Latest Contributions by RobertKrisher

Correct, a terminal configuration cannot be modified once created. You can set a terminal configuration of an asset type, but it cannot be modified. While these restrictions might be loosened in the future (with additional checks, safeguards, and specific restrictions) this currently requires going back to an asset package.

Glad you got it working! The trace should always have been working, but if you were relying on update subnetwork then my guess is you were working in a version and not on default.

Once you've created the network attribute you must assign it to each field/class you want to associate with that network attribute then you must ensure that the field on each class is populated with the desired values.

When you run the trace, where does it stop? What is the phasing of the transformer? Can you post a screenshot of the subnetwork definition for this tier from the network properties dialog? You have a non-standard model, so I want to see how your propagators are configured? You'll need to scroll all the way to the right to see these properties:

Not currently. If there isn't already an idea for this, please create one.

Without any special configuration a 3-phase service connected to a 2-phase transformer will still be energized, but only the two phases from the transformer will be energized. Most models are configured to only include medium voltage lines in the subnetwork line (for performance reasons), but just because the line isn't included in the subnetwork line doesn't mean it doesn't belong to the subnetwork or that its not included in calculations for the subnetwork. If the trace is stopping at the transformer and not continuing to the secondary, its because something else is wrong. There is a new network category being added with UN v8 called propagator resetter that allows you to handle scenarios like this. When this network category is assigned to an asset type, like an open delta or step transformer, the trace will reset the propagated values (phasing) when passing through one of these devices. This should allow all three phases of the service to be energized. You can learn more about propagator resetters here: https://doc.esri.com/en/arcgis-pro/latest/help/data/utility-network/attribute-propagation.html#JDZ

A condition barrier will prevent the trace from identifying sources, while filter barriers are used to identify candidate features to act as isolation equipment. For what you are trying to do, you want to configure a filter barrier. I'm just restating what @gis_KIWI4 said in a way that makes sense to me. To be clear, there is no 'internal logic' or behavior of the UN with regards to condition barriers/filter barriers. We will only evaluate the attributes that are configured in the form. There are default condition barriers that are included in subnetwork definitions that are populated when you configure an isolation trace, but these are configurable and can be modified at will so therefore are not 'internal'.

@KokilaM Have you populated the phasing fields of the circuit breaker and conductor? If there isn't any phasing on the breaker it won't energize the subnetwork.

Do any of your versions have conflicts? If so, the previous ancestor moment of the version will be reported. Based on your comments here it sounds like you've already reviewed the Referenced moments topic in the ArcGIS Online Help.

@AmberY A being connected to B is the same as B being connected to A, so there is no concept of parent/child when it comes to connectivity. This is not the case of containment or attachment where the From feature must be the container or structure and the To feature is the content.

‎05-10-2026

The log you have attached shows the Copy Fields option unchecked, which means there shouldn't have been any fields added to the asset package when the migration workspace was created. This makes me wonder if you're looking at the wrong migration workspace. If you run the tool multiple times with the same output folder/name it will change the output name and location instead of overwriting the workspace.

‎05-09-2026

If you're interested in a view only copy, and your data is small enough, have you considered just copying the feature dataset out to a file or mobile geodatabase and uploading that? If you're seeing specific errors with synchronizing/collaboration with a one-way collaboration, please open issues with support so we can get the process improved.

‎05-08-2026

That's something you'd need to reach out to support on. The original issue that was logged was actually fixed last year, but this separate issue was separate out because there is also a branch versioning specific aspect to this.

‎05-08-2026

The order of the from/to asset group/type in a connectivity rule doesn't matter. This only matter when creating attachment or containment rules, where the from type is the parent.

‎05-07-2026

Can you replicate this behavior by running the same trace inside ArcGIS Pro? Does this only happen when the fuse has terminals?

Online Status	Online
Date Last Visited	5 hours ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by RobertKrisher

Re: Downstream Trace - Sewer Utility Network

Re: How Do You Model A 2ph Transformer Bank That Produces 3ph Secondary Service?

Re: Isolation Trace - Skip Certain Control Valves Based on Attribute / Ground Condition

Re: How Do You Model A 2ph Transformer Bank That Produces 3ph Secondary Service?

Re: Solutions for Creating Schema Diagrams

Re: How Do You Model A 2ph Transformer Bank That Produces 3ph Secondary Service?

Re: Isolation Trace - Skip Certain Control Valves Based on Attribute / Ground Condition

Re: Update Subnetwork not updating Isconnected and Subnetwork Name

Re: Prune Branch History gives earliest moment as the creation date of the dataset

Re: Create Network Rule for JJ Association

Re: Exclude Copy Fields Not Honored When Using Create Migration Workspace UDMS 3.5.0

Re: UN + ArcGIS Online: Stable View-Only Layer Workflow?

Re: Utility Network Shape Length and ArcGIS Dashboards

Re: Create Network Rule for JJ Association

Re: Setting IncludeBarriersWithResults to FALSE does not seem to work

Re: How to determine Version Name from OnPost WebH...

Re: Combine Utility Network and File GDB into one

Re: 14 Million Associations - Best way to load to ...

Re: Association Roles/New Rules

Re: ERROR 003856:* The max value of the domain exc...

European Utility Network Community (UNC)

APAC Utilities Community of Practice