|
POST
|
Lines don't need to be split in order to have connectivity in the utility network, and the Water Utility Network Foundation is configured to allow for connectivity at any vertex along the line. Asset types can be configured with an Edge connectivity policy that controls whether connectivity is allowed at any vertex or only at the endpoints, so if you add any new line asset types you need to remember to set an appropriate edge connectivity policy (the default is end vertex only).
... View more
05-27-2026
07:58 AM
|
0
|
1
|
506
|
|
POST
|
When this happens you should look at the locks in the database and see who else has a lock on that version. Read the Manage geodatabase locks topic in the online help to learn more.
... View more
05-27-2026
05:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
709
|
|
POST
|
The Path trace doesn't use subnetworks. This means that it shouldn't be used when subnetworks, propagation, or directional terminal configuration would affect the outcome of a trace. Its also designed to evaluate multiple paths and choose the most suitable path. If you evaluate each domain using that criteria you'll see that electric distribution networks are not suitable for the Path trace. The Path trace is useful for Telecom or other networks where you have a significant amount of indeterminate flow you need to evaluate (gas, water, electric transmission).
... View more
05-27-2026
05:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
319
|
|
POST
|
The Migration Wizard creates a brand new database, schema, and loads the data each time it is run. If all you need to do is reload one or two feature classes, or you've made changes to the schema or data, it is best to use the data loading workspace created by the tool to reload just the desired tables. This is discussed in some detail in the Expanding on the Migrate to the utility network tool community article.
... View more
05-27-2026
05:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
341
|
|
POST
|
@angiexx1 Doing a Path trace is an electric network is not recommended because it will ignore the flow direction of terminals and your sources. Having said that, its probably not finding a path because either your max hops is too low or the features belong to different circuits (i.e. there is no traversable path between the two points).
... View more
05-26-2026
06:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
343
|
|
POST
|
@AnneYvonneBlin Do you have any ideas about what could be going wrong?
... View more
05-25-2026
09:53 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1391
|
|
POST
|
@DavidColey if it works in Pro and it works standalone then that's what matters from a bug perspective. I'm not familiar with how to configure IDLE and what could be causing issues there.
... View more
05-22-2026
10:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
421
|
|
POST
|
@DavidColey Ok, so now I have two more questions: does it run from inside ArcGIS Pro and does it run in the script you use for your nightly task?
... View more
05-22-2026
08:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
936
|
|
POST
|
A few more clarifying questions; 1. You said: "The validate is being called from a python script using the database owner account on the DEFAULT version". You're running the Validate Network Topology tool against a service right? So presumably you're running it as the Portal Dataset Owner account (DB Owner account implies you're running it using a SDE connection). 2. Are you using something in the UN Tools or UDMS in your validation script? Or were you just explaining why you had a cloned Conda environment, which appears to be the cause of the issue.
... View more
05-22-2026
07:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
961
|
|
POST
|
Definitely log a case with support, if there's aren't any other sessions validating default you shouldn't be seeing that error. It is interesting that you get the error with an ArcGIS Pro 3.7 client, but not an ArcGIS Pro 3.6 client.
... View more
05-22-2026
05:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
977
|
|
POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro each network diagram has its own set of layer definitions, which is essentially its own map. When you are creating a web map to view network diagrams in the web, you should ensure the web map you're using has a similar set of symbology and label expressions. You could try opening the network diagram in ArcGIS Pro, pointing the layers at the feature service for your network diagrams, fixing any issues with labeling/symbology, then publishing that as a web map used by your network diagram viewer app. Are you using a custom application to view the network diagrams in the web?
... View more
05-22-2026
05:51 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1530
|
|
POST
|
@DavidColey I'd start by logging a case with support since it may be a bug. If no one else is validating default on the server then you shouldn't see this error. How are you calling validate? Does validating manually via ArcGIS Pro or a geoprocessing tool work? Does this error happen immediately, or does it take a little while? Presumably this is in default, or is this in a named verion?
... View more
05-21-2026
05:04 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1049
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the info! It looks like this could be BUG-000184727, which is currently scheduled to be included in the next 11.3 patch. Support should be able to confirm the details of the bug, patch, etc. especially if you have a reproducible test case.
... View more
05-21-2026
04:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
379
|
|
POST
|
I don't see any append statement sin here. Is it possible you had the "Load Data" box unchecked?
... View more
05-21-2026
08:03 AM
|
0
|
7
|
974
|
|
POST
|
@EdwardBlair if you really need to hide that feature you can add an output condition to the trace that will explicitly hide it. In this case, adding an output condition where the category is not equal to E:Fuse. I apologize for using screenshots of water data for this issue, I was having issues finding a spot in the electric project I was using where the fuses had terminals.
... View more
05-21-2026
07:15 AM
|
1
|
1
|
677
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 hours ago | |
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | Monday |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 hours ago
|