|
POST
|
A couple things.....if the rules were intentionally removed, why are there four remaining rules including MV Underground Three Phase to Cable Aerial Bare, when single phase for example, no longer exists? - I am not sure, looks to be mistake and they should have been removed with the others Are you able to provide more detailed documentation on the Conductor Details change and intention, including the new capabilities of Export Subnetwork, - https://doc.esri.com/en/arcgis-pro/latest/tool-reference/utility-networks/export-subnetwork.html?tabs=dialog - Look for Related Record Fields do I need to re-assess how I am migrating data, - That is up to you. We left the existing Edge and Junction objects as moving to related objects is not a 1:1 in functionality. Such as related objects will not get subnetwork name. If you have a process that works, do not change for a model update. Should these records instead be migrated to ConductorDetails without associations? - There are advantages as we are reducing the number of records and associations in the UN which can improve performance. But there are trade offs.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
172
|
|
POST
|
You can't or should not rename the Unknown Asset Groups Unknown Asset Type
... View more
a month ago
|
2
|
0
|
197
|
|
POST
|
In the 4.0 (Jul 2025) release, we moved contained objects for Conductor details to a related table to leverage the new capabilities of Export Subnetwork. We removed the rules to the EO and JO as part of this. You can leverage the Summarize Utility Network tool in the Utility Data Management Support tools to generate the rules you would need to add back.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
190
|
|
POST
|
There is no easy way to re-assigned an entire Asset Type domain.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
213
|
|
POST
|
Can you share the difference. Which EO are no longer supported in the containment relationship?
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
208
|
|
POST
|
That is correct, you cannot change the domain with these tables. For that, you will just change the domain assignment in the subtypes view in of that class in the asset package.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
240
|
|
POST
|
Without a sample dataset or more information, I cannot provide any additional assistance. There are lot of variables.
... View more
06-30-2026
04:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
278
|
|
POST
|
Subnetworks use controllers to determine directionality. If you are using the check box to use digitize direction, then the up/downstream can produce different results since it is using the digitized direction of the line versus the controller.
... View more
06-30-2026
04:31 AM
|
0
|
1
|
420
|
|
POST
|
What condition barriers do you have defined on your tier? Compare these to what is set on the line. Did you add propagation to your water network? Can you share a sample dataset?
... View more
06-30-2026
03:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
284
|
|
POST
|
There was a change on an underlying library, which causes empty expressions to fail. You will need to add an expression like 1=1 for now. We are planning to get a fix into a 3.7 patch.
... View more
06-29-2026
04:29 PM
|
0
|
1
|
251
|
|
POST
|
Yes it does, just checking. Any chance you have a duplicate Global ID? If you search the device class for that feature, by GlobalID, is there more than one? Search the line/junction,junction object, etc for that global id too.
... View more
06-26-2026
09:15 AM
|
1
|
1
|
433
|
|
POST
|
Can you ensure that it is also present in the parent tiers definitions?
... View more
06-26-2026
08:48 AM
|
0
|
1
|
450
|
|
POST
|
The tiers do not seem correct. It sounds like trunkline and gathering are piers, so they should both be rank 2 or merged into a single tier and use subnetworks to separate them.
... View more
06-25-2026
05:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
439
|
|
POST
|
Ok, we did not track down exactly when that change to append occurred, but it was in 3.6. We did not make the changes in Data Loading at 3.6 to auto turn off Preserve, but we did in 3.7. Glad support figured it out. You should be fine just setting to to False.
... View more
06-24-2026
01:51 PM
|
0
|
3
|
303
|
|
POST
|
Oh that's right. There was a change to append that if target did not have a real global ID field and Preserve Global ID is set to true, it raises that error, as it is looking for the global ID field. At 3.7, we auto switch it to false when the target does not have a Global ID. What version of ArcGIS Pro are you using?
... View more
06-24-2026
01:39 PM
|
0
|
5
|
691
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | a month ago | |
| 1 | 06-26-2026 09:15 AM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2026 05:01 AM | |
| 1 | 06-02-2026 01:29 PM | |
| 2 | 05-27-2026 08:28 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
11 hours ago
|