|
POST
|
Geez.... hope you're doing something wrong (though I can't see what it would be) as I'm hoping that upgrading to 3.6 would fix this Bug! Will definitely hold out and wait to see what you determine. Seems like a pretty big downgrade if it's intentional.
... View more
12-02-2025
04:05 PM
|
2
|
0
|
671
|
|
POST
|
Hi Chris. I assume your user is truing to edit fields of an ArcGIS Online feature service in Pro? If so, then they won't be able to regardkess of license unless they are the owner of the feature service or jave an Administrator role. You might be able to setup a custom role with those permissions, but I haven't tried that before for this scenario. If its a feature class in a file geodatabase though (not in ArcGIS Online) then it comes down to user edit permissions on the file geodatabase.
... View more
11-29-2025
02:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
437
|
|
IDEA
|
When running a Model Builder tool that contains one of the built in Logical tools (e.g. If Row Count Is), it would be great if the tool still returned the green "Completed" result instead of the yellow "Warning" result due to a precondition not being met. Ultimately, branches of a model can both be valid results, but you will always get a "Warning" because one of them didn't run. It would be preferable if the overall model result was still in it's "Completed without warnings" state to prevent user confusion. Warnings should be reserved for unexpected outcomes (e.g. emtpy datasets when you expect data to have been generated). In my example model below, you can see a perfectly legitimate tool with 2 differnt Custom Message options will always return the Warning result.
... View more
11-26-2025
07:27 PM
|
3
|
1
|
307
|
|
POST
|
Hopefully addressed by the updated UI in ArcGIS Pro 3.6!
... View more
11-26-2025
07:16 PM
|
1
|
3
|
604
|
|
POST
|
Hey @ZachBodenner I just checked and the problem seems to have been resolved (ArcGIS Online - don't have Enterprise).
... View more
11-20-2025
04:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
220
|
|
POST
|
Depending on how complex your old scripts are, maybe put them into Copilot (AI) and ask it to change them to use Arcade instead. Hopefully that will get you close to a working product.
... View more
11-19-2025
04:44 PM
|
0
|
0
|
119
|
|
IDEA
|
100% agree that a way to match replicas to offline areas is needed, and that admin visibility of all offline areas (user generated or otherwise) is also very valuable. You've just confirmed something I suspected too in that when an offline area is removed, replicas are NOT removed from AGOL, continuing to consume storage credits. I don't understand why this is the case. If an offline area is removed from the device, surely there should be some way for Field Maps to update AGOL and tell it to remove the replica.
... View more
11-18-2025
05:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
317
|
|
IDEA
|
@MitchellGrafstein yeah, all our offline areas are user defined. We have too much variation and overlap between users and their areas of interest, so don't have any predefined offline areas. It's always a bit nerve wracking to make changes to things and wondering if it's going to impact peoples offline areas. I've got a pretty good understanding now of what will flow through to end users offline maps and what won't.
... View more
11-17-2025
04:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
337
|
|
IDEA
|
When downloading offline areas in Field Maps, it would be useful to see how long an offline area has been on the device. Over time, areas can become more unstable and users may want to remove and download new copies to recieve changes made to the map since it was downloaded. IDEA: Include a datestamp value showing when the offline area was created/downloaded in addition to when it was last sync'd.
... View more
11-16-2025
04:53 PM
|
3
|
5
|
409
|
|
IDEA
|
When using Field Maps, the screen timeout is annoying when using Field Maps for navigation whilst driving. It's one of the most common questions/complaints/requests we get from users who have shifted from using older (and more basic) apps like OziExplorer which keeps the screen on by default. This is especially important when using your device whilst driving and you're legally not supposed to interact with the device while operating the vehicle (an in lieu of the Apple Car Play/Android Auto requests still not being implemented). IDEA: Implement a manual toggle switch (at the top of the screen?) to permit the user to keep the screen on if desired, or; Permanently disable the device screen timeout settings when using Field Maps so that it is always on unless you press the devices lock screen button.
... View more
11-16-2025
04:29 PM
|
4
|
0
|
242
|
|
IDEA
|
This is clearly a different request (and I agree, a valid concern). Here's an idea thats loosely related about the offline calculation of fields - Improve performance of Arcade calculations when OF... - Esri Community Perhaps there's some overlap in them.
... View more
11-13-2025
04:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
418
|
|
IDEA
|
So, somehow I've managed to survive for years without coming across this issue....until now! The Statistic fields in Dissolve and Pairwise Dissolve do NOT honour "Create multipart features" option in these tools. If you leave "Create multipart features" unchecked, and are dissolving 3 polygons where 2 are adjacent and a 3rd is not adjacent and all contain an ID value to be concatenated as a Statistic field (e.g. A and B adjacent with C not adjacent), instead of producing 2 output polygons with a statistic fields that shows (polygon 1) A/B and (polygon 2) C, you get 2 polygons but both contain A/B/C in the concatenated field (as if they were a multipart polygon)! Visual example below (more reading here too). IDEA: Include an option (second checkbox or other method) to control whether the statistic fields should be calculated as per the singlepart output or original multipart functionality. Bonus points if it's enabled by default! P.S. Please update the documentation and tool tips of these tools to clearly state how these things work!
... View more
10-28-2025
05:57 PM
|
3
|
1
|
258
|
|
IDEA
|
How have I only just discovered this problem after over a decade of using this software! Obviously I've always used statistic fields with multipart dissolves (or just never noticed the errors!). Clearly, this has had no traction seeming as how it's a 15 year old post! I have submitted direct feedback from the ArcGIS Documentation page requesting more detail in the documentation and the tool tips in ArcGIS Pro around how Statistics don't honour the "Create multipart features" checkbox. Time to submit a new feature request I think!
... View more
10-28-2025
05:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
470
|
|
POST
|
Hopefully the plan does end up including Professional user types for the same reason that Creators should include it (increasing levels of functionality with increase license price - not decreasing). At least with Creator including it though, that will make a big impact - hopefully the price per license doesn't significantly change because of it though!
... View more
10-19-2025
05:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
432
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | 08-24-2025 06:11 PM | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 10-08-2024 09:01 PM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2025 12:17 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|