Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About Jens_Dalsgaard
Jens_Dalsgaard
Frequent Contributor
since
12-08-2015
03-09-2026
94
Posts created
69
Kudos given
3
Solutions
135
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(7 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by Jens_Dalsgaard
|
POST
|
Hi there Assume I have associations stating that assembly A contains assembly B in turn containing device C will having assembly A also contain device C directly (somewhat circular references) be allowed / problematic? Best regards Jens Dalsgaard
... View more
02-28-2023
07:34 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1530
|
|
POST
|
Oh, yeah - the answer is obvious with your reply, Robert. You cleared my vision. Thanks. And Mike - we're not immediately planning on connecting the edge object to any features in the map. The immediate objective is to group line features. But now that you've asked, I think I should ask Elvia about this. It would actually be obvious to connect this edge object to assembly features delineating it (using JJCA's). Thank you guys for swift answers. See, got a lot more out of asking than looking myself 😉
... View more
02-17-2023
04:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1273
|
|
POST
|
Hi there The edge objects tabular line representation (without any actual line geometry) may be used to document e.g., individual fibers in a fiber cable. In this case the edge objects will be contained. You may say the edge object in this case inherits the geometry of the container. Is it possible to have an edge object act as container containing e.g. electric cables? Yeah I know - I could do a quick test, but asking here is quicker 😉 and might even bring knowledgeable input to me. BR JD
... View more
02-16-2023
03:50 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1310
|
|
POST
|
According to Mike, classes must be m-enabled. But you don't have to do anything with the m-enablement. At least, we don't, and still it works like a beauty. Maybe, we'll end up using the m-enablement further down the line, but for a start we don't.
... View more
02-06-2023
10:09 PM
|
1
|
0
|
3146
|
|
POST
|
Have experience in electric utility and UN only. Yet, I am quite sure, that m-enablement is NOT needed.
... View more
01-31-2023
09:48 AM
|
1
|
2
|
3187
|
|
POST
|
I would say, that the answer to this depends very much on the maturity of the existing ArcGIS geometric network data. If it is simpler grid representation with simpler business process support, then simpler migration tools / objectives may be used. If on the other hand the source represents a true digital twin supporting advanced business processes, then you should aim for something with more capabilities hence delivering immediate business value generation upon migrated data. Allow me to refer to a post on what I mean when speaking of digital twin: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/migrating-arcgis-utility-network-jens-dalsgaard/ Best regards Jens Dalsgaard
... View more
01-31-2023
08:01 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1704
|
|
BLOG
|
No offense. I think you should have some technical writer do this explanation. Someone not having your deep understanding 😉 This sentence requires a higher exam in negation interpretation: The item specified in the row will not be added or applied to the output when this category is unchecked only if it is not set to Evaluated in any other category that is checked on.
... View more
01-26-2023
05:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3341
|
|
POST
|
Stacked Junctions is likely the error (dirty area) that you will encounter with such data. UN is unforgiving on this (as it is with duplicate vertices, self-intersecting lines, etc.) You will need to create a program that displaces some of these features (e.g., an inch into the air) whist maintaining correct connectivity.
... View more
01-16-2023
10:25 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1109
|
|
POST
|
Will do so through the Elvia Premium Support (as it is related to / documented on Elvia UN data). Thanks for feedback, Mike.
... View more
11-30-2022
02:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6857
|
|
POST
|
OK, thanks for the feedback, Mike. Where may I read more on this bug, and what is the priority / time-frame on fixing it?
... View more
11-26-2022
08:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6907
|
|
POST
|
By the way - allow me to mention that performing a similar downstream trace from the HV/MV transformer in a migration from a different source using the exact same asset package template the trace propagates nicely into the low voltage mesh. Hence, I doubt it has anything to do with the schema / data model configuration.
... View more
11-23-2022
10:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
7009
|
|
POST
|
We're using the UNC data model from the Utility Network Community. John Alsup / Mike Miller know it. I will send information about tiers and terminals tomorrow.
