Latest Contributions by RobertKrisher

When you do an upstream or downstream trace, you must either choose to use a domain/tier or you must choose digitized direction. You can run a digitized direction trace in an area of the network that has subnetwork controllers, but the trace will ignore the controllers to determine flow. A section of your network can belong to multiple subnetworks (within the same tier), as long as the controllers themselves can't connect to each other. In your example, if that manhole normally bifurcates flows, even when it is not under significant flow, then the area upstream of a manhole that bifurcates flow would belong to multiple tributaries and therefore multiple subnetworks. If the bifurcation only occurs when there is enough flow in the system, then the area upstream would only belong to a single subnetwork since under normal conditions water cannot flow to the second tributary. ... View more

@dcoll86 the add-in was compiled and is provided as is with ArcGIS Pro 3.5. If you want to use it in a different version or have any issues with the tool, you will need to download and compile the calculate flow arrows community sample to meet your requirements. Having said that, the add-in does work on my ArcGIS Pro 3.6 install. ... View more

@crogis I'm not 100% sure exactly what's going on without seeing exactly what you're doing in your map. I recommend you read these two sources to understand the limitations around the different types of layers and the Add Join tool: Work with subtype group layers and tables—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation Add Join (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation If you think you're within the parameters of what we say we support, please log a case with support so they can step through your workflow with you and see exactly what you're donig. ... View more

The field is updated when you run update subnetwork, but if you're using the standard ArcFM model you will only see that field updated when you run the tool in default. If you are not seeing this, please open a case with support. ... View more

Please log an issue with support for this to get a bug created so you can be notified when we release the patch that correct it. ... View more

@RoswithaLauterbach ah, that makes sense that the relationship wasn't showing up if you weren't including the M:N relationship in the map. M:N relationships, or any other form of attributed relationship, use a table to represent the related data. If it's not included in the service, then the application can't access the table that tells it which features are related. ... View more

If all you're interested in doing is having a single-user database that you can work on locally, then a local geodatabase may be all you need. If you want others in your organization to be able to access the data, you'll need to have shared services shared through ArcGIS Enterprise.  This is especially true if you want to support any sort of web or mobile applications. ... View more

This is a duplicate, although more narrowly scoped, version of this idea: Ability to Remove Asset Types, Change Terminal Con... - Esri Community ... View more

If you have any attribute rules configured on a layer you are running a field calculate on, and you haven't already configured triggering fields to prevent them from firing, that could also be responsible for the slowness you're seeing. ... View more

If you want to model the customer's infrastructure, past the service connection, you can. You would want to create these as devices with a directional terminal configuration (similar to a check valve) so traces would take the directionality of the backflow prevention devices into account. Do you really want to create, and more importantly do you want to maintain, this extra level of detail in your model? If a customer makes changes to the water infrastructure on their side of the connection, will you be notified about this (assuming they properly permit and construct it?). Are you going to be able to extract enough additional business value from this data to offset the cost of data collection and maintenance? ... View more

@SanchezNuñez  That domain defines all the Asset Types for the "Low Distribution Main" Asset Group assigned to the Sewer Device class. If you add a value/description to that domain you are adding an asset type, changing the description of a coded value is renaming an asset type, and removing a code/description from the domain is deleting an asset type. We currently do not support renaming or deleting asset types. ... View more

Can you post a screenshot of the error along with the options you are using for publishing? ... View more