|
POST
|
Shannon - I am running 10.7.1 Enterprise Portal and occasionally for no apparent reason, one or two of my thumbnails will be defaulted to the map icon instead of the assigned application's icon. These are simple icons created in Paint and saved on the same server as the Portal instance. Could this problem be related to the original question here? Thanks David
... View more
04-20-2020
11:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
310
|
|
POST
|
Same need - Need a widget to select polygons within another polygon.
... View more
02-20-2020
01:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
930
|
|
POST
|
Douglas, - Can the link actually link to a folder and not a document or pic inside the folder? i.e. http://ntxxxxxx/Pictures/shortcut.lnk
... View more
01-30-2020
07:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1336
|
|
DOC
|
Jake Skinner - Thanks for this documentation. I have everything working except when I attempt to send to multiple recipients, only the first recipient (myself) is the only one to actually receive the email. However, when the email comes into my outlook inbox, the email is showing the other recipients should have received the email (but they didn't). My script uses the format below in the toEmail: toEmail = 'xxxx@xxxxx.com; xxxxx@xxxx.com' # Email receiver(s) Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.
... View more
01-06-2020
07:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
12961
|
|
POST
|
Adrian, We have a huge base of CAD Microstation drawings that we use in GIS after converting with the esri CADtoGeodatabase tool. Modifying each drawing format to add Tags would be a lot of work. Annotation is the only problem we seem to be having and it is related to the unpredictability of the Coded value assignments under subtypes for the Annotation. The coded value assignment really needs to honor the level structure of the original CAD drawing to make the data usable for merges, appends, etc without corrupting the data. For example: One CAD Drawing for a system may have three levels used as DGN#1 has Level11, Level1, and Level3. A second drawing with very similar info DGN#2 uses only Level11, and Level3 (Omitting Level1). After using CADtoGeodatabase to convert the two DGNs to GDB: (GDB)DGN#1 Annotation Assigns Coded values 0,1, and 2 for Level11, Level1, and Level3 respectively. (GDB)DGN#2 Annotation Assigns Coded values 0 and 1 for Level11, and Level3 respectively. The Problem: Subsequent merges are based on Subtype Coded Values. Problem Description: Merging converted data from (GDB)DGN#2 into (GDB)DGN#1 results in (GDB)DGN#1 Level1 having (GDB)DGN#2's Level3 data being merged into (GDB)DGN#1's Level1 (All Coded Value1). This data scrambling causes improperly displayed data in the original (GDB)DGN#1 Map Annotation Layers. Problem Summary: Level3 Data has been merged into Level1 because they are merged based on coded values. I also suspect that this problem can occur with CADtoGeodatabase conversions of the same file with only a different version or date stamp. I have not been able to confirm this but I have seen some strange behavior like this that makes me believe the subtype coded value assignments are totally (or nearly) random from conversion to conversion. Not sure if this link will work for you or not but here is my link to the bug. https://my.esri.com/#/support/bugs/BUG-000113627
... View more
04-16-2019
10:10 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1817
|
|
POST
|
The CAD to Geodatabase tool apparently lacks programming to assure consistent repeatable conversions of the DGN Levels and Font Size. During the conversion the subtype coded values are not consistently assigned the same Subtype coded values. This deficiency renders the tool useless in providing reliable and repeatable conversions for updating Geodatabases with CAD source. The inconsistent subsequent conversions cause expected data to not be displayed in the expected ArcMap Layer and/or unexpected data to be displayed in random layers. CAD is our authoritative and continuously updated background data used in our GIS. We must be able to routinely, reliably, and consistently convert CAD to Geodatabase while honoring Annotation Subtype Coded Values in respect of DGN Levels and font sizing for proper display in GIS Maps and Applications. The current tool is not providing consistent results and has caused countless hours of rework and troubleshooting of problems resulting from this deficiency. Subsequent data manipulation attempts on similar annotation data sets results in scrambled levels/layers. This seems so elementary in the requirements for CAD to Geodatabase conversions but there does not seem to be a good tool that can handle this basic functionality. I'm also open to other suggestions for utilizing CAD DGNs in maps and services. Reference ESRI #BUG-000113627 (Escalated)
... View more
03-28-2019
01:13 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1952
|
|
POST
|
Jay, Isn't CADtoGDB a Model only function that is not available as a stand alone python script? I am calling my model from within the python script. Are you doing the same? Thanks David
... View more
01-22-2019
12:42 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1125
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the response. We have been doing the conversions for quite some time and just beginning to identify problems when merging data from very similar CAD files. The problems do seem to originate from CAD files with an extra layer used which seems to cause re-aligning of the coded values. Then merges/appends seem to be based on coded values.
