Latest Contributions by FraserHand

Hi, the easiest way to do this if the new machine is on the same network / can talk to the existing machine is to set up HA, fail over then remove the old machine. The process is described here Migrate to new machines—Portal for ArcGIS | Documentation for ArcGIS Enterprise I've done this a few times now and find it easier than trying to use webgisdr. I make sure machines are patched to the same level before hand though. ... View more

Thanks for pointing me to that post. I've subscribed to that place so will keep an eye on it. Cheers! ... View more

Hi, Sorry - what I'm asking is when it is going to be part of core and replace the current 3.x viewer. As the default viewer. Thanks ... View more

Hi Derek, It's 10.8.1 - upgraded from 10.5.1. All patches applied. This is using the default ArcGIS Dashboard App built into the Enterprise Portal. Thanks Fraser ... View more

Hi Jon, I have found a solution to this. I kept circling back to the web adaptors as this was the only difference between a site that the offline packaging was working and the Azure site which wasn't. The App gateway sets X-Forwarded-Host as described here: Configure your portal to use a reverse proxy server—Portal for ArcGIS (10.8) | Documentation for ArcGIS Enterprise - however when looking at the web adaptor you can see that it sets further custom headers when handling requests mainly: X-Forwarded-Url-Base: web adaptor context X-Forwarded-Request-Context: this appears to be the same as the web context url setting webAdaptorID: web adaptor id X-Forwarded-For: an external ip I added these to my App GW and the offline packaging began working - including being able to create offline areas in Collector.  Note I could see the response from the GIS Server change from something like  https://external url/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisoutput/Test/Imagery_MapServer/_ags62661154_ch/Map.tpk to  https://external url/design/rest/directories/arcgisoutput/Test/Imagery_MapServer/_ags62661154_ch/Map.tpk So it looks like the GIS Server uses the X-Forwarded-Request-Context to write the response rather than the WebContextURL system setting. It appears that if the X-Forwarded-Request-Context header isn't set then it falls back to /arcgis/ - I don't know if this is intended or not but - I had a quick look through the online documentation and couldn't find these headers documented. I naturally assumed that the GIS Server would use the WebContextURL setting for any responses (including responses in GP results or API calls)  before any custom headers as not all users use web adaptors - and in the Esri Azure cloud automation tools web adaptors aren't used - and these additional headers aren't set in the App GW configuration (at 10.8 anyway). Bruce Harold‌ - looping you in as you were tagged in the original post Trevor Hart‌ Scott Tansley‌ ... View more

Hi Dallas, We aren't using objectid or globalid for PK / FK due to some other limitations we have - so the attribute rule just uses the Arcade function Guid() to generate a new guid for the key. Thanks ... View more

Sorry - one more - I'm assuming you do something like this right: return { 'result': noAddress + ' addresses found in the district.', 'edit': [{ 'className': 'Address_pnts', 'updates': AddList }] } As in for your inspection you are adding predefined values for the fields - the user in offline mode cannot edit the related table record unless its using objectid or globalid as the PK / FK Thanks! ... View more

Taking a look at the link: However, if you edit the data while offline, the attribute rule information is not included in the offline data. When you synchronize the data with the feature layer, the rules are applied at that time. I'm using a rule to generate an Id with is used as the PK and FK for a relationship. Since this isn't evaluated offline it doesn't look like this workflow will work for me. We had tested online and it was ok. Thanks ... View more

Hi Dallas, Thanks for the reply. I had a simple rule which returned a guid(); for both the feature class and related table. I tried with the exclude option on and off and when offline the rule wouldn't calculate. We tried with Android and iOS. Can you share an example of one of your rules? Would be good to see what I'm missing. Thanks Fraser ... View more