IDEA
|
Thanks @RichardHowe - I'll look at this more closely as an alternative solution.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
66
|
IDEA
|
I would like to be able to bulk delete groups as an administrator. Currently, there is no way on the "groups" page to select more than one group and take action on it. On the items/content page, one can do more with groups. I came across this while trying to delete many groups that were created with Community Analyst. I'd like to bulk delete these groups from the UI, but finding that there isn't an easy solution. The Community Analyst groups are easy to find as most of their descriptions contain "Community Analyst Project Group". Not sure if this was possible before the UI interface change where one now how to click on the "view details" button on the right side of the item, but finding I want to do more with groups than just one by one.
... View more
08-16-2024
04:09 PM
|
4
|
2
|
166
|
IDEA
|
Agree. Finding that there are legacy files that had a delete protection assigned to them (old StoryMap Tour templates), but through the interface, there's now way to bulk disable the delete protection.
... View more
08-16-2024
04:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
64
|
IDEA
|
For our higher education institution we have a desire to have more control over who we allow to take licenses offline as well! We want to support as many users as possible, but we don't want to open it up to all users; only the ones who really need it and and understand the implications of taking an ArcGIS Pro license offline (e.g. if your have a license checked out, you cannot sign into another ArcGIS Pro on another computer. You must check it in first). We used to support offline licenses through Single-Use and Concurrent-Use licenses, but those are going away/gone so there is currently no easy way to allow a subset of users permission to take a licenses out into the field/ship/offline. Because we don't want to enable offline licensing for our entire campus, we are currently exploring the following options as a way to get around enabling access to all: Working with the user to "flip' the switch' to allow offline licenses for a few minutes, and then turning it off after the user confirms they have an offline license. However this can create complications for trying to check licenses back in. Creating a new local account for a member or a computer lab on a ship, and giving them access to an offline license in the same manner above. Would it be possible to support "offline licensing" as a permission that could be assigned to a Role? This would mean an administrator could leverage a Role to support offline licensing to a subset of users. Having some sort of control over offline licensing besides all or none is extremely desirable.
... View more
08-15-2024
12:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
66
|
IDEA
|
We recently setup a notebook to auto reallocate credits to university users who have suddenly used all their credits. I would like to customize the message that goes out to the user and admins stating that "their account should be reallocated with credits within 15 minutes". However at this time, I'm unable to customize that message so I'm still receiving a number of emails from patrons asking to have additional credits. If I could customize the automatic message from Esri, the end-user would know right away that they will have additional credits in 15 minutes. This will reduce their stress they encounter when working on an assignment or project.
... View more
03-01-2024
09:50 PM
|
0
|
0
|
88
|
IDEA
|
As another ArcGIS Online organization with 4,000+ users, we are rapidly encroaching our feature storage limit (79%). In addition to seeing credit by user on the member user management, it would also be nice to set those limits for both feature storage or image storage (file storage). Another thing I'd like to add to storage quotas is actually displaying the storage usage of users in the member management window. Or at least enable this as a toggle to turn on or off. Yes, I can get some of those values from the Organizational Items report and do pivot tables, but it would be great to quickly access who are my largest storage users.
... View more
03-01-2024
09:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
211
|
BLOG
|
Thanks @PeterKnoop! I'll pass this information along. Yes, it's a 1-band raster of lines that they want digitized.
... View more
10-30-2023
08:55 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2052
|
BLOG
|
@BrianBaldwin - I had another one to add to this list--ArcScan. I have a student who needs to do large scale digitization of raster data to vector data. I found something that led me to ArcScan . It's an extension in ArcMap, but in other forums, it looks like there hasn't been any movement to include ArcScan in Pro.
... View more
10-27-2023
01:31 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2088
|
IDEA
|
This would be a great addition to support those students who are asked to create StoryMaps as a final project. The students have no/little GIS experience and won't necessarily use the ArcGIS Online side of things. This places the task of creating groups either on the professors or someone else to help create a group and set it up. Yes, the students can do so, but if they could create a group and identity the group members directly from the ArcGIS StoryMaps site, it would make using and sharing StoryMaps with others easier for all involved.
... View more
06-29-2023
11:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
560
|
BLOG
|
One functionality that I have someone looking for in ArcGIS Pro is the integration to a CAD surface modeler. Desktop has a very old plugin that exports directly 3D supported files to sketchup. It's a plugin that was created for version 9.X but has been working since then. It gives you the option to export any vector and raster data to a sketchup file with an option to add base height and extrusion from table fields.
... View more
06-29-2023
09:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6591
|
IDEA
|
Agree! This sometimes confuses many users who just want the export. They don't need/want another item in their AGO content.
