Latest Contributions by Jens_Dalsgaard

‎03-13-2024

Volue Joining IMGIS International Conference For utilities the IMGIS International Conference in Frankfurt 8-10 April is among the highlights of the year. Here, like-minded individuals gather, and Esri showcases all the splendours and innovations of their platform. It’s a place to find inspiration that can be directly taken back and applied within your own organization to ensure its success. Utility Network of course has caught your interest already as is the case at numerous utilities worldwide. And maybe you have started the journey. IMGIS is the place to be. While Volue may not yet be a household name among utilities beyond Scandinavia, our extensive business knowledge and highly pertinent capabilities are poised to make a significant impact in tackling the challenges outlined in the market. Volue has established itself as the foremost vendor in the well-developed Scandinavian market since the 1980s. Through strategic acquisitions, we have diligently cultivated an extensive knowledge base and a diverse array of capabilities that are highly relevant to the development of future-proof solutions. Come meet us at IMGIS where we will host several presentations together with front-runner electric utilities. Monday 16.15: Integrating Utility Network Grid Calculations in Work Processes and Wednesday 10.15: Jumpstart Your Electric UN Migration – EUNF-whitepaper from N1, Elvia and Volue. Also, come visit us at our booth to hear how Volue may assist you and your organisation in the transition towards a zero-emission future. #Volue #EsriPartner #utilitynetwork #IMGIS2024

‎03-12-2024

Sending Elvia grid data requires their approval (takes time). Could you test based on the asset package TEMPLATE, John? Such does not hold sensitive grid data

‎02-25-2024

I see the ARCFM GDB administrative tools as obsolete as the branch versioning no longer needs constant maintenance Session Mgr - We're developing our own solution for this.

‎02-25-2024

I can do that - explain what we're trying to accomplish. We're implementing the EUNF data model for a balanced three phase grid serving high-, medium, and low voltage tiers. The out of the box tier names from Esri are not optimal for the customer, hence we want to rename the three (out of six) tiers that we will be using (the other three tiers are filtered out using D_Config): As indicated in the screenshot above, we want to rename the Electric Distribution Primary tier to High voltage. Rename works as long as we do not try to rename tiers. When trying to also rename tiers, the above error is thrown.

‎02-13-2024

Agree. The solution is to make a program that analyses the dirty area polygons and their inherent information and that based on this creates 'Error Line' and 'Error Point' features. This will offer much better usability and comprehending of what errors exist where.

‎02-12-2024

For domestic PV production I would recommend maintaining such information in a separate customer / meter management system. And then, having service points and meter connections registered in UN, integrate the information from this third party system into GIS. This master data management approach removes double efforts managing this information in several systems. With such approach you may also benefit from other information from the third-party customer management / MDM system (meter type, consumption, planned replacement of meters, critical customers, ...)

‎01-18-2024

A quick question. I have a schema and a corresponding D_Configuration (XYZ) working as intended. Now I add e.g. an extra attribute (ABC) to one of the feature classes in the asset package template and migrate data thereto. What would happen if after adding this attribute ABC I apply the asset package with the D_Configuration XYZ without updating this D_Configuration with this new attribute ABC? Will attribute ABC be filtered out and not be applied to the utility network, or not? Best regards

‎12-11-2023

Given the fact that the consolidation version for Utility Network is ArcGIS Pro 3.1 could you inform me please on when we may expect a 3.1 patch with this fix.

‎11-21-2023

Nice with a workaround @CashEddy Still the ArcGIS Pro is a primary interface and should be improved on this topic.

‎11-15-2023

Thanks for the feedback. My intentions were backed.

‎11-15-2023

Reading here (https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/an-overview-of-attribute-domains.htm) it appears that the field to which a domain is assigned can be of many data types. So is it shear imagination when I believe I've Esri heard recommend using data type Integer to obtain best possible performance?

‎08-07-2023

Preparing for such 'condensed presentations of what we’re doing related to UN' it would be nice to have an indication of how much time we may expect available for such 🙂 So, once you know please update this post. Best regards Jens Dalsgaard / Volue

‎05-12-2023

Many of the double-feeding scenarios are in nature temporary and hence dealing with the requirements described above in a - let's call it - static way as suggested here doesn't seem right. Following dialogue at IMGIS and internal dialogue I think we're more inclined to creating custom functionality to support business needs here. But, thanks for the input, Mike.

‎05-11-2023

Allow me to refer you to a LinkedIn post that I made earlier: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jensdalsgaard_dso-digitaltwin-gis-activity-7008701841232265216-rfSa?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Scandinavian utilities have what many utilities out there are still working towards: A digital twin of the grid and and an implemented master data management strategy where grid documentation from ArcGIS Utility Network feed the ERP, the ADMS, grid calculations, etc. No duplicates. In the comments to the post I offer my input to a definition of digital twins in context of electric utility. Good luck with your thesis.

‎03-30-2023

During delta migrations we would like to disable editor tracking so that the fields from the source on who created / updated when may be written and persisted in UN. With editor tracking enabled, whatever we write will be immediately overwritten ty logged in user and date/time of write. Does anything prevent disabling editor tracking on a utility network dataset.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Wednesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by Jens_Dalsgaard

Volue Joining IMGIS 2024 International Conference

Re: D_Rename faulty application on given names

Re: ArcGIS Utility Network Session Management

Re: D_rename Tier error

Re: Change the size of the dirty area polygons

Re: Electric Utility Network - Domestic Solar PV System

D_Configuration and schema changes

Re: Inconsistent trace results

Re: Scroll bar on Network Properties in Utility Management Extenstion

Re: Does field type matter performance wise when assigning domains

Does field type matter performance wise when assigning domains

Re: UNC gathering in September

Re: Handling multi-fed subnetworks with differing Subnetwork names

Re: Utility network and Digital Twin

Disable Editor Tracking on a Utility Network

Re: How to use Error Inspector's Zoom To and Pan T...

Re: Electric Radial Partitioned Tier Source– Why A...

Re: Distance trace - how to?

Re: Choosing the right model for your stakeholders...

Re: Migration from Geometric to Utility network re...

European Utility Network Community (UNC)