|
POST
|
To move from a FGDB to a EGDB, I would use Copy and Paste. Can the Asset Package tools achieve the same end result, yes, but you have to export to Asset Package and then reapply to the EGDB That chart just shows the min version of ArcGIS Pro for the UN version. The asset package tools are supported with the current and previous version of ArcGIS Pro.
... View more
12-05-2025
04:30 AM
|
0
|
1
|
749
|
|
POST
|
Did you include the condition barrier to stop at open switches in your trace?
... View more
12-04-2025
12:08 PM
|
1
|
4
|
578
|
|
POST
|
It depends on what you have set to be aggregated into the subnetline. Check you subnetwork definition and review the aggregated lines.
... View more
12-04-2025
11:07 AM
|
1
|
0
|
800
|
|
POST
|
We do offer some tools that might help you export the subtype based UN layers. Would any of these help you? https://esri.github.io/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools/docs/3.5/ExportReportingData.html This exports the UN to a GDB. It can create a services a views(by subtype, association, etc) to aid with visualation and analsysis. https://esri.github.io/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools/docs/3.5/SubtypesToClasses.html This creates a class for each subtype.
... View more
12-01-2025
06:13 AM
|
0
|
1
|
185
|
|
POST
|
I would advise against calling First and then looping over the featureset. That could cause you to miss the first feature. Try this // Attribute Rule for Deleting Split objects
// Arcade Version 1.29
// Rule Version: 1.0.1 Separated Merge and Split Scripts
// 11/26/2025
// RUN PARAMETERS
// Triggers : Update
// Trigger Fields : Shape
// Exclude From application evaluation: True
var splitLayerName = 'RCL_SPLIT';
var rclSplit = FeatureSetByName($datastore, '<RCL_SPLIT_GUID>',['*'], false);
var deleteArray = [];
for (var feat in rclSplit){
Push(deleteArray,{
'globalID': feat.globalID
});
}
if (IsEmpty(deleteArray)){
return;
}
Console('Split: Deleting ' + Count(deleteArray) + ' Features: ' + deleteArray);
var result = {
'edit': [{
'className': splitLayerName,
'deletes': deleteArray
}]
};
Console(result);
return result;
... View more
12-01-2025
06:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
331
|
|
POST
|
The asset package does convert the GlobalID field to a Guid and disable editor tracking. You might want to delete the GlobalID field(type GUID) and re-add it. Also enable editor tracking.
... View more
11-19-2025
04:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
573
|
|
POST
|
Marco, I can repo it on my dataset too. Definitely seems like a bug. I would log it.
... View more
11-18-2025
04:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
292
|
|
POST
|
Attribute Rules can only access tables in their own database. But there is a trick - https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/creating-attribute-rules-to-access-feature-classes-in-a-000032146
... View more
11-18-2025
04:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
352
|
|
POST
|
Can you recreate the rule using the new templated AR and see if that changes anything?
... View more
11-17-2025
01:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
351
|
|
POST
|
Are all the layers in the same service? Are you deleting the point on the insert? If so, that could cause issues. I ran into similar things in the Abandon Features rule. Deleting $feature in an update/insert call does some bad things. I ended up using a Batch Calc Rule that would find all features marked for deleting and deleting them at a later time.
... View more
11-17-2025
12:24 PM
|
0
|
2
|
426
|
|
POST
|
Take a look at the templated rule - Generate ID. It has a option "Sequence by lookup" that could use an unique seq for grid. The templated rule writes the arcade, which you could modify to also get an ID field from the intersected layer. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/generate-id-attribute-rule.htm#LI_A9FBB4CFF1C5407D9F9A092ABDF2FC3A
... View more
11-17-2025
05:20 AM
|
0
|
2
|
391
|
|
POST
|
Phase Change or the Network Attribute configured for phase propagation should only ever be set at locations where phase changes or deviates. This allows the system to calculate the downstream phase without the editor have to make downstream edits.
... View more
11-16-2025
06:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
238
|
|
POST
|
BTW, if you want that valve in the results, you can use a Find Connected Trace instead of the Isolation Trace.
... View more
11-14-2025
07:58 AM
|
1
|
1
|
530
|
|
POST
|
Ok, that picture helps. That valve is isolated by closing the other valves. So to isolate that area, that valve going into the cul-de-sac does not need to be closed. Now field operations, might choose to close that value, so the pipe is not drained and then does not have to be disinfected. But that valve is not required to be closed to isolate the area.
... View more
11-14-2025
07:56 AM
|
2
|
0
|
533
|
|
POST
|
What do the results look like if you return all isolated features?
... View more
11-14-2025
07:17 AM
|
0
|
3
|
575
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 3 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | a month ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|