Latest Contributions by MikeMillerGIS

Phase Change or the Network Attribute configured for phase propagation should only ever be set at locations where phase changes or deviates.  This allows the system to calculate the downstream phase without the editor have to make downstream edits.   ... View more

BTW, if you want that valve in the results, you can use a Find Connected Trace instead of the Isolation Trace. ... View more

Ok, that picture helps.  That valve is isolated by closing the other valves.  So to isolate that area, that valve going into the cul-de-sac does not need to be closed.  Now field operations, might choose to close that value, so the pipe is not drained and then does not have to be disinfected.  But that valve is not required to be closed to isolate the area. ... View more

What do the results look like if you return all isolated features? ... View more

Hmm.  Well it could be two things A: Using Phases Normal instead of Phase Change could be setting the phases energize.  I do not think it is this though.  That should only be set if the propagator can reach the asset, which it appears it cannot since the subnetwork trace stops B: Since the value was set and now the propagator cannot reach it, it does not know it has to reset it.   ... View more

If you do a subnetwork trace, does it select that downstream line?  If you place a barrier pass that line?  We need to find if there is a loop somewhere. ... View more

What is the other unit?  Do both units have a phase change set?  If the other unit does not and not open, that is allowing the phase to push through.   ... View more

are you modeling units in that switch?  Are the units open? ... View more

That device is the barrier, so one side is techincally energized, so it gets the phases energized field.  Even if you turn off "Include Barriers" in the subnetwork definition, since it has a multi terminal configuration, it will still get the energized value.  The features downstream are reporting De-Energized, correct?   ... View more

I would need the source and target database in a fgdb.  Do not need the Geometric network.  Also the data mapping spreadsheet. ... View more

If you can package up a repo case(schema only), I can look a look.  Reviewing the source, it has something to do with the source to target mapping and subtypes.  It should be looking at the subtype name.  Do you have subtypes who description is a number? ... View more

You should focus on subtypes, removing them, will remove the asset types(domain codes) and all related UN properties.  So set all items in the subtype section that you do not want to Always Remove ... View more

With a config table, it applies a sql query to exclude asset groups and types that are no longer valid in the target.  If you run that query against your asset package(select by attribute), do you get any records? Also, you will see much faster times running locally.  Running with source and result on a network share drastically slows down performance.   ... View more