|
POST
|
Thank you Kumar for getting back to me, and logging the issue. Not huge, but definitely good to know for training purposes.
... View more
10-26-2010
09:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
738
|
|
POST
|
I agree, Goh_Raj, that Jim is a very smart person who has a lot of good stuff on the forums to refer back to, and has a lot of reference for designing the forums, he has A LOT of experience with these forums. Father knows best. Less is more. I Second the better search capability, again... Ted, what happened to: "...it would be nice to have the capability to just have access to the 1 python forum..." "...which why I am thinking, a python category makes sense." Seems like "Python Scripting" is an important "Function" and is becoming more so for many of us... I only stated that Jim is a VERY smart person and he knows best. I still think python should have its own category. The more capability we see with python, the more sense to me, that it has its own category. Python is not just GP tools, it has its own window now, which may be using tools, but I think python has moved a bit past just GP. Less is more, is just that, maybe I should just say, Simple is better than complex, Sparse is better than dense... Python itself could easily have more than one category, but for this I say Less is more.
... View more
10-26-2010
09:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1365
|
|
POST
|
I agree, Goh_Raj, that Jim is a very smart person who has a lot of good stuff on the forums to refer back to, and has a lot of reference for designing the forums, he has A LOT of experience with these forums. Father knows best. Less is more. I Second the better search capability, again...
... View more
10-26-2010
07:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1545
|
|
POST
|
If I choose to use your QC layout, I get the Change Warning, which I expect, however, when I close ArcMap, and I do not save my changes, shouldn't my settings return to what they were before I selected your template. My expectation is that they should go back to what they were set at prior to choosing your QC layout, if I say No to Save the Changes. If I reopen, the changes that I did not save are still in effect, meaning I get the QC layout regardless of saving or not saving. Is this the expected behavior?
... View more
10-25-2010
05:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
590
|
|
POST
|
It seems like if you give us the capability to switch to a QC layout for toolbars from the Customize - Production - Toolbar Settings, you should also allow us to customize this functionality for QC as well, rather than go with what you have set for us. Currently, I can choose your layout, but I cannot create my own layout and have it reside here in the menu. I know this is functionality in PM, but if this is exposed with just a Reviewer Install, there should also be the capability for us to modify our own QC template and set it from within the Docking Manager.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:50 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2074
|
|
POST
|
Not sure if this is a feature, but if I browse my selections, then press the unselect button from within Core ArcMap, then browse to next record, on the browse dialog, I now reselect the one record, and it seems like the browse selections never go away, unless I do another Check to get new records to review, is this the expected behavior, because I like this behavior.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:40 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1868
|
|
POST
|
When I select Grid Cells, then label the grid, my selection disappears. Conversely, If I have have labels and a selection and turn off labels, my selection disappears, shouldn't the selection stay selected regardless of turning on or off the labels in the Reviewer Overview Window. The Label Grids is unselecting my Selection.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:33 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2553
|
|
POST
|
If I am in the Reviewer Table, and I Select All the records in the table, switch the radio button to show Selected from All, then switch back to show all, nothing is shown to be selected in the table itself, however, If I move the scroll bar up, the selection returns, so the refresh is not refreshing to show the table selection. This is the behavior of a docked Reviewer Table. For a pinned table, If I select All, then switch to show selected, and then back to All, one record, the top most record is shown as being selected, when I move the vertical scroll bar, the rest of the selections are now shown to be selected. Different behavior between pinned and not pinned, and not expected behavior when Select All is chosen. A few bugs here. Furthermore, when I have a pinned window, where I select all, switch to show selected, then switch back to all without touching the vertical scroll bar, then back to selected, no selections are shown, no vertical scroll bar, however, if I Select All, Switch to Selected, then back to All, touch vertical scroll bar, then back to selected, Selections are in the window. Selections need to be retained. In this last example, the behavior is the same for both pinned and docked window, in that I need to touch the vertical scroll bar, to retian the selections that have already been selected. NOTE: I am not Clearing Selections, so therefore, my selections should not disappear.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:26 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2134
|
|
POST
|
There is a similar behavior where I select the Advanced Button to bring up the additional Tabs, when I select Advanced and click Apply, I expect the second time, I open the manager to see the additional tabs already displayed in the dialog. Currently, I need to reselect Advanced every time I open the Reviewer Manager dialog. This requires more button clicks. End Session remains pressed, shouldn't the Advanced Button remain pressed as well.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
484
|
|
POST
|
If I select How to write results on the Reviewer Methods Tab, via the Data Reviewer Table Writer, if I then click Apply and Close, when I reopen the dialog, I expect to see the How to Write Results populated with the Data Reviewer Table Writer selection that I selected, Applied in the first step, but currently, every time I select open the Session Manager, and go to the Reviewer Methods Tab, the drop down is blank, as if I did not complete the first step the first time, or Apply did not work, either way, I would expect to set this value and have the value get retained in the properties somehow.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:06 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1977
|
|
POST
|
When I select the Reviewer Table properties Fields Tab, I expect that I should be able to use my middle scroll wheel, to scroll up and down on the tab, since the tab is active. The current behavior is that I have to select the vertical scrollbar, before my middle scroll wheel will activate and scroll down or up.
