Latest Contributions by Katie_Clark

Would love to have this functionality. I own several thousand items in my AGOL account, and additional folders would definitely help to keep things organized! This functionality would be useful in many ways, but one specific use-case for me would be to have sub-folders within project folders that I would call "Archived". This would be for things that we want to keep hosted in AGOL for people to easily be able to reference, but it's not the current year's map/data. Another option for the above scenario would be to be able to mark something as "Archived" the same way we can mark as Authoritative or Deprecated. But the subfolders idea would be very useful as well, regardless! ... View more

Haha, I totally understand the trepidation.  I'd be interested to hear how it goes! ... View more

We've had users leave our organization before and I've had all of their content (hundreds of items) transferred over to my account. I've simply used the "change ownership" workflow and haven't experienced any issues. As long as sharing stays the same (make sure your new username as access to all the same groups your old username did) then I don't foresee any issues! ... View more

If I'm understanding correctly, it seems like these can be easily sorted/filtered through the attribute table of the survey feature layer and/or an excel output of the survey results. The way you have the questions worded in bold can be the label of your question (omitting the parts in parentheses, per the request), and the name of your question can just be "SLI", "ASD_EBD", "ADHD", etc.  So for example, the column in the attribute table for the SLI question will be populated with either Yes or No values. You can then sort ascending or descending on that column to group all survey answers that answered "Yes" to that question. Is that what you're going for? ... View more

Good point! Agreed, @CarlMorrison , sometimes I use the names interchangeably in my head, but yes, definitely time to be switching to Field Maps instead of Collector! ... View more

Is there a reason you have the users entering the DBH measurements in a single field as a string, rather than using a repeat? In your case, you'd need to use a custom javascript function and separate the numbers using a text delimiter, then access each of those values within the resulting list and perform the calculation that way.  ... View more

Hi!  So, the way I always go about it is share the layer to your AGOL organization (with sync and editing enabled, as you mentioned) and then create a web map with that layer in it within the AGOL web interface. On the web maps Item Details page, you can confirm that it's correctly set up for offline use. Hope that helps! ... View more

Are you still needing help with this? I took a look and noticed a few things that I had questions on before addressing things in the report template. 1. row 10 and 23 of the XLS form appear to have the same field name.  2. After looking at the user interface of the survey, I'm not exactly clear why you decided to have repeats for the equipment and materials sections. It seems to me that they can just be select_multiple questions, and then have additional questions display based on what the user selected, so they can enter quanity, cost, etc. for that particular item they selected.  ... View more

Hi @IsmaelChivite ! Thank you for your response!   For #1, yes I think that would work well as a solution. Either that, or using the "appearance" column, whichever makes more sense. For #2....I posted this idea quite a while ago and I have learned so much since then, including being able to better format data outputs in a custom report template. But thank you so much for clarifying about the "A". It might be helpful to include that particular syntax in the quick reference guide (as you show in your screenshot) as well?  Thanks!   ... View more

Oh, the dynamic feature would be SO useful, as the number of attachments per point isn't consistent in this case. Thanks so much for your response, I'll give this a shot and I look forward to the tool enhancements in the future! ... View more

Sounds like your best bet might be to have hidden questions in the survey that populate with the values that you want in the report. (i.e. a separate hidden field for scientific name vs. common name).  ... View more