Latest Contributions by JustinOdell

Ah, think this is how I did it: How To: Calculate unique identifier values similar to Global IDs  However, I am now getting lower-case Global ID characters whereas before I was getting upper-case. Not sure if this has anything to do with a version upgrade from 10.3.1 to 10.7.1? ... View more

Thanks Jake. Yes, I did have GUIDs populated in both Origin and Destination tables. I was able to resolve my situation by doing the following: Open Origin (feature class) attribute table and select relevant rows. Open Destination (table) attribute table and select relevant row. Add Production Editing toolbar to ArcMap Start Editing (this took a very long time due to the number of features in my feature class - some 30,000+) In the 'Manage Features' window, click 'Update' tab Expand the Destination table, and then expand the identified relationship Right click the Origin feature class under this relationship, and select 'Add Selected'. (This took a very long time!) Save edits (this took a very long time too). I'm not sure if there is a more efficient way of establishing relationships in more recent versions of ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro. If there is, then my issue will hopefully be better dealt with in the future. Alternatively, is it not possible to create a 'Relate' geoprocessing tool which can establish relationships between tables once the relationship class has been selected? ... View more

Were you ever able to resolve this issue? ... View more

Thanks Dan, though so many unresolved threads... Can this issue be resolved without switching to Drone2Map? ... View more

Yes I understand they are just pictures. It is UAV data captured from a flight plan, all done in GPS mode. The images aren't orthorectified. They have a central lat/lon in the EXIF. This is why I am using the imagery & orthomapping tools. ... View more

Yeah so the extents is reporting this, regardless of whether I apply a spatial reference or not. So the images don't have a native coordinate system it seems, and you're not able to trick it into thinking what it is. Strangely, I have imagery from a different sensor, but same manufacturer, and the EXIF is exactly the same. Yet that imagery will run through the ortho mapping process without any problems. ... View more

I am getting the same errors reported by Paul at the start of this thread, however my altitudes are coming in positive. Any other ideas why this might be occurring? I am using ArcGIS Pro 2.2.4, and ArcGIS 10.6.1. I notice in ArcCatalog that there is no spatial reference associated with my images. I understand how this would be a problem. However when I apply the correct coordinate system, either projected or geographic, ArcMap still throws this error: ... View more

I propose a web service (possibly Feature Service) available in AGOL, which can be either consumed directly by a GIS, or downloaded as a static file.  The service would present the geographic areas as described by the relevant attributes, from the necessary documentation available through the How To: Select the correction geographic (datum) transformation when projecting between datums page. I have successfully created an unshared web service for Table 1 of the ArcGIS 10.3.1 Geographic Transformation Table, so I know this is possible. ... View more

Thanks Bo, I have had a bit of a play around with the checkbox you identified, but still am not really any clearer on how to achieve what I want. I've noticed the data frame is changing around which I don't think I want. I want to set it and forget it. The data frame is naturally my area of interest. Do I need to shrink the data frame within the map layout to account for the grid/graticule elements that will be generated around it? How can I get the grid/graticule elements to fall exactly within my neatline? How do you know how much paper space the XML grid numbering system will take up? How do you ensure it fits within the neatline whilst maintaining the area of interest at the correct scale? ... View more

The same issue was frustrating me for a long time. I'm unsure if this problem is easier to handle in newer versions of ArcMap, but certainly in 10.3 I was surprised to find this was the resolution. Converting labels to annotation in a geodatabase locks in a single reference scale. This is no good if you have Data Driven Pages with differing scales. By converting labels to annotation In the map, you are then able to go into the Data Frame properties > Annotation Groups tab and you will see a new Group has been created. Turn off the <Default> Group and change the Reference Scale on the newly created Group to <None>.  ... View more