Latest Contributions by MikeMillerGIS

Do you have a featureclass that is the same name as your FeatureDataset?  Any way you can package this up and send it to me?   ... View more

The only "issue" I am aware of with a Feeder feed Feeder or adjacent subnetworks in the same tier is the inability to trace upstream through them without selecting a higher(lower number) tier as the target tier.  There is a backlog item for this and if this is what you are experiencing, please log a support incident and tied to the backlog item.  The more request, the higher it moves in the queue. ... View more

I just tried Change AP spatial reference on they AP you sent and it works fine.  Tried 3.7.0, then installed 3.7.1 and both work.   ... View more

I wonder if it is the python environment then.  Are you using a python clone?  Maybe try a new clone? ... View more

That means something is corrupt with that asset package.  Any chance you can zip it up and send it to me.  Want to see what is going on.   ... View more

I also see you have an active map, we have seen where this causes the corruption.  If you delete the map and restart pro or use a new pro session, does it complete? ... View more

We typically see that when a database is corrupt.  What are the inputs(source data and asset package), where are they located.  I see you are using a network share for your atbx,  If you try to apply the asset package before running the tool, are there any errors? ... View more

The trace returns a selection set to ArcGIS Pro.  For order, you will either need to output a JSON file and create a process to walk that or explore a Network Diagram.   ... View more

What settings did you us in the Trace?  Did you set a target tier?   ... View more

A couple things.....if the rules were intentionally removed, why are there four remaining rules including MV Underground Three Phase to Cable Aerial Bare, when single phase for example, no longer exists?  - I am not sure, looks to be mistake and they should have been removed with the others Are you able to provide more detailed documentation on the Conductor Details change and intention, including the new capabilities of Export Subnetwork,  - https://doc.esri.com/en/arcgis-pro/latest/tool-reference/utility-networks/export-subnetwork.html?tabs=dialog  - Look for Related Record Fields do I need to re-assess how I am migrating data, - That is up to you.  We left the existing Edge and Junction objects as moving to related objects is not a 1:1 in functionality.  Such as related objects will not get subnetwork name.  If you have a process that works, do not change for a model update. Should these records instead be migrated to ConductorDetails without associations? - There are advantages as we are reducing the number of records and associations in the UN which can improve performance.  But there are trade offs.   ... View more

You can't or should not rename the Unknown Asset Groups Unknown Asset Type ... View more

In the 4.0 (Jul 2025) release, we moved contained objects for Conductor details to a related table to leverage the new capabilities of Export Subnetwork.  We removed the rules to the EO and JO as part of this.  You can leverage the Summarize Utility Network tool in the Utility Data Management Support tools to generate the rules you would need to add back. ... View more