|
POST
|
This would be my go to solution in the label expression: Replace($feature.FieldName," County","") For the reasons mentioned above, I would avoid the Split option.
... View more
01-16-2024
08:34 PM
|
4
|
0
|
3557
|
|
POST
|
I think I've figured out where the problem was/is. The issue reared it's head again in my new model despite starting from scratch in a new model and toolbox. It occured after I finished building one of the large blocks of tools, which I would then copy and paste to use as the basis of the 2nd large block but with customisations to suit the different parameters. Instead, I put these large blocks into submodels (blue text in image below) and when I opened the model and submodels on my other machine and checked the field mapping, they were retained! Solution in short: Use submodels where possible for large blocks of tools (especially when copy/pasting those blocks).
... View more
01-16-2024
05:48 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1824
|
|
POST
|
I've just tried packaging a project with the tool in it and opening on another machine and it's just confirmed that the whole thing needs to be started from scratch. I went about cleanup up all the different copies I've generated trying to figure this out and toolbox corrupted and I lost the lot (except what was packaged). Starting from scratch now and looking at the silver linings where I can - at least now I can build in efficienies as I've done the workflow part previously, so I can go about getting from A to B to C in a more direct and cleaner manner than I had before.
... View more
01-16-2024
04:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1826
|
|
POST
|
I've been investing a heap of time in building a new model to streamline a currently very manual data entry process - but have hit a HUGE road block. When I open the model on a different PC either as myself or as a different user, the field mappings in a number of Spatial Join and Export Feature tools constantly reset. To be clear, I edit the model on my PC and see customised field maps (i.e. Text Field length = 512) but then open the exact same model in the same toolbox on a different machine and the field map has changed (i.e. Text Field = 0)! This is driving me nuts! I've tried the following to get around/fix this, all to no avail! - Do a Save As on the model within the toolbox - Do a Save As into a new toolbox - Create a new blank model and copy/paste the steps across - Give up with my PC and work on it using a remote server login. Even this isn't working as I got a colleague to open it and she isn't seeing the latest field mapping Please please please can someone suggest something I can try to stop this happening! I've had this happen before, and have just given up and walked away and either it started working again or I started again from scratch (not something I want to have to do now). I suspect it's my user profile, but can't be sure. The below screenshots are of the same model but opened on my PC and opened on the remote server.
... View more
01-15-2024
08:14 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1966
|
|
POST
|
That would only work if there was one end of a line for it to extend to. As you see in later examples, this wouldn't work as it would extend out into the open with the other end of the line falling too short for it to intersect with.
... View more
01-09-2024
09:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
5072
|
|
POST
|
Handy tool! I've just customised to make a simpler version for my own use. Others may find handy. #
# GP Script tool - Message
# for use in ModelBuilder
import arcpy
# Two text parameters:
# 0) Message type: ERROR, WARNING, INFORMATIVE
# 1) Message text
msgType = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0).upper()
msgText = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(1)
# Return msgText and format based on msgType parameter
if msgType.upper() == "ERROR":
arcpy.AddError(msgText)
elif msgType.upper() == "WARNING":
arcpy.AddWarning(msgText)
else:
arcpy.AddMessage(msgText)
... View more
01-04-2024
06:03 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2818
|
|
IDEA
|
Dropping this post here as a reference for others in the future looking for a work-around. Message script tool for ModelBuilder - Esri Community
... View more
01-04-2024
04:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6578
|
|
IDEA
|
Please please please include this functionality! The ability to add a message that indicates an outcome beyond "The precondition is false" would be great! Being able to add a custom message to the output of the different logic steps would be good for when a tool doesn't run due to the user not doing something (i.e. No selection was made). Currently, they need to know that they need a selection before running a tool. If they don't, there's nothing telling them that thats where they went wrong (in many of my use cases anyway).
... View more
01-04-2024
04:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6582
|
|
IDEA
|
@DanPatterson Did you intend to post a separate reply previous to your "But..."? Thanks for the links though. Good to know where those resources are, but we all love a shortcut! Hopefully this idea if implemented can improve user awareness of deprecation and new feature roll-out.
... View more
01-03-2024
08:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3814
|
|
IDEA
|
IDEA: In ArcGIS Pro, it would be handy if when browsing a system Toolbox, tools had a marker indicating they are Deprecated or are New in the version you are running. For example, the below screenshot shows tools in the "To Geodatabase" toolset in the standard "Conversion Tools" toolbox. You can already see markers to show locked tools based on your licensing. "Table to Table" and "Feature Class to Feature Class" are deprecated tools, replaced by the "Export Table" and "Export Features" tools. Instead of opening each tool to then see it has been deprecated, a marker could indicate this at a glance for all tools, and the Tool Tip you see when hovering could also include the replacement tool.
