|
POST
|
Have you tried deleting then recreating the spatial index on the layer?
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
179
|
|
POST
|
There is no problem with removing the duplicate feature layers from your map. In the future, you can just add the subtype group layers first, then manually add the rest of the layers from the service (utility network, service territory, etc).
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
287
|
|
POST
|
Because you are using branch versioning, all your tables have archiving enabled. If you look at the table in the backend you will see all the historical dirty areas in addition to the active dirty areas.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
251
|
|
POST
|
Statistics, indices, and the spatial index are the most common cause of performance issues with drawing that layer. Its also recommended to not draw that layer at small scales (when zoomed out) because of the limited usefulness of the layer when zoomed out and the potential performance hit (even once you've tuned it properly). If you're having problems getting the tuning right, log a case with support.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
215
|
|
POST
|
There are many different ways to get this information, depending on which API you're using (arcpy.Describe for ArcPy, getDefinition for Pro SDK, etc). In a services-based environment it all ends up in a call to get the schema/definition from the FeatureServer/queryDataElements operation. You can do this manually by passing in the layer id of your utility network. This is the REST endpoint equivalent of Arcpy.Describe.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
262
|
|
POST
|
Look at the UN data element you can get the terminal IDs associated with each asset type, that will let you build up the schema of what terminals IDs you have available for analysis. If you want your tool to be sensitive to the context and connectivity of a specific feature, then you'll need to look at the from/todeviceterminalid fields on the line or the associations table. Running a trace to get the terminal ids used for connectivity create a sort of paradox, where you need to run a trace to get the terminal ID to create a trace location to run a trace. and as you noted its slow.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
288
|
|
POST
|
@TristanBest if you use copy/paste or the copy geoprocessing tool to copy your data into the file geodatabase it will preserve your subtypes and domains.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
331
|
|
POST
|
@TristanBest what Worksheets or Workbooks are you expecting to see that aren't being created? The additional tabs (worksheets) in each workbook (file) are based on the domains in your source data. If your source data doesn't have any domains, then you won't get any by default. If you need to do translation you can always use the global mapping sheet, or create your own worksheets from scratch to do the translation.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
340
|
|
POST
|
If you disable and re-enable the network topology, does that fix the error?
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
395
|
|
POST
|
This is currently working as designed, in that the modify terminal assignment tool allows you to manually assign terminal connections to whichever pipes you want. Especially in the case of a device with a directional terminal configuration the system cannot know which side is upstream/downstream. There are quite a few legitimate scenarios in several industries where you can have more than one line connected to the same terminal. This is why we don't create a topology error. You could create a validation rule to check for this situation. You are welcome to create separate ideas for any enhancements you want to see, and the team can evaluate them.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
233
|
|
POST
|
@TristanBest The tool will create the sheet based on your current model, and your job is to fill out the lookupsheet, keys, etc to show the tools how to translate your current data model to the target data model.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
403
|
|
POST
|
@gis_KIWI4 is correct. The data reference/mapping sheets generated by the tools are unique to your data. The tables, fields, and domains are based on your data, not the local government model used in the tutorial.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
449
|
|
POST
|
We are saying the same thing, so I'll try my response in a different way. You cannot remove any asset groups or asset types from the utility network. This means that if you unassign a domain then assign a different domain and any of the codes or descriptions are different, it will fail and you will get this message. We do plan on allowing you to change descriptions of asset types/groups in later releases, but there is still not a timeline on adding support for removing codes.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
148
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | Saturday |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 hours ago
|