... View more
02-24-2023
08:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
736
|
IDEA
|
The “Reassign Content” and “Receive Content” privileges in the Content grouping are great in concept; however, I have privacy concerns with current arrangement that prevents me from enabling this across a university organization. The idea would be to rethink the process for how users transfer ownership of content by supporting notifications and/or other communication between those transferring and those receiving content to address current privacy concerns. This is specifically for the permissions of a user, not the permissions listed under the Administrative functions. Currently when I assign this permission to a user, it automatically grants those assigned this privilege to view folders for all users within the organization who can “receive content”. I’d like to give this permission to students to transfer class or research content to their faculty or research partners, but in order to do this additional privacy measures need to be addressed. Even if I’m receiving content, why does a user need to grant someone else the ability to view all their folders? One idea from this post Option to Restrict the 'Reassign Ownership' privilege based on Administrative Groups, or similar does a good summary of this: “Perhaps another way to address this is to put the power of transferring ownership in the combined hands of the owner of the content and the person who is receiving it. The content owner could select one or more items and specify a receiving user. That would trigger notification to the receiving user, and they could review the list of content and choose to accept or reject the items.” Without these privacy concerns addressed, the burden to transfer ownership of content for universities and other educational entities will likely fall on a few individuals who will have to micromanage this.
... View more
02-10-2023
05:11 PM
|
5
|
1
|
1654
|
IDEA
|
Create a more streamlined way to transfer/clone ArcGIS StoryMaps from one organization to another. There are several suggested ways to clone and/or transfer an ArcGIS StoryMap from one organization to another. However, these are “workarounds” and still requires a lot of work in order to transfer, including the proper permissions in the source and destination organizations, bugs and other issues depending on the version of ArcGIS API for Python one is using, and having to “re-build” a StoryMap in the destination organization if certain layers don’t transfer but instead are “referenced” back to the source organization. We are seeing a number of users from our University who are collaborating with organizations who have AGO orgs and wish to transfer their work to the partner/collaborator upon completion. As the demand to create ArcGIS StoryMaps increases across our campus, so too does the demand to transfer/clone ArcGIS StoryMaps. The inability to quickly and efficiently create a clone and transfer to another organization is becoming a larger blocker. Here are some existing resources for cloning/transferring ArcGIS StoryMaps pulled from the community. Notebook from Peter Knoop: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-storymaps-blog/cloning-arcgis-storymaps/bc-p/903720#M43 ArcGIS API for Python sample code: https://developers.arcgis.com/python/samples/clone-storymap-version2/ AGO Assistant Common Workflow to Copy a StoryMap: https://guide.assistant.esri-ps.com/docs/common-workflows There are already lots of posts on this topic, but I can't find a formal idea: https://community.esri.com/t5/forums/searchpage/tab/message?q=Transfer%20storymaps&advanced=false
... View more
02-10-2023
04:21 PM
|
10
|
0
|
472
|
POST
|
We are seeing this error recently with several classes on our campus. We are using ArcGIS Pro 2.9.3 on a .net 4.000 framework. They are experiencing this when trying to export a layout (pdf,jpeg) to a network storage drive. File paths have been updated to remove all spaces. They aren't using raster data. Their projects are now corrupted. Has anyone else experienced this recently?
... View more
11-04-2022
05:15 PM
|
0
|
0
|
340
|
IDEA
|
Thanks @KoryKramer . Here are some additional thoughts to good questions. 1. The software is installed on both campus controlled lab machines and personal laptops. For the campus based machines, we do NOT currently block notifications. Sometimes it is useful to know that there is an update, regardless if you can update or not. Most instructors can clarify with their students what version they should be using for class. Of course there will always be those who don't listen and still upgrade, but that's on them. 2. I agree with @PatIampietro and @Willen that the idea would be able to allow users to select what supported version they want to download. Again, more on making other versions available rather than just the latest and one version back. While we as a campus encourage users to be on a particular version, we still have some researchers who are on a particular version due to certain tools and others. For example we are in a trial with ArcGIS Indoors, and the ELT tool would not work with the latest versions of ArcGIS Pro. It would only work with ArcGIS Pro 2.7 (Esri is aware of the incompatibility with the ETL tools and Pro). So we had to go in and find that version and make it available to students. It would have been great to just tell the students to go and download that version from AGO. 3. I don't think I would need to cap the number of versions of ArcGIS Pro per student. We have students who are enrolled in classes and then many other students and researchers who are using the software outside of the class. I would like to enable the SSO we have setup for our AGO to say, if you are affiliate with our AGO and you would like to download the software go here. Currently I'm still having to be very involved in providing access to earlier versions of software in addition to providing technical support on the use of the software. I would just want the option to make the software available and enable the user to select what version to download based on their research needs or class instructions. It would be up to the campuses or Orgs to specify to their users what version their campus is using. With this last line stated about providing guidance to their users/members on what version they should download, it seems like it would be extra work to build in a function that would add say an * next to the "this Org recommends this version". Again, I would look at going with a simple implementation of just making other supported versions of ArcGIS Pro available for download from the AGO interface.
... View more
10-14-2022
12:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
597
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
4 | 08-16-2024 04:09 PM | |
1 | 10-30-2023 08:55 AM | |
1 | 10-27-2023 01:31 PM | |
5 | 02-10-2023 05:11 PM | |
10 | 02-10-2023 04:21 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|