... View more
01-03-2024
05:59 PM
|
11
|
7
|
3897
|
|
IDEA
|
When editing data in ArcGIS Pro, when clicking on Save or Discard Edits, you currently get a window like the below showing which layers contain edited features. IDEA: Add an option to both the Save Edits and Discard Edits buttons to either: A - Save/Discard all Edits (as per current functionality) B - Save/Discard selected Edits When selecting the "Save Selected Edits" option, you would get a similar window showing layers that contain edits, but you can select which layers to commit. The unselected layers would continue to be held in the edit session until either Saved later or Discarded. The "Discard Selected Edits" function would work the same, but for discards - discarding edits in only the selected layers and retaining the rest in the Edit Session. This would be handy where edits have been made to otherr layers by accident and not picked up on until later (and where you would normally have these layers editable for other purposes) so you can't simply hit the Undo button. It would also be handy where in situations like I've just been going through, I deleted features in a number of layers as I went to track and reduce the remaining Edits I needed to make in another layer, but I may not want to actually commit those deletions upon Save and could selectively discard those.
... View more
12-19-2023
07:52 PM
|
13
|
3
|
3695
|
|
POST
|
Hi Zach. I don't think Arcade will do what the OP is wanting (creating a new polygon feature based on a buffer from the created point feature). Arcade can calculate a buffer for searching/intersecting purposes, but won't actually create a feature. Also, to confirm, it does run at the time of feature creation/editing in Field Maps - not post creation. Although, once the feature is created, the Arcade function will also run if you edit the feature in the WebMap/WebApp later on (essentially refreshing the initial calculation).
... View more
12-19-2023
04:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3640
|
|
IDEA
|
@AubriOtis Thanks for the suggestion. I've moved the "Layer" part of the idea into the other post as a comment, and updated this idea to reflect the Element component only. Hopefully that gives it a better chance at getting legs! I agree - this is something that we could use relatively frequently. I try to use Dynamic Text and other dynamic elements as much as possible, but sometimes they just can't be filtered to the degree that is required (i.e. Visible Rows is not good enough - we only want a selection of data to be referenced but the surrounding features still visible, or a combination of query and visible rows, but at present it's one or the other). So we defer to static elements in these use cases and update those text boxes as needed (usually using an Excel Pivot Table to generate the summary after copying the Attribute Table out). If this idea (Provide Table Summary Options without graphical co... - Esri Community) got legs, that would help out heaps in this space too!
... View more
12-18-2023
03:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2837
|
|
IDEA
|
In addition to my previous comment on layer tags for non-display order grouping, I had posted an Idea here (Link Element & Layer Visibility to Bookmarks - Esri Community) which I've updated to be Element specific, and have moved the Layer portion to this comment to support this idea. IDEA: Add function to link Map layer Visibility to Bookmarks. I see this working by having a list of checkboxes on a new section of the Layer Properties window (or maybe in the Feature Layer ribbon instead) where you can enable Bookmark Linking and set which Bookmarks would make a layer visible when navigating to the Bookmark. Layers would be turned off when a non-checked Bookmark is selected. Manually moving/changing the map extent would have no effect further effect. By extension, this could be connected to the Bookmark type of Map Series. Bookmark Linking functionality summary: - If not enabled (not checked), the layers remain as per what you last set them in the Table of Contents (on or off) when you navigate to a Bookmark. - If enabled (checked), then the layers would turn on when a checked Bookmark is navigated to, and off when an un-checked Bookmark is navigated to. - If enabled and no Bookmarks are checked, then it would always turn off when navigating to any Bookmark. This could be a useful way of ensuring that "reference" layers don't display on final map products. This idea is similar to the Page Query function where features are filtered by map series, but applies to a whole layer (or Group Layer as per my example below). I have a layout and am using a series of Bookmarks to focus on different views of a property - an Overview and then 3 Focus maps with more detail. I tried using Page Query with a Bookmark map series, but that didn't really work (I don't want to hide features - just labels. To achieve this I have exported labels for 2 layers to different sets of Annotation for each bookmark extent. I've then grouped them by Map Name so I can turn them on and off as I move through the Bookmarks. This would tie in with the other Idea linked above regarding Elements to dynamically update layers and elements as you move from Bookmark to Boomark.
... View more
12-18-2023
02:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4428
|
|
IDEA
|
Just added my thoughts to this post which suggests being able to Group layers outside of the traditional "Drawing Order" groups to make it easier to turn on and off related layers: Group layers without changing the layer order - Esri Community
... View more
12-17-2023
05:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2861
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 2 | Tuesday | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|