... View more
02-27-2018
05:15 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1167
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the reply Adrian. For a hypothetical example: Master DGN contains Annotation (and Polylines) levels 3 and 8 Incoming DGN contains Annotation (and Polylines) levels 1, 3, 8, and 11 Both will be converted to Geodatabases called MasterGeoCAD and IncomingGeoCAD respectively. I need to be able to reliably merge data from IncomingGeoCAD Levels 3 and 8 (I assume: Most likely assigned Coded Values 1 and 2) into MasterGeoCAD levels 3 and 8 (I assume: Most likely assigned Coded Values 0 and 1 respectively). I think this would INCORRECTLY cause Coded Value 1/Level 3 IncomingGeoCAD data to be assigned to Coded Value 1/Level 8 in the MasterGeoCAD; assuming the values would be merged based on coded values. *****Does the CAD to GDB tool have the ability to assign Coded value 3 to Level 3, Coded Value 11 to Level 11, etc? If so, this would be great! *****
... View more
02-26-2018
09:22 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1167
|
|
POST
|
I'm trying to better understand how the Cad to GDB conversion works relative especially to Annotation being assigned a Coded Value in the GDB based on level within the DGN. The assignment of the Coded Value seems almost random and this causes issues when attempting to merge data from two very similar but slightly differing DGN layer structure files into one GDB Feature Class. It seems for example that coded value 1 may represent level 60 in one converted GDB Annotation Feature Class and coded value 1 may be assigned to level 11 in another very similar file with the exception that the other DGN file does not have level 60 used or turned on (not sure which at this point). My problem seems to arrive when merging the two File GDB Annotation Feature Classes that have been converted from DGN files). The two files are merged based on the seemingly random assigned coded values that were established during the CAD to GDB conversion instead of honoring the actual DGN level assignments. This produces an output which seems to indicate what we had previously called "Annotation Jumping Levels". I cannot understand how the the CAD to GDB conversion determines the order of level assignments. It would seem to me that the coded value should be matched to the Level... Always without exception. If so, it seems this would eliminate the apparent "Annotation Jumping Levels". Am I missing something??
... View more
02-21-2018
01:31 PM
|
0
|
5
|
1358
|
|
IDEA
|
We need a way in WebApp Builder - WAB to simply modify an existing WebApp Builder Widget to make it custom. For example a way to add my default rest endpoints and/or pre-configure a widget for internal use in Portal without having to reconfigure the widget over and over again for each application. It would be really nice to be able to have a button to save widget configurations to Default; of course another button would be needed to reset the widget to factory defaults. "Save Widget As Configured" to new widgetXXXXX would be great!
... View more
01-18-2018
11:04 AM
|
5
|
0
|
614
|
|
IDEA
|
We need a way in WebApp Builder - WAB to simply modify an existing WebApp Builder Widget to make it custom. For example a way to add my default rest endpoints and/or pre-configure a widget for internal use in Portal without having to reconfigure the widget over and over again for each application. It would be really nice to be able to have a button to save widget configurations to Default; of course another button would be needed to reset the widget to factory defaults. "Save Widget As Configured" to new widgetXXXXX would be great!
... View more
01-18-2018
11:04 AM
|
6
|
0
|
1494
|
|
IDEA
|
I am often asked to provide information on usage of our GIS applications. The usage information can be very helpful in providing cost justification for GIS Programs. I would like to see a simple hit counter widget that could increment each time an application was accessed. I realize there are statistics available on a per service level, but that does not really provide me the same information as a simple hit counter for the application. In addition to using the proposed widget in a per application case, ideally the widget should be flexible enough to be used in a dashboard type of application for multiple application hit counters within a central dashboard.
... View more
06-14-2017
10:36 AM
|
27
|
5
|
3539
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-17-2024 08:19 PM | |
| 1 | 08-14-2024 10:41 AM | |
| 1 | 01-03-2024 07:47 AM | |
| 1 | 06-26-2023 05:22 AM | |
| 1 | 12-05-2022 09:15 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
4 weeks ago
|