|
POST
|
Hi Justin, I know this is an old question, but I wonder if you remember how you fixed it? I'm having the same problem: just trying to edit an attribute value in a non-read-only field in an editable feature class that was created in the default file geodatabase for my new project. I am able to select the field value I want from the pull down in the edit attribute window (the symbology is based on this field), but once I try to commit the edit I get the super-helpful error message: "! Edit operation failed". No help link. No explanation. *Edit: it does not matter which field I try to edit, I get the same message. This feature class was created as the output of geocoding an Excel table, if it matters. No joins or relates. I'm on Pro 2.5, using a Standard License, on a Windows 7 VDI (VMware) machine. I've restarted. My project, and thus the FGDB and feature class, are located on our company network drive. I have been able to edit other field values in Pro before.
... View more
04-16-2020
12:09 PM
|
0
|
2
|
5226
|
|
POST
|
To clarify what Jake is saying for anyone else who finds themselves here: ArcGIS Online accounts assigned the 'Data Editor' role cannot export layers, because they cannot create new items. Administrators must upgrade users to the 'Publisher' role in order for them to be able to see the Export Files button. * And, yes, this is not intuitive, since the Data Editor role is listed below Administrator and above Publisher in the Roles drop down. Upon closer inspection, this appears to be an alphabetical ordering, and not the hierarchy it implies.
... View more
04-15-2020
01:44 PM
|
5
|
1
|
8697
|
|
POST
|
If I'm interpreting this correctly, the "Media Folder" would be defining a root location on a server within which all CCTV videos are located, and the use of the "Video Location" field would allow separate CCTV inspection projects to be loaded to the this root location within sub-folders? If this is the case, then I agree with Jose - define the path using both. I think this would provide the most flexibility to keep the various video projects organized over time on the server. But I'm curious to see what some other experienced CCTV project manager may prefer. For instance, would this make sharing or exporting the feature class with embedded links to the video more difficult on other platforms or web applications (since the full path would not be included in the Video Location field)?
... View more
04-14-2020
09:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2844
|
|
POST
|
FYI: This is now an official bug - #BUG-000129778 Make Query Table tool does not allow clause mode editing of SQL expression parameter.
... View more
04-01-2020
08:35 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4656
|
|
POST
|
Updates: #BUG-000129778 Make Query Table tool does not allow clause mode editing of SQL expression parameter and #BUG-000129607 Add join does not correctly honor definition query on join table
... View more
04-01-2020
08:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3042
|
|
POST
|
Bueller? ... Anybody? Should I add this to the "Ideas" forum?
... View more
03-31-2020
08:34 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1761
|
|
POST
|
I have designed a Task the generates a lot of new data. I'm now running through the final Task steps as a QC test before I release it to my co-workers, making small changes and tweaks to the steps along the way when I see something that could be improved. How can I just pick up running the Task from where I left off after opening Task Designer to update a step? I don't want to start over at the first step of the Task and regenerate a bunch of data that has already been created.
... View more
03-27-2020
04:26 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1833
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Shana. I’ve decided NOT to change the default. Instead, I’ll educate our users on where to find this setting when appropriate. Joe Bryant GIS Coordinator WEST YOST ASSOCIATES direct 530.761.0226 Cell: 916-833-5840
... View more
03-25-2020
02:03 PM
|
1
|
0
|
4337
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for clarifying, Joshua. I did some tests and found that both "date" and "timestamp" run successfully in the Make Query Table tool. However, only the word "timestamp" auto-completes in blue in the SQL query dialog box; "date" does not. I'm not sure why, but it must have some indication of what's going on behind the scenes in the software. Dragging the tool history into Model Builder also runs fine inside Model Builder, with no warnings, in Clause and SQL query modes. However, when I save the model and open it as a GP Tool, I get an error saying "Internal Error initializing expression." If I try to switch from SQL to Clause mode, I get a warning that "the source layer or table is not valid". This is with the input layer hard-coded into the tool, not set as a parameter. This definitely backs up your assertion that this is a combination Model Builder / Make Query Table error, and has nothing to do with the data type keyword.
