Latest Contributions by JTessier

Hi @ClaytonCrawford , our Federal customers would also like to see direct support for LAZ files in Pro.  So thank you for following this one.  Question: your response seems to include a nuance I don't know if I'm interpreting correctly.  It suggests that an LAS file will need to be available separate from the LAZ (compressed version of the LAS).  Whereas, by "direc support" I believe the Original Poster and our customers would like Pro to read and work with LAZ files directly (handle the decompression under the hood for the portions being utilized is what I would think would happen).  Is that what is/will be available in Pro 3.6?  Thanks for your attention to this matter. ... View more

Do you also store the overviews in the Blob Storage? ... View more

Did this approach work out for you? ... View more

@ThomasEdghill are you creating these for each version of AGE?  Really like these, think they should be in the Plenary! ... View more

Is #8 on this list the implementation of this idea?   https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-ideas-blog/your-ideas-in-arcgis-pro-3-5/bc-p/1621263#M77 ... View more

Can you point us to the ideas for ArcGIS Enterprise that @https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/159799 was adding.  I can only find ArcGIS Enterprise 10.9.1 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-ideas-blog/your-ideas-in-arcgis-enterprise-10-9/ba-p/1072018 as the last one, but would like to have seen this continue for the 11.x and the future releases. ... View more

link broken 😞  Hoping this is now possible? ... View more

You are reporting this is now available in ArcGIS Online; when will it be available in ArcGIS Enterprise?  Ideally the order returned would be configurable within the webmap.  As layers at the top of the layer list my not be the priority for popup display.  But the solution you describe is still likely better than the fastest service wins. 😉 ... View more

@ThomasEdghill , @Russell_J can we weigh in on this needed enhancement?  Thx! ... View more

@BradKiep did you ever find a solution to this?  We are also experiencing this same behavior at 11.1 and now 11.3.  Thx! ... View more

Thanks @DavidPike , yeah your last question mark is the nut of the portal webhook issue: it would be great if they would either fail gracefully and not just deactivate.  Again need documentation that talks about if they will try to self heal and try again later if they go inactive (or enhancement that allows for this AND for them to be purposely (manually) set to inactive), how many attempts are made and non-200s are accepted before they go inactive, and where they are stored (assuming portal webhooks are in the portal pgsql dbs) but not sure about the others.  ... View more

Would love to get some administrative doc describing the inner workings of Portal and ALL other webhooks as we have seen our portal webhooks go inactive, but cant tell why, and now we have a third party tool check if they have gone inactive and reactivate them. We are also seeing logs in the ArcGIS Datastore for webhooks schema problems, and hoping esri support can provide insight on those, so you may check there, but we dont know what those webhooks are related to as they dont seem to be the portal ones.  I know arcgis server has webhooks possible, but wondering what others are under the hood and where they live.  ... View more

This could impact thousands of users in our environment if not detected quickly.  Unlcear if ArcGIS Monitor has it, but it is critical enough to warrant in any Enterprise. ... View more

Chiming in to echo prior commenters, this seems like a bad oversight on Esri's part to offer Enterprise software which Survey123 is advertised as being without it supporting multiuser workflows natively.   In addition, by requiring it to install the core software itself into a user's directory means difficulty if not impossibility for offering it via virtualized machines on secure networks.  ... View more