Save the dates: 15-17 October 2025 for the annual meetup hosted by Andel in Denmark! If you have not already registered during IMGIS International please express your interest to participate here: https://arcg.is/0y11qC1. More details and an agenda to follow.    ... View more

For more information on the Esri International Infrastructure Management & GIS Conference, visit the website here: https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/international-imgis/overview ... View more

Hi   I have an issue when trying to trace and update a subnetwork.  We get the msg One or more dirty areas were discovered. [[ElectricDevice: {0CD2ED96-5610-4579-80D1-B63F5B8F2EDE}], [ElectricAssembly: {1A89D4D6-F458-4B07-A18A-0CE97C86A1E8}]] This is usually not a problem, we just fix the issue. But this is a bit special since this device and assembly i deleted several months ago. They did live in a short period 6th of November 2024 form 11:31 to 12:05  The dirty area exists but not with an area, just a record. I looks like the deletion is not correctly registered somehow ? I have not found a way to solve this issue, and since this causes a persistent problem with updating this subnetwork it also gives a problem towards operation system etc. Is there anyway to create this back into deafult with its original globalid, tricking the system to find something we can have validated or deleted again ?  Has anyone had a similar problem and managed to fix it ?   br Eivind       ... View more

HI, at Lnett we experience problems if we are deleting a subnetwork (deleting from function "modify control device) and setting a new one on the same same controller, but in different tier. It happens if a user does something wrong, and will fix it. Tis is the steps they do: - Set a subnetwork controller - User discover they have set wrong Tier - Delete the subnetwork (as shown below) -Set the same device as a subnetwork controller in correct tier (same name as the first on both Controller and subnet name) - Trace subnetwork - looks good, traces the correct subnetwork - Save and update subnetwork - works fine, no error - Posting to default and then there are some problems.  - The subnetwork is not created in default, and triggering a an new update will sometimes give a subnetwork but not  100% correct. It will sometimes show as subnetwork towards wrong tier, and from the post log below you can see it "thinks" there are two subnetworks... [VG22F85] successfully updated subnetwork in domain Electric, tier Electric Subtransmission (Finished 7:15:30 AM took 0:00:11.240964) [VG22F85] successfully updated subnetwork in domain Electric, tier Electric Distribution MV (Finished 7:15:32 AM took 0:00:11.241954)   This problem will continue to appear for this subnetwork, if we trigger an update in this subnetwork it will sometimes fail, sometimes work fine.   I was wondering if anyone has seen the same and if they have a good way to fix. (will it help to delete the features ? controller etc?   br Eivind Aasland Lnett AS         ... View more

In the attached compressed file you can find UN22 data model supportive documentation. This is a predecessor of the latest Electric Foundation Solution published by UNC group internal team of developers in 2022. In the package you can find:  UNC Policy, version 22 UNC22 Electric Distribution Model description UNC22 Structure Model description UNC22 DataElements description, beta version UNC22 Readme   ... View more