|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.3; Oracle 19c 11.3 EGDB: Attribute Table > right-click a field header > Custom Sort The Fields picklist automatically scrolls down when I hover over the last visible value in the list. That's annoying. I would need to scroll back up to choose the Field I wanted. Could that behaviour be changed? Related: Browse Dialog — Don't scroll down when file/folder clicked
... View more
03-25-2025
12:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
375
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5 Oracle 18c 10.7.1 EGDB; traditional versioning moving edits to base What does the “E” stand for in the autogenerated view "..._EVW" naming convention? I have a vague memory that the E stands for “editioned” views. But that might not be right. "Edit"?
... View more
03-24-2025
07:32 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1987
|
|
POST
|
On the flip side, here is an issue that was a deal breaker for my I.T. department (in conjunction with other issues) when planning to upgrade From Pro 2.9.x to Pro 3.3.5 (Enterprise 11.3). BUG-000171626 Multiple relates defined in a map cannot be published to ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3 due to the error "Map contains multiple relates with the same ID." I.T. has opted to upgrade to Pro 3.4.3 (Enterprise 11.3) instead, since the issue, and other issues, are fixed in Pro 3.4.
... View more
03-24-2025
09:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4026
|
|
IDEA
|
Idea: Contents Pane — Use symbology class/toggles to select features
... View more
03-24-2025
07:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1744
|
|
IDEA
|
Idea: Contents Pane — Use symbology class/toggles to select features
... View more
03-21-2025
12:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3100
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4.2; file geodatabase It would be handy if we could right-click a symbology class in the Contents layer and choose an option that would select those features (the features would be selected in the attribute table/map). Use case: Easily select features without creating an expression (definition query or Select By Attributes) for the purpose of quickly using the selected features in geoprocessing tools. Alternatively, honor multiple symbology toggles by right-clicking the root layer and choosing an option to select all the features that are toggled. Implemented idea: Toggle visibility for individual Categories on Symbology tab
... View more
03-21-2025
11:55 AM
|
5
|
4
|
1674
|
|
IDEA
|
@DrewFlater The one-to-many option is only available if the input and join tables are in the same database, since the joining happens at the database level. FYI Esri Case #03864968 - Pro 3.4.3 - 1:M option missing from Add Join > Join Operation parameter Existing bug report: BUG-000170631: Tables in mobile geodatabase cannot perform a 'Join one to many' using the Add Join tool in ArcGIS Pro. The above also applies to enterprise geodatabase feature classes. As you noted, by default, not selecting any option will result in the software attempting a one to many join. However, the option is not there for choosing.
... View more
03-20-2025
09:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2305
|
|
IDEA
|
Related post: Stack Overflow - Why aren't rows returned in the order of insertion?
... View more
03-19-2025
07:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2321
|
|
IDEA
|
@DrewFlater Thanks for following up. If the related record with the lowest OBJECTID is not used, then what related record does get used? Is it deterministic or arbitrary?
... View more
03-19-2025
02:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2355
|
|
IDEA
|
FYI - In Pro 3.3.5 (Oracle 19c; 11.3 EGDB), the one-to-many option is missing from the Join Operation parameter.
... View more
03-19-2025
06:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2374
|
|
POST
|
Idea: Raster legend labels — Make raster values like elevation the default, not the color bit numbers
... View more
03-17-2025
09:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2541
|
|
IDEA
|
@JesseWickizer Thanks, makes sense. I'd wondered but couldn't put my finger on it.
... View more
03-17-2025
09:17 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1028
|
|
POST
|
Related: Use Select by Attributes to select greatest n records (FGDB)
... View more
03-16-2025
10:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2143
|
|
IDEA
|
Related: Is ArcGIS Pro the right tool for tabular geodatabase analysis? FGDB SQL is too limited to be useful to us.
... View more
03-16-2025
10:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1746
|
|
IDEA
|
The way one-to-first joins work is: Pro grabs the related record with the lowest OBJECTID. So, if a road has a couple of related events, but the event with the lowest OBJECTID is an EVENT_STATUS='INACTIVE' event, then that event will be joined, not the other EVENT_STATUS='ACTIVE' event with the larger OBJECTID. If I had an EVENT_STATUS='ACTIVE' definition query on events prior to creating the join, Pro will automatically apply that definition query to the joined roads table when I create the join. In the example above, the definition query would omit the road entirely because the joined event is INACTIVE. So, that’s what I mean when I say the definition query is performed after the join is performed. I’m looking for a way to filter the table prior to the join being performed so that only ACTIVE events are joined. I don’t want to do a one-to-many join because I want a unique list of roads. If there were a road with multiple ACTIVE events, then that would result in duplicate roads in the attribute table if the join were one-to-many. Related: Add Join — Indicate that a definition query on join table will effectively result in an inner join Add Join — Create independent definition query on join table (pre-filter) One-to-first join — Control what related record gets used
... View more
03-16-2025
10:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1505
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03-20-2026 02:12 PM | |
| 1 | 03-19-2026 11:42 AM | |
| 1 | 06-03-2026 04:02 AM | |
| 1 | 03-18-2026 07:08 PM | |
| 2 | a month ago |