|
IDEA
|
One way to solicit feedback from external collaborators on a StoryMap is to send them the URL to the story, along with login credentials for a temporary account on the organization hosting the story. If a collaborator happens to be logged into their own, different ArcGIS Online organization in their browser, and they click on the link to open the story, then they are directed to the generic "Hmm... there seems to be an issue" page. Users often do not understand the "issue" is that the account they are already logged into does not have permission to view the story. (They can -- but typically don't know to -- use an incognito/private browser window or logout of their account first, and then open the link.) Perhaps when a logged-in user visits a StoryMap URL to which they do not have access, then the system could provide that information clearly as the error message, and guidance on how to potentially resolve the issue. For example, it could let the user know that "Your account does not have permission to access to this story," and offer the user an option to login with different credentials or switch accounts.
... View more
01-09-2024
07:18 AM
|
2
|
2
|
930
|
|
IDEA
|
I'll add that the ArcGIS Online documentation around shared update groups further complicates this issue. Even when you do grant all of your users a custom role that enables them to create shared update groups, then you still occasionally have users who don't realize they are empowered to do so. They send a request to the Administrators, as the documentation suggests they need to be an "Administrator" to create such groups.
... View more
12-18-2023
02:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2612
|
|
IDEA
|
@Bud the "Copy Python Command" is another option that partially addresses your need. It gets around the not wanting to run the tool limitation, as you can fill things out and copy without having to run the tool. It does, however, fall victim to pre-errors; if an error is present, then Copy Python Command is grayed out.
... View more
12-14-2023
09:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1898
|
|
POST
|
Wonder if you might be using a pre-2.2.0 version of the ArcGIS for Python API, which would not include the email_text parameter? (What's new in version 2.2.0?)
... View more
12-07-2023
11:58 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2824
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro supports exporting a map as a PDF with some interactivity. While a capability like that it Pro would not support all of the great ways one can interact with a map in StoryMaps, it would serve well when the interactivity requirements are simple. For example, when presenting a set of features with popups for a reader to explore embedded in a story. In a PDF reader, like Adobe Acrobat, a person would be able to read the story, and interact with the map by selecting features and viewing their attributes, and seeing the feature highlighted on the map. For example, in this map of trees in a city park, exported from Pro, a user can browse the list of trees and select one to view its attributes and its location on the map. While our user interest in this capability is for StoryMaps, I'm sure it would be a welcome addition to the Map Viewer as well, and I would guess it would have to be implemented in Online first, so available broadly, including to StoryMaps?
... View more
12-07-2023
05:50 AM
|
2
|
1
|
1342
|
|
DOC
|
@BBarbs @JakeSkinner I would recommend replacing the explicit references to OBJECTID with the feature layer property, objectIdField. That will ensure you are using the correct field for that particular feature layer, regardless of what the actual name is.
... View more
12-06-2023
12:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
26320
|
|
POST
|
As this Question was closed as Solved, I would recommend people interested in this functionality add their kudos to the Survey123 Idea, Add Support for Apple Pencil in Survey123 for ArcGIS.
... View more
12-06-2023
08:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
602
|
|
IDEA
|
I too would like to see what we set for an Information Banner (when we do have it set) appearing to all of users, regardless of whether they are accessing our system via the web or app.
... View more
11-29-2023
06:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1352
|
|
POST
|
Is there a tentative release date for Arc Hydro 3.2? Or, is Arc Hydro 3.1 compatible with ArcGIS Pro 3.2? We need to upgrade organization-wide to Pro 3.2 to pick up the bug fix for the DUO Universal Prompt, however, we don't want to break things for our Arc Hydro users by doing that.
... View more
11-28-2023
10:29 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1701
|
|
POST
|
Thanks @mollie_webb! Wonder if anyone has been able to confirm that the Duo Universal Prompt bug is also fixed in Pro 3.1.3?
... View more
11-22-2023
06:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1912
|
|
IDEA
|
When a user has taken their Pro Named User license offline, it would be helpful for administrators to be able to determine what machine they did so on. This is needed when the user is seeking guidance on figuring out on what machine they checked out there license. Currently you can go to Organization --> Licenses --> ArcGIS Pro --> View license activity, search for a user, and see that they have a disconnected license. It also shows the day on which they did it. It would be helpful to have the time displayed as well when trying to figure things out. I would also like to see the machine alias of the machine to which they checked out the license displayed here. This Idea would be even better paired with Use machine name as the default workstation alias in ArcGIS Pro to make it easier to track down which machine is involved, as the autogenerated aliases are not always that helpful in identifying an actual machine.
... View more
11-14-2023
06:25 AM
|
4
|
2
|
1274
|
|
BLOG
|
@AmyWork3 I am definitely not an ArcScan wizard, and I'm sure it did more than we every used it for, however, we recently found that Extract Features Using AI Models (Image Analyst) is a helpful substitute in some of our typical workflows. For example, extracting polygons from scanned historic black and white parcel or census division maps. Assuming you are starting from the same kind of 1-band, 1-bit raster you would prepare for ArcScan, then you can run the tool in "only postprocess" mode, and choose Line or Parcel regularization. Like ArcScan, the results are not perfect, however, it also greatly reduces the amount of manual digitization required to generate a final product. It also can benefit from pre-cleaning of the raster, when that takes less effort than post-processing fixes, as did ArcScan, though it lacks the helpful tools ArcScan provided for pre-cleaning.
... View more
10-29-2023
12:35 PM
|
3
|
0
|
6309
|
|
DOC
|
@JakeSkinner this likely only affects a few folks, however, if your Online/Portal has more than 10,000 users, then gis.users.search(max_users=100000) seems to ignore max_users, and still only returns the first 10,000 users. That has been our experience with the ArcGIS Python API up through 2.1.0.2 (the version included with ArcGIS Pro 3.1.3.) Our workaround has been to use gis.users.advanced_search(), and query for users by year of account creation, one year at a time, and aggregate the results. With a warning generated if any of the individual years returns 10,000 results, as that might be a sign that we've hit the hard limit of 10,000 for search, and need a different workaround, such as further reducing the creation time range being queried on each pass.
... View more
10-19-2023
09:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
31979
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 4 | 06-26-2026 01:43 AM | |
| 1 | 06-18-2026 06:19 AM | |
| 3 | 06-05-2026 02:45 PM | |
| 4 | 06-02-2026 06:04 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|