... View more
10-25-2010
05:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1681
|
|
POST
|
It seems like there are three places to setup a grid, why not have one location where I set a grid to be used for Reviewer throughout the product. I can define it from the Overview Window Active Grid Section. I can set a Grid on the Reviewer Table properties Grid Tab and I can access the Grid Tab from the Reviewer Session Manager Advanced Reviewer Methods, which looks to be exactly like the Reviewer Table properties, but in this case, I set it in one location and it did not get set in the other location, so perhaps these two could be linked, or perhaps this is a bug. Just thinking that if they all serve the same purpose, it would be nice to streamline this part of the setup, so I set it once, and it is reflected everywhere. Perhaps there are additional location to set Grid that I have not discovered, yet.
... View more
10-25-2010
04:57 PM
|
0
|
3
|
4194
|
|
POST
|
Is there a way to select a row, and expand all rows to fit the text inside of the column, something akin to what I would be able to do inside of excel, where I can fit to height/width? If not, this would be a nice enhancement to the Reviewer Table capability. I can add to ideas if you want. It seems like the grid should have more flexibility with formatting.
... View more
10-25-2010
04:43 PM
|
0
|
7
|
4301
|
|
POST
|
A feature is considered Not Simple when its geometry is topologically incorrect. Please see the following link regarding ITopologicalOperator.Simplify Method: http://help.arcgis.com/en/sdk/10.0/arcobjects_cpp/componenthelp/index.html#/Simplify_Method/000w000003w0000000/ What software was used to capture the parcel layer? Have you run the Check Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens? Have you run the Repair Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens? I will chime in here for Bart, since he is home sick, the data was input via COGO, it may have been Workstation for these two polygons. As far as I know both of these tools were not run on the data, so thank you we will investigate these further with these two tools. I too, have seen some non simple lines, but they make sense, in that they are typically lines that need exploding, and the polys that I have seen were for Books/Pages, and one can clearly see where the issues are, so I will need to recheck with Bart when he makes it in, hopefully later this week. Thanks again Dan for your assistance in this matter.
... View more
10-25-2010
04:27 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6578
|
|
POST
|
When working with the multi part Line and multi part polygon Checks, if i select explode to break apart the multi part geometries, the first time, it actually deletes the selection, then I undo, and re run explode, then the geometries are exploded as expected. I am seeing this fairly consistent, the first I run these checks after creating a new session. So, for instance, I choose the single check parcel lines, the first time I select explode, the parcel lines, are deleted, then undo, then explode the second time, and I am good to go. If I then move to another feature via Browse, I am successful the first time for each subsequent explode where nothing is deleted. However, if I then run the multi part polygon tool, on say Parcels, the first time, the parcels are deleted, then I undo, then re run explode, and the geometries are correctly exploded. Each subsequent explode is then run successfully. Does this make sense? If you need me to put up a video on Youtube, let me know.
... View more
10-25-2010
04:14 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2053
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 08-01-2022 02:13 PM | |
| 1 | 08-04-2022 02:37 PM | |
| 1 | 08-01-2022 02:10 PM | |
| 1 | 08-01-2022 02:30 PM | |
| 3 | 06-21-2022 02:07 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-16-2026
06:11 PM
|