IDEA
|
In ArcGIS Online, I've been in the process of adding bulk users to a new organization, but it's been a bit frustrating trying to cross check at-a-glance who has accepted invitations and who hasn't with a list maintained in a spreadsheet (from another organization). I then discovered, that if I log in with a non-Administrator account, there is this handy little window showing the newest members to join! IDEA: Add the same window to the Administrator view of the Organization page, or add a "joined date" option to the sorting list on the Members page.
... View more
a month ago
|
2
|
4
|
222
|
IDEA
|
@RTPL_AU Nice to know! Hopefully we can get around to testing and rolling out 3.3 before Christmas! (won't hold my breath). I was pleasantly surprised when that copy was successful in around 5 minutes or so!
... View more
08-27-2024
12:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
324
|
IDEA
|
Cancelling GP tools midway through - nope, gotta think about that first. Or like right now for me - "You're trying to copy 167,000 records? No worries - come back tomorrow please" 🙃🌴
... View more
08-26-2024
11:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
338
|
IDEA
|
Great question - I didn't know the details myself, but this article has explained it well. KMZ vs KML: What's the Difference? - GIS Geography
... View more
08-22-2024
05:25 PM
|
0
|
0
|
112
|
IDEA
|
Currently, based on the testing I've done, when converting a Map to a KMZ to load onto a Garmin device, it doesn't work. I believe this to be due to the different image formats in use by the different platforms. If I'm not mistaken, ArcGIS Pro outputs PNG image types in the KML/KMZ files produced by running the "Map to KML" tool. However, from my reading online, Garmins required a JPEG format in KMZ files loaded in as a Custom Basemap. IDEA: Allow the option to choose what image format is used in the output file to make the product suitable for Garmins (or, a setting box that configures the output for use in commonly used devices e.g. "Garmin", "Google Earth", etc)
... View more
08-21-2024
08:24 PM
|
2
|
2
|
172
|
BLOG
|
So, based on this, I would assume that when publishing a new feature service from ArcGIS Pro, the more complex symbology would also be honoured and then tweakable in ArcGIS Online. As for modifying existing feature service symbology, without having to resort to a republish of the layer from ArcGIS Pro, you would need to go through the process above and then Save the feature service in the map (or "Save as" as a new layer) to be able to add it to other maps.
... View more
08-15-2024
06:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
272
|
POST
|
Could it have something to with the geodatabase name and extension being referenced twice in the folder/file path (maybe it's in a folder named the same as the geodatabase and includes the ".gdb" as well)? FAM_CHITARAQUE_2024.gdb\FAM_CHITARAQUE_2024.gdb I do know that ESRI don't "support" cloud storage (e.g. OneDrive) for data storage due to potential conflicts when being accessed by multiple users, but doesn't mean it doesn't work (as you can see).
... View more
08-14-2024
08:48 PM
|
0
|
0
|
125
|
BLOG
|
Nice work around. To clarify, Steps 2 & 3 would be the same as opening ArcGIS Pro then opening the webmap from your Catalog's Portal connection (which is how our staff typically find data from ArcGIS Online). Being able to modify a webmap this way though is a new concept for me and something I'm keen to try when the situation undoubtably arises!
... View more
08-14-2024
08:39 PM
|
1
|
0
|
348
|
POST
|
Manually, it would be a case of doing the dissolve process, but before appending in the rest of the unaffected lots, you would select by attribute lots that exceed your threshold and delete them, then append in all the orginal lots that don't overlap a new merged lot (select by location).
... View more
08-14-2024
05:26 PM
|
0
|
0
|
171
|
POST
|
Hmmmm....this sounds like moving into model builder or python space. I'm not sure how you would go about splitting merged lots out again as you normally need a feature to split by which you wouldn't have. Using Model Builder, you could iterate through each dissolved lot (held in a temporary dataset) and determine if the new merged area is too large or not. Then based on the outcome either the original lots or the temporary merged lot would be appended to an output dataset. Would be a few steps to make all that happen, but thats what comes to mind if I was attempting to do it.
... View more
08-14-2024
05:25 PM
|
0
|
1
|
171
|
BLOG
|
This has been an enlightening (and concerning) bit of reading!
... View more
08-13-2024
10:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
695
|
POST
|
That was an enlightening (and also concerning) read! Time to reach out to our Esri Liaison I reckon!
... View more
08-13-2024
10:27 PM
|
1
|
2
|
407
|
POST
|
Always ask the question - we've had a few scenarios where things were "not possible" that later have seemed to indeed be possible (with some wrangling).
... View more
08-13-2024
10:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
357
|
POST
|
So we've just finished migrating from one ArcGIS Online org to another (US to APAC hosting) and with it our licenses have changed a fair bit to try and make use of effiencies. We are Mobile Worker heavy with a few Creators and Contributors thrown in for good measure. All bar 1 of our Creator licenses are actually from having Single Use and Concurrent Desktop ArcGIS Pro licenses. We've heard rumours that the Concurrent licenses may be phased out in future licenses model updates. I'm wondering if anyone can comment on what the future holds in this regard. Are they likely to disappear? WOuld they be replaced 1 for 1 solely by Creators (which would be interesting given the makeup of Single Use, Primary Concurrent and Secondary Concurrent licenses and their differing prices). Because of the June changes to the User Types and Roles, we now have 9 Creator licenses in ArcGIS Online that we can't assign to anyone because we have no compatible user types. Thinking we'll have to convert them back to Single Use licenses if we want to use them. Additionally, we have Network Analyst and Spatial Analyst extensions that can only be accessed by Concurrent licenses. Would these be swapped to Add-On's that can be used by anyone (like in Concurrent mode) or must they be assigned to particular users?
... View more
08-13-2024
07:23 PM
|
0
|
4
|
445
|
POST
|
I assume you have a value in mind for what deems a lot as undersized? I would do it one of 2 ways: 1. Add a field and calculate a value based on that lot area. Each Lot gets assigned either "Acceptable" or "Undersized". Next, Use the Dissolve tool and set that required fields as "Dissolve Fields" (including the one just added). If you only want contiguous undersized lots, then make sure you don't check the "Create Multipart features" option. 2. Instead of adding a field and calculating values, simply select all lots that are below the threshold area, then run the Dissolve as per above. Next, select all the lots that are above the threshold in the original dataset and append them to the output from the Dissolve to get a complete dataset. Dissolve (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
08-12-2024
08:36 PM
|
1
|
0
|
221
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
3 | Wednesday | |
1 | a week ago | |
2 | a week ago | |
1 | a week ago | |
1 | 08-01-2024 07:29 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|