|
POST
|
Thanks for the tip about the new post. Good to see another WA rep on board! Seems nothing has changed regarding the lack of tracking functionality for Administrators/Professional Plus users, or the lack of development around nested feature development. The latter being something our organisation would utilise!
... View more
10-16-2025
01:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
212
|
|
POST
|
HI Kirk. It's a shame to see this is still the case. We don't actually utilise Location Tracking in our org at present, but for someone who is an Administrator or who holds a Professional/Professional plus license, you would expect full functionality to be included! Especially for smaller organisations where there may only be 1 to a few staff doing multiple functions.
... View more
10-16-2025
01:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
538
|
|
IDEA
|
@ColinLawrence thanks, but it's still not quite developed enough for our use cases. The below screenshot shows how Edit Multiple differs from Edit Single. In this case, the smart form, should hide fields that are not intended to be edited, whilst aren't strictly read only. Also, it should auto calc the Authorised Officer, but doesn't.
... View more
10-06-2025
05:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
299
|
|
IDEA
|
@ColinLawrence to me it sounds more like the request is for a "Select by Attribute" function, though the max 50 features for Edit Multiple may also be a constraint worthy of a separate idea. We are yet to implement any Edit Multiple functionality in our Field Maps due to it not honouring smart form functionality configured via Field Maps Designer.
... View more
10-05-2025
04:50 PM
|
0
|
0
|
332
|
|
POST
|
You can set your browser (Edge at least) to clear cookies from certain sites on close. Still not ideal, but it's an option in the short term.
... View more
10-01-2025
11:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
323
|
|
POST
|
I might need to look at this. I have a view that seems to work fine until I open the webmap in Field Maps, then it says it fails to load (with a JSON error). The same map works fine in the browser (and the view is only a few weeks old too).
... View more
09-25-2025
04:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
630
|
|
POST
|
I hear you! It's a great platform and all good until you want to make changes, then all the rules are out!
... View more
09-25-2025
04:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
630
|
|
POST
|
Ahhh not good. I've had mixed success with views and either updating them or swapping sources. It seems that the older they are, the less reliable the update process is. Could have something to do with how ArcGIS Online has changed over time, but I've never really got a straight answer from support when trying to troubleshoot. The outcome has almost always been the same - start from scratch.
... View more
09-23-2025
04:36 PM
|
0
|
2
|
707
|
|
POST
|
Just found this and can't see any related ideas - have submitted one. ArcGIS Survey123 Ideas - Esri Community
... View more
09-22-2025
08:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
201
|
|
IDEA
|
Simple idea - add support for more file types to Survey123 (ArcGIS Online) to support relevant documentation collection for things like incident reporting forms. We've just discovered that emails (.msg) and other file types (discussed here and documented here) aren't accepted so would need to be converted to PDF's first or Zipped.
... View more
09-22-2025
08:05 PM
|
3
|
2
|
281
|
|
POST
|
Have you considered/tried publishing a copy of the updated feature service, and then changing the data source of the views?
... View more
09-21-2025
06:32 PM
|
0
|
4
|
852
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @NaicongLi . Thanks for the additional information and context. I posted the idea to make the use of ArcGIS Pro for basic/entry level users easier to comprehend. Being able to see the ArcGIS Online/Enterprise names in the Contents pane is handy, and that it changes depending on the active portal is a good sign that what I propose is indeed possible. Essentially, I propose that the same thing happen in place of the term "Portal". Simply replace it with ArcGIS Online/ArcGIS Enterprise, or maybe Online Portal/Enterprise Portal to make it easier when accessing the Catalog Pane (how most of our users access Catalog in Pro).
... View more
09-18-2025
04:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
157
|
|
IDEA
|
Currently, contingent values can only be authored in ArcGIS Pro. Once a feature service is published to ArcGIS Online, then the contingent values can be configured in Field Maps Designer. If they weren't part of the original feature service, then they are not able to be configured Also, if you create a form in Survey123 Connect that contains filtered lists that act like contingent values, this is not honoured in ArcGIS Online/Field Maps Designer. This results in the form behaving like contingent values, but the same feature service then added to a smart form via Field Maps Designer does not - you get all values in each field. IDEA: When publishing a new form from Survey123 Connect that contains filtered lists (contingent values), store those as true contingent values and not just filtered lists. Likewise, enable the creation of contingent values in Field Maps Designer so that feature services can be modified without needing to be republished.
... View more
09-17-2025
05:04 PM
|
3
|
0
|
255
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | 08-24-2025 06:11 PM | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 10-08-2024 09:01 PM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2025 12:17 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|