|
IDEA
|
Esri Case #03703536 - Deleting domain deletes the domain value only instead of entire domain Also, right-clicking > Delete on the domain value (code/description) row header deletes the entire domain. Whereas I would have expected it only to delete the specific domain value (code/description). Support says: ...the Esri Inc analyst confirmed that the correct procedure to delete the entire domain with multiple codes before saving the changes is clicking twice the domain header row and then right-click, selecting "delete" and the domain along with all the codes will be deleted. That behavior is unexpected/unintuitive, but it sounds like it is working as designed. Idea: Right-click a row header once in the domain or domain value (code/description) section to delete that specific row, before saving the domain.
... View more
09-05-2024
02:26 PM
|
0
|
2
|
911
|
|
IDEA
|
@JonathanNeal and @JillScholz_esri Make Query Table has functionality that lets us generate an OBJECTID field on the fly in feature layers and table views. The OBJECTID values are truly unique, even if the relationship of the "join" is one-to-many. Make Query Table (Data Management) > Key Field Options parameter Generate a key field—If no key fields have been specified, an Object ID field that uniquely identifies each row in the output table will be generated. Could the same mechanism be used in the attribute table of a proper one-to-many join via Add Join? Would that help solve the 1:M join selection issue (duplicate OBJECTIDs)? BUG-000154798: The 'Select By Attributes' tool does not select only records with specified field values added through a one-to-many join but instead selects all records with duplicate ObjectIDs.
... View more
09-05-2024
08:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1954
|
|
POST
|
Add Join — Pseudo-ObjectID (row number) as unique ID field for 1:M join
... View more
09-05-2024
08:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1498
|
|
POST
|
Make Query Table (Data Management) You can provide a key field option and key fields list. This information defines how rows are uniquely identified and is used to add a dynamically generated Object ID field to the data. Without an Object ID field, selections will not be supported. How to join using Make Query Table? Limitation: The data in a Make Query Table can't be edited.
... View more
09-05-2024
06:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1505
|
|
IDEA
|
Make Query Table (Data Management) You can provide a key field option and key fields list. This information defines how rows are uniquely identified and is used to add a dynamically generated Object ID field to the data. Without an Object ID field, selections will not be supported. How to join using Make Query Table? Limitation: The data in a Make Query Table can't be edited.
... View more
09-05-2024
06:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1966
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5; Oracle 18c 10.7.1 eGDB; traditional versioning (moving edits to base): I'm a non-I.T. ArcGIS Pro power user who has full Data Creator privileges for a .SDE database connection/owner. I want to do some professional development in Portal and am wondering if there are any benefits to publishing the eGDB data (that I already have full access to in Pro) as a feature service in Portal, and then use that feature service back in Pro. For example, if I want to hide certain FC fields from users when they're editing the data in the FC, could I (or the administrator) publish the FC as a Portal feature service with some fields hidden, and then users would use/edit it in Pro, only seeing select fields? I'm aware that I can hide the fields using the Fields View in an .APRX in Pro. But that's easily overridable by users in Pro. Whereas I'm wondering if hiding the fields in the feature service would be a more robust option. Or hide certain rows in a feature service, but still allow editing, which might be more robust than feature layer filter mechanisms in Pro. Are there any other benefits to a SDE > feature service > Pro setup that might be worth testing?
... View more
09-04-2024
09:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
578
|
|
POST
|
Out of curiosity, if the table is empty (zero rows), can you change the scale? What kind of geodatabase? For example, Oracle 18c 10.7.1 enterprise geodatabase.
... View more
09-04-2024
09:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
774
|
|
POST
|
What kind of geodatabase? For example, Oracle 18c 10.7.1 enterprise geodatabase. Can you share some fake data as a screenshot, excel spreadsheet, or a zipped file GDB or zipped mobile GDB?
... View more
09-04-2024
08:57 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3275
|
|
IDEA
|
@AlfredBaldenweck Oh, good to know. Thanks. Esri, feel free to close.
... View more
09-04-2024
07:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1203
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5 In the Catalog Pane > right-click menu, there is a somewhat new option called Open Table. That option is positioned at the bottom of the list. In my opinion, it would be more intuitive if the Properties option were at the bottom of this list instead of the Open Table option. That's what users like me are familiar with; it's been like that for decades, including in ArcMap. When I'm working quickly, I accidentally click Open Table instead of Properties because I expect Properties to be at the bottom of the list.
... View more
09-04-2024
05:53 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1240
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5; ArcGIS Online data: As a new ArcGIS Online user, it seems like the Catalog Pane > Portal tab contains more an just Portal data. It contains ArcGIS Online data too. Is there a reason why that tab is named "Portal" and not something more accurate/intuitive like "Portal & ArcGIS Online"?
... View more
09-03-2024
12:39 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1259
|
|
POST
|
Thanks @ChrisUnderwood. What is meant by the word "workspace" in this context? Is a different AGOL FC/table considered to be a different workspace? Standardized SQL functions in ArcGIS Online Standardized queries are not supported on joins between different workspaces. For example, are Table_1 and Table_2 different workspaces?
... View more
09-03-2024
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
998
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5 As discussed with @JonathanNeal in a separate message, I'm wondering if it would help to add a selection icon in GP tool descriptions in the Catalog Pane to indicate if the tool honors selections. For example, with the Join Field tool, if rows are selected in the join table via Select By Attributes, only those selected rows will be populated in the new fields in the Input table. Related use case: https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/1-m-join-to-pull-feature-with-specific-attribute/m-p/1533464/highlight/true#M45367 However, the Add Join tool does not work that way; selection are not honored. I'm aware that it's generally known that most geoprocessing tools honor selections unless otherwise specified. But there are exceptions, so I think it would be helpful to clarify this important difference between similar tools.
... View more
09-03-2024
11:44 AM
|
4
|
1
|
858
|
|
IDEA
|
It looks like mobile geodatabases aren't supported in ArcGIS Online. What can you add to ArcGIS Online? As far as I can tell, I would need to copy the mobile geodatabase data to a different filetype like a file geodatabase, and then zip the file geodatabase and upload it that way, which seems backwards. This is where GIS people get into trouble: too many copies of data. It would be great if ArcGIS Online could be enhanced so that we could upload data directly from a mobile geodatabase.
... View more
09-03-2024
11:24 AM
|
3
|
0
|
519
|
|
IDEA
|
https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/rest/services/Elevation/Ontario_DTM_LidarDerived/ImageServer ArcGIS Online > ArcGIS REST Services Directory > ImageServer > View In: There are several hyperlinks on that page—various methods to access the data. One of the links is an ArcMap link. As a novice who knows nothing about AGOL (or Portal?), why is there an ArcMap link, but not an ArcGIS Pro link? Should that page be enhanced so that there is a ArcGIS Pro option?
... View more
09-03-2024
05:04 AM
|
0
|
1
|
671
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03-20-2026 02:12 PM | |
| 1 | 03-19-2026 11:42 AM | |
| 1 | 06-03-2026 04:02 AM | |
| 1 | 03-18-2026 07:08 PM | |
| 2 | 4 weeks ago |