... View more
11-23-2022
11:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
7025
|
|
POST
|
I experience inexplicable and inconsistent downstream trace results. I have really tried myself understanding what is going on - I do not get it though. From a high voltage substation (HV/MV) I set a trace start flag on the secondary winding on one of the transformers and request a downstream trace - se screen dump below: As the trace is set to continue into low voltage (target tier), of course I would expect the trace to do so. In the below screen dump, you see that it does not continue into the low voltage mesh (blue lines): And zooming into a medium voltage substation (MV/LV) it is clear that the trace stops at the MV/LV transformer - se screen shot below: Really strange, cause I have successfully run an update subnetworks on the low voltage mesh, so I know that the trace from this transformer and downstream should work. Now, moving the trace start point (from the HV/MV transformer secondary) to just outside this substation and running the exact same trace I reach this inconsistent result that you see below - the trace continuing through the MV/LV transformer and into the low voltage mesh as configured in the GP: Enlighten me please, Esri (or someone else). I cannot see me doing anything wrong here - I might though. Or UN might have a bug? One thing is for sure - you have a puzzled user.
... View more
11-23-2022
06:53 AM
|
1
|
11
|
8455
|
|
POST
|
If what you need is to visualize the trace result at a higher scale, ask yourself if you actually need to show the features at this higher scale. If not, the answer to your need may be to simply output the trace result as Aggregated Lines - a graphic element built with the geometries of the trace result. Such graphic element will not be turned off a higher scales (unless you actually do something to make the do so).
... View more
11-16-2022
05:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1913
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 03-03-2026 05:24 AM | |
| 2 | 02-26-2026 02:15 AM | |
| 1 | 09-05-2025 02:34 AM | |
| 2 | 08-19-2025 04:36 AM | |
| 1 | 01-31-2023 08:01 AM |
Activity Feed
- Got a Kudo for Attribute rule arcade expression calling webservice and processing result. 04-12-2026 11:43 PM
- Posted Re: Isolation trace - Simulate whatifs scenarios on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-09-2026 11:49 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan To. 03-07-2026 08:21 AM
- Kudoed Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan To for HanliePetoors. 03-04-2026 01:00 AM
- Posted Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan To on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-04-2026 12:59 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan To. 03-03-2026 07:42 AM
- Posted Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan To on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-03-2026 05:24 AM
- Kudoed Save the Date: 2026 annual European Electric User Group meeting in the Netherlands! for LydiaStekkinger. 03-03-2026 05:16 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Electric Radial Partitioned Tier Source– Why Are Loops Not Flagged as Errors?. 03-03-2026 01:23 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Electric Radial Partitioned Tier Source– Why Are Loops Not Flagged as Errors?. 03-02-2026 12:20 PM
- Posted Re: Electric Radial Partitioned Tier Source– Why Are Loops Not Flagged as Errors? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 02-26-2026 02:15 AM
- Got a Kudo for Subnetwork coloring. 02-09-2026 01:10 PM
- Kudoed Seperation of UN Data Ownership and privileges for specific UN-based tasks for SteffenMarkert2. 02-05-2026 04:30 AM
- Kudoed Re: Inconsistency between Subnetline et Subnetwork status for PierreloupDucroix. 12-18-2025 12:50 AM
- Got a Kudo for Attribute rule arcade expression calling webservice and processing result. 12-16-2025 11:57 AM
- Posted Re: Detecting split operation on ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Ideas. 12-02-2025 04:31 AM
- Kudoed Long running Batch Attribute Rule or mark table as validated? for askervolue. 11-20-2025 03:12 AM
- Posted Detecting split operation on ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Ideas. 11-18-2025 11:39 PM
- Got a Kudo for Attribute rule arcade expression calling webservice and processing result. 11-13-2025 07:56 PM
- Kudoed Manage access to saved trace configs for different user groups for GKing. 09-21-2025 01:15 AM
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-09-2026
11:50 AM
|