers after T, but lets you enter more than 9 as well. (Same issue with any combination, tried {3,4} and so on... ) It's the same with the example in the article for email addresses. Based on the expression regex(., '[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,4}') , it should check that you have a proper email address ending @domain.xx, @domain.xxx or @domain.xxxx. However, it accepts anything after @ if you have at least 4 characters, like @mmmm which should throw an error. (Using Survey connect 1.5.35) If this is not a bug, then the documentation needs some updating... Zoltan
... View more
07-05-2016
04:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
20535
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi Ismael I started looking into using calculations on geopoints as I was designing a survey. I used the same approach as detailed above, but I noticed something weird so I double checked it using the XLSForm provided above (which is also included as a template in survey123) and it does the same. I noticed that the geolocation question does not honour the manually set location as your last line suggests above: "One last tip: If you would like to block field users from overwriting the location set by your calculation, you can set your Geopoint question to read-only." Although it lets me modify the location, it pretty much ignores what I set manually and defaults back to the location set by the calculation. The co-ordinates displayed in the geolocation window are the same as set by calculation... I tested it on Windows 7 and Android and observed the same issue (can check in Survey123 connect too). Looking at the data that goes out when synchronising/submitting, it honours the co-ordinates set by the calculation and ignores the location I set manually. It gives you the impression that you can modify the location, but it does not overwrite the values/co-ordinates set by the calculation. See screenshot of the process below. Zoltan
... View more
07-01-2016
08:54 AM
|
1
|
0
|
31246
|
|
BLOG
|
Thanks Ismael. You may want to update the link at the bottom of your article too as it still points to the old location (the first link works ok). Zoltan
... View more
06-29-2016
04:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31246
|
|
BLOG
|
Not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but I cannot access the sample XLSFile mentioned above. Every time I try to access it I'm getting the below error. (Regardless I'm logged on to geonet and/or survey123.arcgis.com.) Zoltan
... View more
06-28-2016
07:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31246
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10-18-2023 09:16 PM | |
| 1 | 07-01-2016 08:54 AM | |
| 2 | 04-09-2021 06:14 AM | |
| 1 | 05-13-2021 12:38 AM | |
| 1 | 05-12-2021 03:06 AM |