Latest Contributions by BenVan_Kesteren1

Hey,  So I have an email field in a Survey123 form created on the Survey123 Website, and when a user enters an invalid email address like 'ben@ben' or 'ben.ben.com' the form doesn't allow this value, and prompts the user to reconsider (which is great!).  What I have found is that users are entering emoji as part of their email, and this is having knock on effects further down my workflow (in FME etc), and I think the problem is with the form allowing emoji in the first place. As far as I am aware emoji are not supported in email addresses. Valid email according to Survey123 form: Invalid email identified by Survey123 form (which I am happy with!): I think the email field should not accept these emoji characters as part of an email address. Thanks ... View more

I am viewing the sample/template titled 'Grid Style Groups', and it has this as the example data, see highlighted pink: type name label begin group group_1a Page 2 (Grid Groups - No Repeats) image photo Site Photo begin group group_1b   text site_name Site Name text site_id Site ID text job_number Job Number integer air_temp Air Temp (°C) select_one cloud cloud Cloud Cover select_one wind_speed wind_speed Wind Speed I try to publish this survey and the whole document is throwing errors, I think the rules have changed, but the document may not have been updated? My actual issue, if anyone has any ideas on how to resolve, is how can I hide the bold group names as shown below?  I dont need to waste the space with the words Inspection and Sub Group. I would love for these labels to not exist at all. I only have them so I can format the works required and (works urgency & botanical name) in two columns as shown below, if this can be done via another method other than groups, i would love to know: type name label begin group group_a Inspection select_multiple works_reqd works_required Works Required begin group inspect_b Sub Group select_one urgency urgency Works Urgency select_one botanical botanical_name Botanical Name end group     text notes Notes end group     ... View more

When viewing the schema preview tab in Connect the field names are not able to be viewed if they are over a certain number of characters. I have tried to minimise the Table list at the left, but this does not help. There is no way to click and drag the column width so I can adjust visibility. Please add this ability.  Recording of issue uploaded here: Imgur  ... View more

I have created surveys where 100% of the users will be conducting data collection via the Inbox only, they will never be required to capture new data using the collect button.  I would love to be able to disable the collect button from being an option on these specific surveys, the less buttons made available, the less likely users can do the wrong thing. I love that we do not see the 'inbox' button when the inbox is not enabled, this is essentially the same request, but for the collect button. Thanks for your consideration! ... View more

I have a survey that has been created to work entirely with INBOX data (so updating a pre populated table, using a survey123 form). When I look at my overview page, it only talks about me being the user. When there is in fact several users submitting data, but because it is through the INBOX and not the COLLECT button, I believe the information is being filtered off in this Overview page.. Could you please consider adding an editor section here?  Also it says 'Total participants 1', but there are several people editing via INBOX. ... View more

I have a cemetery project where I have two tables, one is a polygon feature class representing grave locations, and the other is a basic table, with occupant information. There can be Many people, within a single grave, so it is 1:M (grave to burial). The raw data in my Enterprise GDB has a relate setup on the above, and has been published to AGOL, and it looks good online. A view of the original data from the GDB - Imgur  I can select a grave online, and it shows the MANY rows within that one grave: Now what I am hoping to do is create a survey based on this feature layer, and I imagine that it will have a few base questions based on the grave polygon, and then a repeat, showing each of the people buried within, with the capability to add extra people to those graves, using the repeat. I thought if I used Survey123 Connect to create a new survey, based on an existing feature, that it would automatically setup the repeat based on the related table, but as you can see in the attachment, it doesn't do that at all. Every row in the above automatically created spreadsheet is from the original cemetery_graves table, it has no reference to the related burials table in the survey at all. Can someone tell me if they have been able to create a survey based on existing tables with a related table? Is what I am looking to do even possible? I have been able to create surveys with repeats, from scratch, but this is the first time I have existing data, that I want to incorporate in my survey. Ismael Chivite‌ I am wondering if this is something you have dealt with or come across in the past? A survey on a feature class, that has a related table... Cheers ... View more