|
POST
|
Reading some of your other posts, I get the impression that you're already well into UN. You have a fully functional UN and 'simply' want to replicate this. Or what. My answer was given - sorry about that - based on the assumption that you thought - as I do find some thinking - that you can simply move data into ArcGIS UN and utility network will work. You're not there. 🙂
... View more
01-20-2025
06:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1501
|
|
POST
|
Re-reading your question I ask myself whether you're actually asking about migrating from one UN database to another UN database. In that case, why wouldn't you use standard ArcGIS GP's? E.g. https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-solutions/latest/tool-reference/utility-network-package/export-asset-package.htm
... View more
01-20-2025
01:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1519
|
|
POST
|
Migrating to ArcGIS Utility Network is COMPLEX and it seems unlikely that a dump will accommodate ArcGIS UN requirements. A dump at best would be the start of a migration process where data is transformed to comply to UN requirements.
... View more
01-20-2025
01:31 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1521
|
|
IDEA
|
Referring to this ArcGIS Utility Network Question https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/connectivity-trace-setting-up-combined-condition/m-p/1569491#M4697 I hereby suggest a change. In the above-mentioned question, @MikeMillerGIS states that the behaviour is as designed. I urge a change in this design then, so that setup condition barriers may work across all tiers rather than only within the initial tier. I honestly do not see when I would want condition barriers working only on the initial tier, yet when changing the behaviour so that condition barriers may work across tiers it should be simple to add this as an option (Condition barrier working only on initial tier - yes/no). Happy New Year to everyone out there
... View more
01-05-2025
11:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
383
|
|
POST
|
Certainly, I have sent you a mail allowing you to immediately test what works and what apparently seems to not to be working.
... View more
12-16-2024
11:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1015
|
|
POST
|
Creating network categories and assigning these as relevant to asset types representing cables and overhead lines works out - to some extent. For example - I have created a new network category Volue_LV_OHUG and have assigned this to low voltage cables and overhead lines asset types. And setting up a named trace configuration doing a connected traced yet using this network category (Volue_LV_OHUG) as conditional barrier seems to work as intended. the trace stops at low voltage cables and overhead lines. But if I create a named trace configuration (or simply perform a trace) downstream from a medium voltage trace starting point to continue into low voltage (because I want the low voltage part of the substation included in the trace result) yet using the same network category as a conditional barrier the trace still seems to continue into the low voltage grid. What should I look for when debugging?
... View more
12-16-2024
07:57 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1040
|
|
POST
|
Of course, obviously. Should have seen this myself. Despite this, do you see any arguments against adding an idea for allowing grouping as was my initial proposal? Adding categories will work fine in this specific case, yet in may other cases it would seem unflexible.
... View more
12-12-2024
08:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1078
|
|
POST
|
Please elaborate. How may I solve the need through Categories, Mike?
... View more
12-12-2024
06:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1086
|
|
POST
|
Hi there Need to do a connected trace stopping whenever encountering a low voltage cable or a low voltage overhead line. ElectricLine::37::Low Voltage Underground Conductor::102::AC Underground LV ElectricLine::6::Low Voltage Overhead Conductor::100::AC Overhead LV This is done using condition barriers - in SQL I would create a query like (ASSETGROUP = 37 and ASSETTYPE = 102) or (ASSETGROUP = 6 and ASSETTYPE = 100) Using the GP tool I would set it up like this: How do i know that ArcGIS does an (A and B) or (C and D) and not a A and (B or C) and D? It's the first combination / query that I need.
... View more
12-11-2024
06:22 AM
|
0
|
9
|
1118
|
|
POST
|
Volue, a Scandinavia-based Gold partner of Esri, provides Volue Grid Calculator - a SaaS-based access to performing load-flow- and short-circuit-calculations from directly within ArcGIS Pro or web map. https://www.volue.com/products-and-services/volue-grid-calculator Volue Grid Calculator allows calculating on both medium- and low voltage grids. This product is currently implemented for supporting balanced three-phase grids with their extensive low-voltage grids rather than poles for every four houses - as seen in Europe and large shares of the world. That said, grid calculation on 'North American grids' abides to the same rule-set as calculating other grid setups. Adapting / reconfiguring Volue Grid Calculator for your needs is feasible given the right business case. With such grid calculation capabilities offered directly to your GIS users valuable business intelligence is democratized and your calculation experts are offloaded to focus on more complex calculations.
... View more
10-28-2024
08:22 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1019
|
|
POST
|
Let me suggest you also looking into the white paper released and IMGIS 2024 describing in detail how to implement the UN data model to support balanced three phase grids: https://www.volue.com/news/volue-and-elvia-release-white-paper A white paper that has been established based on years of experience data modelling and migrating to utility network for several very mature Scandinavian DSOs.
... View more
10-21-2024
03:45 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1371
|
|
POST
|
Has any bug been reported on this so far? If so, could you tell the bug-ID and hint an expected release date for a patch, please? I likewise have encountered mysterious behavior on the distance traces - using ArcGIS Pro 3.3.1. Having this bug fixed is needed for us to deliver according to contract with a large Danish DSO.
... View more
09-17-2024
11:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2885
|
|
IDEA
|
In an electric grid having a section of the grid de-energized due to open switching devices between it and one or more subnetwork controllers I need Utility Network to offer a trace telling me potential switching devices to close in order to re-energise this section. At Esri UC 2024 I discussed this with David Crawford and he suggested an approach that could bring me some of the way, yet may output false positives. Let me explain. I place a trace starting somewhere in the de-energised section and initiate a Connected trace. This connected trace is configured with Condition Barrier Operating Status Normal equals Open This will make the connected trace stop at open switching devices. and with Output Condition also set to Operating Status Normal equals Open This will make the connected trace only return these open switching devices. And it does return open switching reachable from the trace starting point placed within the de-energised section of the grid. So far so good. Yet, in case of loops within the de-energized section or open switching devices to a customer currently disconnected the trace result will include open breaker not allowing in-feed. False positives. You guys, Esri, have the entire graph model in the background and I assume it's feasible for you guys to offer a trace capability / configuration returning only the open breakers which upon closing would in fact re-energise the section in question without including false positives. Looking forward to your answer and fix. Love how at Esri UC you can go to the expo, find the right booth and always find the knowledgeable person answering your questions ❤️ Best regards Jens Dalsgaard Volue
... View more
07-17-2024
06:09 PM
|
2
|
0
|
475
|
|
POST
|
I know this. All these entities are included in the linked white paper. And we have found solutions to all of these challenges. And it has been tested. And it works. That said, I am aware, that for DSOs having come very far in their modelling work, changing direction may be hard. I'll leave this discussion for now - my comment was simply an input.
... View more
07-02-2024
12:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
858
|
|
POST
|
Correct. The question is: Why have bays represented by structure junctions? Our white paper describes a data model in it's entirety - including substations, bays, etc. It's an input. Tested out and working.
... View more
07-01-2024
06:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
867
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-05-2025 02:34 AM | |
| 2 | 08-19-2025 04:36 AM | |
| 1 | 01-31-2023 08:01 AM | |
| 1 | 10-28-2024 08:22 AM | |
| 2 | 10-21-2024 03:45 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
12-18-2025
12:50 AM
|