... View more
03-24-2020
04:55 PM
|
0
|
1
|
4656
|
|
POST
|
I had been trying to figure out why a SQL Query expression was giving me a syntax error using Model Builder in ArcGIS Pro. I had been constructing the query as instructed here: SQL reference for query expressions used in ArcGIS—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation, which says that you should use the word "date" before the string containing your date value in the expression. Example from that page: INCIDENT_DATE >= date '2011-01-01 00:00:00' However, this was giving me a syntax error when using the Make Query Table tool in ModelBuilder. (*Note: I was not able to edit the expression in Clause mode, which may be a bug related to the Make Query Tool described here). It wasn't until I created the expression in the GP Pane that I saw that Pro was constructing the query as: Sampling_Date = timestamp '2020-02-10 00:00:00' As mentioned, this is using data from a table in file geodatabase, from a field of type date. When do I use "date", and when do I use "timestamp"? Is it the difference between a date field in a FGDB feature class and an FGDB table?
... View more
03-20-2020
03:39 PM
|
0
|
3
|
4782
|
|
POST
|
Hi Ulf, I'm also having problems using the Make Query Table tool in Pro's Model Builder. I did not import this model from Arc, but am building it from scratch. Basically, I want to be able to make the query a parameter of the tool, so users can select a certain date subset of data to use. The tool will run fine the first time in Model Builder, but after saving I can no longer change the expression using a parameter variable. I get the the "can't be edited in Clause mode" warning you mentioned, as well as an error about the expression not being able to be initialized. It looks like this is because the Clause is populated be the input data set choices, and the Model doesn't have access to this information until the process starts running, so there is no way to construct the parameter beforehand. I'm researching it further and trying different methods. Frustratingly, the only reason I'm using this tool is because the Add Join tool does not honor the layer properties definition query on tables the way it did in ArcMap, so I have to use Make Query Table first. I currently have a case with ESRI Support to get this other bug documented (and maybe fixed?). I'll let you know what I find, but wanted to 'bump' this thread in case others are also struggling with this tool.
... View more
03-20-2020
09:50 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3042
|
|
POST
|
Hi Shana, I'm considering pushing out "Method 2: Permanently set the 'Match with no zones' default setting to Yes/True" to my entire organization's address locator install files. We contract with lots of utilities in the US, and the address data we are supplied often does not have zip codes. It looks like you never found your old forum post. Could you briefly explain we we wouldn't want to set the default to 'true'? There must be a compelling reason, since ESRI did not change this setting after it introduced problems way back in 10.1.
... View more
03-20-2020
08:53 AM
|
1
|
3
|
4339
|
|
POST
|
Thanks James! That absolutely worked! It was also a lot more difficult than I expected. I'll have to save that function as I doubt I could write it from scratch.
... View more
03-10-2020
03:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6401
|
|
POST
|
Hi, I have a string field that contains both a test number and a Hydrant Test ID (alpha character) that I'm attempting to split into two separately returned values for a Survey123 URL Parameter. I'm currently using the Custom Attribute Display in the Pop-Up for the feature instead of calculating a new field (the feature layer is joined to a hosted table, so I can't create and calculate a new field). The field values are formatted like this: 1, 1A, 1B, 2, 2A,......14, 14A, etc. I'm trying to return both the Test Number (1, 2, 14) and the Hydrant ID (A, B, C, D, else "Flowing") separately. Returning the ID I have figured out : var HydrantID = Right($feature["WY_TestNum"], 1) IIF($feature["WY_Status"]=="Flowing", "Flowing", HydrantID) I thought I had the Test Number figured out using the Number function: Number($feature.WY_TestNum) But this only works for the strings that only contain a number. Values like '1A' don't return anything ('NaN'). Is there a way to use the pattern parameter to return just the number values, even though my data pattern is not index-able from left to right?
... View more
03-10-2020
02:46 PM
|
1
|
2
|
6587
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing this "hack", Brian. I imagine that as Gregg points out below, this re-indexes the Global ID field for the layer with attachments enabled. But unlike Gregg, we don't have access to the RDBMS behind the scenes in an ArcGIS Online hosted feature service. FYI: Your method worked for me only after I disabled/enabled attachments for every layer in the feature service. I also attempted to update the service definition by editing the JSON at the rest/admin/service endpoint (accessed by inserting "/admin" between "/rest" and "/service" in the service URL). Just changing "supportsApplyEditsWithGlobalIds" : to "true" did not stick. Re-indexing the Global ID fields seems to be required. I'm not sure if there is method to do this using the API other than the disable/enable workflow you found. Maybe someone else with more developer skills can enlighten us. This would be the preferable method so that we don't lose any current attachments in the re-indexing process.
... View more
01-29-2020
01:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
21439
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03-12-2026 02:09 PM | |
| 1 | 03-21-2025 03:07 PM | |
| 1 | 12-04-2025 04:57 PM | |
| 1 | 10-23-2025 04:54 PM | |
| 9 | 10-01-2025 12:20 PM |