|
BLOG
|
" You can use whatever you want for the prefix- that was put in place just to decrease the likelihood that an existing table would be getting overwritten by the script." Is there a way to disable this? I want the results to go into an existing table, e.g, we might change the name of the survey from year to year, or want to pump multiple surveys (same schema, different workgroups) into the same table.
... View more
03-26-2018
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
17253
|
|
IDEA
|
CartoDB allows direct export to a SQLite table, so this concept isn't exactly new.
... View more
03-23-2018
07:07 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6726
|
|
POST
|
"Why is there no Servers folder in the Catalog pane by default?". I've wondered about that myself. It definitely adds more time, and slows up your workflow, when you have to add that one-time-use server that isn't part of a template or a favorite. In Arc Catalog, "Add ArcGIS Server" is right there.
... View more
03-17-2018
06:44 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5091
|
|
POST
|
This was pretty handy in Arc Map, unclear as to why it would have been left out in Pro, or why all the extra steps. Be sure to vote on https://community.esri.com/ideas/13398-fit-to-margins-in-arcgis-pro
... View more
03-14-2018
07:38 AM
|
2
|
0
|
12576
|
|
POST
|
Yes, I was able to add Mapbox tiles to an AGOL map, then open the map in Pro. But there is no direct way to add tiles as a layer to a Pro map, which is an unfortunate lack of a feature (can't do it in Arc either, to be fair).
... View more
03-14-2018
07:34 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1452
|
|
POST
|
Would be helpful if there was a list of logged enhancement requests, as well.
... View more
03-10-2018
07:38 AM
|
1
|
3
|
14729
|
|
POST
|
Many folks will not have access to the download files in My ESRI if the org is big enough. See https://community.esri.com/ideas/14635-pro-service-packs-should-indicate-if-cumulative-they-should-be-anyway?sr=inbox&ru=45316 and https://community.esri.com/thread/210505-does-212-need-be-installed-on-top-of-211?sr=inbox&ru=6989
... View more
03-10-2018
07:36 AM
|
0
|
1
|
888
|
|
POST
|
Tripp, I think the universal issue in this an other "performance" threads, is, we're not seeing these issues doing the same thing with the same data sources using Arc Map. And how realistic is "putting Pro on a Virtual Desktop Machine"?
... View more
03-08-2018
06:30 AM
|
3
|
1
|
5085
|
|
POST
|
There is a bug on this, the workaround is to (re)publish to root, then move the item to the folder, same problem with AGOL, but I don't see this being fixed, developers hate spaces, so do I, but they're what I inherited....., with that said, Arc can (re)publish to folders with spaces, so.....equivalency issue?
... View more
03-07-2018
10:53 AM
|
2
|
1
|
6870
|
|
POST
|
https://community.esri.com/ideas/14635-pro-service-packs-should-indicate-if-cumulative-they-should-be-anyway
... View more
03-01-2018
05:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3962
|
|
POST
|
Hmmmmm. I think ESRI is under the mistaken impression that all users are going to have the admin rights necessary to hit that update button, when the opposite is the reality. I think IT subscribes to the release updates because they mysteriously don't answer the phone around the same time. In a future world, by the time we get SP.X installed (1 year after release), SP.Y and Z have been released. I'd like to be in a scenario where I just wait for Z, and roll up X and Y in the process. If that's no longer the case, that goes against what most software producers practice. Can you imagine if you have to install every SQL CU in ordinal order? I'm also under the naïve impression that I'm going to be able to roll Pro out using one of those magic deployment tools (my fault, not ESRI's, I've never gotten that to work). So your install says 2.1.2, but can you tell if the 2.1.1 fixes got applied?
... View more
03-01-2018
04:58 AM
|
0
|
9
|
3962
|
|
POST
|
If I were slipstreaming service packs into an admin install, can I put 2.1.2 on top of 2.1 and it will roll up 2.1.1, or do I need to slipstream 2.1.1 first (which would be a pain....)?
... View more
02-28-2018
12:39 PM
|
1
|
20
|
9246
|
|
IDEA
|
Nothing is more frustrating than connecting to Portal, AGOL, or GIS Server in Pro, adding a feature service, only to find that "Sync" in "Map" is disabled. Sure would be nice if in the Catalog View (Pane?), some doohickey (Icon? Color? New Column?) indicated if the feature service met the requirements for "Offline Editing" and/or sync. Expand this to show if "Maps" also meet the requirements. I manage several hundred feature services across all platforms, having a hard time keeping track of the one's I've updated for sync capability, the ones where I've tried and it failed, or the ones where HFS's have similar names, but only one is offline capable. I'd like to be able to have users easily identify those HFS's that are ready for offline editing.
... View more
02-27-2018
08:50 AM
|
4
|
1
|
1287
|
|
BLOG
|
Seriously? That's a real email? That's as bad as Romney's "The other 46%" speech....
... View more
02-27-2018
07:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
14272
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-17-2022 12:19 PM | |
| 1 | 03-14-2019 06:24 AM | |
| 1 | 07-12-2018 09:29 AM | |
| 1 | 06-27-2019 12:08 PM | |
| 2 | 09-23-2019 11:03 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-26-2026
07:12 AM
|