Latest Contributions by MaazaMekuria

Hi, Mickael: You are right that the data returned ahs a different email instead of what you requested.  But I am putting the database hat and think through the query, I see inconsistency in the parameters.  If the globalid is a unique identification, there should not be a second parameter needed to pull the correct record from the list or table.  So the email variable is superficial.  What I am wondering now is that your table has duplicate globalid's?  This is a violation of the unique constraint on the field itslef, so the behavior of the query result is not going to be predictable. Would you please check to see whether the globalid field is set as unique identifier and that it does not contain duplicates.  Y9ou should only need the unique id to query the right record to be edited. I am sure some of the ESRI developers could shed more light on this issue than I could.  ... View more

I am sorry if I did not understand your question.  Are you saying that you passed the globalid field data and could not get the appropriate record due to the field being hidden?  I think you are saying that it does not get the correct record at all.   I think it does get something specific, but if you see the query to the first question i responded, and it has the global id field value within the query and it is able to bring up a record to be edited.  If that is not the right one then there is a bug in the program to not be able to locate the appropriate record.    Regardless whether in edit mode or not it should either bring up the correct record or nothing at all.  Otherwise this will cause harm to all. Thank you for the followup.   ... View more

Hello, Whitney, I am doing nothing other than following the syntax for the query (whether edit or not) and here is what I did to your second edit url  (except that the gelobalid in the query was not avaialable and was set as a variable so I could not get to the particular record  and a generic data was returned) https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/8357afa6eb3e4dc4bd1d5464c649e481?mode=edit&version=latest&status=Submitted the response is here  If this is not what you would like to see then perhaps I did not grasp your problem. One more thing here, I think the query parameters are changing perhaps as we speak and the latest version (3.9+ ) maybe going in a the direction of adding a "field:" identifier to each field etc.  But it seems to now work with just the name and value pair.   ... View more

Hello, Mickael: I think if you get rid of the "field:" the URL https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/9fd130fc234e4dafa47337539c3f9fc2?mode=edit&globalId=3a540195-0650-493b-82c3-4fdd7452bf41&field:[email protected]  It should work. https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/9fd130fc234e4dafa47337539c3f9fc2?mode=edit&globalId=3a540195-0650-493b-82c3-4fdd7452bf41&[email protected] works for me. ... View more

Hello, James, I had raised the same question before and have given a set of scenarios that would make multi-point desirable geometry.  We are a transportation services agency and perform inventory of multiple assets.  Even though sometimes it would make sense to keep these assets in individual features, there are many instances that would make it easier to aggregate points.  One instance where multipoint geometry are a perfect fit and nothing else comes near is when one wants locations of a project where exactly the same treatment is carried out on multiple geographically (spatially) dispersed area.  The current solution is to have many point features that have the same attributes, we would like to have all the locations under one feature.  You may say, what about repeat points?  That is what we want to avoid! the extra management challenge associated with repeats is eliminated for many instances if there was a possibility of multi-point geometry store.  Some of the projects currently in our system include replacing sign posts along a roadway.   The work is exactly the same and the project has several hundred locations.  Multi-Point feature would be just a solution that fits the need.  I am bit surprised by the delay in having a multipoint geometry as part of the arsenal!  It is after all  a polyline without the line, that would make it lighter and easier to maintain.  Why is it so difficult to have this feature when even shapefiles have multipoint geometry? There are many use cases but I think the flexibility to have one more toolset in solving varied problems is worth the little effort it takes to add multipoint geometry. Thank you,  ... View more

Any possibility that multipoint geometry will be available in addition to point, line and polygon as a geometry type?  ... View more

hello, Oussama, I think you just need to change the "objectid" to "objectId".  it is case sensitive. ... View more

Hello, Timothy : Linking Op Dashboard and the form must share the same Object Id, which means they share the same feature class.  You can generate a from from feature class by setting the design to be based on a feature service.  Then use the object id to link the form and dashboard while embedding the form into the dashboad.   ... View more

Is there any update after two years on the ability to publish surveys on command line or batch? ... View more

Thank you,  James, for the reply.  I think you did not understand what I was saying.  I am saying that, I lost a whole set of diectories in the my designs forlder in a twinkling of an eye aka an infinitesimal  moment whithoiut me doing any deleting action myself.  I couldn't also find it in the recycle bin!  This is terrible to happen, regardless of my being able to download all those that are already published.  I .ost some that are not published yet with all the published documents. Again, I appreciate your helpful response.  ... View more