Latest Contributions by Bud

@wayfaringrob  Shift is for adding, Ctrl is for subtracting. Interesting. ArcMap didn't work like that. I was unaware that's how it works in Pro. Related: Selection keyboard shortcuts How to request ArcGIS Pro video topics? For example, a video on adding or subtracting selected features from an existing selection ... View more

I’m not following. Can you provide more details? ... View more

Great idea. It’s confusing when we get that error. ... View more

Is your join one-to-many? If the answer is no, are you 100% sure? I ask because one-to-many joins in ArcGIS Pro are pretty buggy. Is ArcGIS Pro the right tool for tabular/join-based geodatabase analysis? Possibly related: Join with definition query: Export has more rows than input (definition query is ignored) Esri Case: 03619440 BUG-000167563, BUG-000135505 Definition query on join returns incorrect rows Esri Case: 03387420 Possibly the same issue: ArcGIS Pro Table Join Shows Wrong Records Some related thoughts here: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/arcgis-pro-3-3-1-exporting-join-creates-null/m-p/1512545/highlight/true#M86209  ... View more

Sometimes, there are "regression bugs" in Pro. An issue was fixed in a previous version, but then the devs made a mistake and the issue re-appears in a newer version. I've seen that a handful of times. ... View more

I have some road line feature selected in the map. I can use the CTRL key and click+drag to deselect some of the roads, since I don't want them selected. That works as expected. But sometimes I try to use SHIFT instead of CTRL, which doesn't work, only CTRL works this way. That causes confusion because it seems like SHIFT should work. Could Pro be enhanced to honour SHIFT as well? I’m unable to provide a video at the moment. ... View more

Could you create a point route event layer instead of lines? I wonder if you could post a similar question in the Esri Roads and Highways community, even though you're not using that product. I assume the Route Event Layer tool is still relavent to that community. Does the map or layer have some sort of XY tolerance setting? You could also report it as a bug to Esri support. ... View more

If you don’t get an answer, you could post it as an idea. If the data is in an enterprise or mobile geodatabase: If this is an absolute must-have, as a very, very last resort, you might be able to do it using a spatial database view. I tried something similar (a linear referencing/dynamic segmentation spatial view) using SDE.ST_ST_GEOMETRY data in Oracle, but the math was horribly complicated and performance was awful. It was better with SDO_GROMETRY, but still pretty ugly. Likely not worth doing. Maybe you could generate a static linear referencing/dynamic segmentation FC using ArcPy instead. ... View more

@DrewFlater  You mentioned “This was an error that was corrected at 2.8.” However, we’re seeing the issue at Pro 2.9.5. When I add an EGDB FC to the map, the FC has permanent symbology and labelling applied.  Thoughts? ... View more

If I remember correctly, SDE.ST_GEOMETRY automatically densifies as well, just like Arcade does. So that might not help much. Vince, in the Data Management community, could likely shed light on how ST_GEOMETRY vertices are stored -- in the "CAD BLOB," which is separate from the true vertex count. ... View more

Sounds similar to what I had in BUG-000146098 ... View more

Related: Arcade: Return a custom informational message to the application ... View more

ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5; Oracle 18c 10.7.1 EGDB: Contents Pane > List By Data Source tab: It would be great if we could right-click the data source grouping to change the source of all layers in the grouping, such as changing the .SDE connection. All within a single action. Related: ArcGIS Pro Set/Update Data source for all layers in a Map   ... View more

Does the Join Field geoprocessing tool (exports a copy FC) behave the same way as Add Join (dynamic)? ... View more

If your join is one-to-many, you could try creating a one-to-one join instead and see if you have the same issue. Pro now has the option to choose the join type: Choose if join will be one-to-first or 1:Many You could also try removing any definition queries to see if it behaves differently. ... View more