Latest Contributions by JTessier

Chiming in to echo prior commenters, this seems like a bad oversight on Esri's part to offer Enterprise software which Survey123 is advertised as being without it supporting multiuser workflows natively.   In addition, by requiring it to install the core software itself into a user's directory means difficulty if not impossibility for offering it via virtualized machines on secure networks.  ... View more

Hi @Shen_Zhang I work with the OP, not sure what you mean by user types needing to be taken into account?  Would think this would be an Admin only configuration for a Portal-wide removal/non-display of social media sharing links in ANY interface, starting with the Share widget (most obvious there).    ... View more

Agree with @dbKlingdom  above. ... View more

Thanks Shaun, will do, we are just in process of upgrading Pro to 3.3 and noticing that our python scripts silently stopped working and determined the python clones were not upgraded along with the default clone.  More to come, but hoping the next upgrade goes smoother. ... View more

@ShaunWalbridge is this a bug you are tracking?  If so what product version do you see it for?  We struggle mightily with the python clones  everytime we upgrade Pro. Thanks! ... View more

Saw this in AI response, perhaps something to check: "If ArcGIS Experience Builder is not loading the layers list when adding a web map with multiple layers, the issue could be related to a layer added by URL that uses uppercase letters for "arcgis". Esri is reviewing the issue and may contact the user for more information. " ... View more

Hi @NanaDei I believe the original poster @Bud of the other suggested (and I agree) in his original post that custom attribute rules are not the preferred solution.  If we had to enforce domains with a custom attribute rule for each table in our 400+ layer data model, that would likely be unwieldy/unmanageable. When as both ideas state:  "I’m aware similar functionality can be achieved via customization using attribute rules or database triggers. But we shouldn't need to write custom code to enforce a pick list. Most enterprise systems have hard domains built in as a way of enforcing basic data integrity. For example, in IBM Maximo, the entire system honors domains by default — including back-end Python scripts. As a result, data integrity is rock solid, making data analysis easy."   Do you see another mechanism Esri can pursue to force domain values be respected as one would expect, as requested by this poster as well? ... View more

Also seeing this related post about probably the same issue: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/prevent-non-domain-values-from-being-used-across/idi-p/1185679 ... View more

This should not happen right @jill_es @NanaDei ?  We have the same issue where domain values are set, but data editors can calculate values that do not match the values.  Is there a way to really prevent this?  We are using PostgreSQl in Azure as our SDE database. ... View more

@MarianneFarretta  Which version of Enterprise will this be implemented in? ... View more

@ChristopherPawlyszyn We hit the same issue with 11.1, is there a new version we can get for 11.1 or can we pull it from an 11.2 install? ... View more

We are doing the same thing as @RhettZufelt , and get some interesting issues, have lots of retries built in to get it to work.  Will ping colleagues to post some help as we figure things out. ... View more

And interested in a roadmap for more seemless options in the future for ArcGIS Enterprise @jill_es . ... View more

Would be interested in a meetup with @JSchroeder to discuss how best to bridge the gap (syncing options) between referenced layers in eGDB  and hosted layers in ArcGIS Enterprise that many apps like Survey 123 work with.  ... View more