|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing that URL syntax. I gave that a shot but didn't get much. { "data": [], "meta": { "apiRoot": "http://hub.arcgis.com/api/v3/", "queryParameters": { "filter": { "orgId": "xxxxx", "isCancelled": "eventsEq(false)", "status": "not(private,draft,planned)", "endDate": "eventsBefore(1591307427179)" } }, "request": "http://hub.arcgis.com/api/v3/datasets?filter[orgId]=xxxxx", "resourceRoot": "http://hub.arcgis.com/api/v3/datasets", "stats": { "totalCount": 0, "count": 0, "aggs": {} }, "page": { "start": 1, "size": 10, "nextStart": -1 }, "took": 5, "total": 0, "datasetsMatching": { "onlySemanticFields": [], "onlyNonSemanticFields": [], "both": [] } }, "links": {} }
... View more
06-04-2020
03:41 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1640
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for your reply. I suppose I could parse the sitemap but was hoping to stick with json using an official api. I was using v2 to query for datasets. API Documentation (unofficial?) is here and here as revealed by Courtney Claessens way back in 2017. I suppose I could hack through http://gisdatacatalog-spokanecounty.opendata.arcgis.com/data.json but it isn't pretty. Patrick Hammons it looks like you might have an answer. How might I use v3 to get a json of my site's datasets? I see your gist at v3.md · GitHub but I' not sure how to use it to get info on my site. I don't see a siteid parameter in the docs. When I try this I get everything hosted by ESRI. Thanks for any help you can provide.
... View more
06-04-2020
09:05 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1640
|
|
POST
|
A workaround that might be a solution for you, assuming you store your data in MSSQL and have geometry shape type (vs sdebinary) is to use the Reduce method in a query layer. This worked for me. It it hard to say if it will eliminate every curve as it will return several types. You could tweak the tolerance if it didn't work the first time. Reduce() returns a LineString, CircularString, or CompoundCurve instance for CircularString instances. Reduce() returns either a CompoundCurve or LineString instance for CompoundCurve instances. Ideally you wouldn't need to do this. Hopefully a valid solution comes with 2.6.
... View more
06-03-2020
04:48 PM
|
0
|
0
|
411
|
|
POST
|
Hello- Were you given a bug number that you can share?
... View more
06-03-2020
04:25 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2788
|
|
POST
|
The json generated from the sites endpoint is an incomplete list of layers offered on our site. I'm seeing 4 layers when I should see 40. This problem started around April 19th. Graham Hudgins Thomas Hervey Endpoint: https://opendata.arcgis.com/api/sites/<id>/datasets.json Our page: Open Data Site
... View more
06-02-2020
04:34 PM
|
0
|
6
|
1745
|
|
POST
|
Apparently this has been fixed in 2.5. I have not tested. ENH-000124557 [Enhancement] Provide the ability to set the "supportsOptionalZone" property for a locator built with the Create Locator tool in ArcGIS Pro directly from the UI https://my.esri.com/#/support/bugs/ENH-000124557
... View more
05-28-2020
02:34 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2353
|
|
IDEA
|
Because ESRI is on the the Next Big Thing ArcGIS Experience Builder | Build, Deploy, and Manage GIS Web Apps
... View more
11-20-2019
09:02 AM
|
1
|
1
|
5400
|
|
POST
|
To Clarify: if you build the locator without zones Zone preference is simply not exposed in CreateLocator. This is not something a user can affect when running the tool. a property will automatically get added to your locator and set to true (supportsOptionalZone = true) When a locator is built the property is not written to the loc file in Pro at 2.4. Why would it need to be written to the file if it wasn't there already? The instruction would have been, in my case, to flip this to false. Instead I need to add the entire property to the file every time I build the locator. It is odd, and a bit frustrating, for these hidden properties to not be documented and available in the UI and arcpy. Thanks again.
... View more
08-15-2019
09:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2353
|
|
POST
|
Well, the answer back from Support is one that has been given since at least 10.1: Modify the loc file to include: supportsOptionalZone = true Manually editing a file is kludgy. I'd really like to see: Locator properties exposed in arcpy Locator properties exposed in the UI for Create Locator and Create Address Locator tools in ArcMap/Pro. Snickers bars mailed out to all the users that test new products extensively and version after version ask for the same enhancements/bug fixes. Thanks for your help Eric and Joe.
... View more
08-15-2019
09:11 AM
|
2
|
4
|
5374
|
|
POST
|
Hi Eric, thanks for your reply. I am publishing to ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7 via ArcGIS Pro 2.4. When searching via the geocode service, specifically findAddressCandidates, City appears to be required. When testing the locator that is published to Enterprise in Pro, the desired behavior is experienced: locator returns results when City is not passed.
... View more
08-13-2019
10:38 AM
|
0
|
8
|
3021
|
|
POST
|
That is correct. And yes, city is the distinguishing data point. My issue is that it appears to be a required field. If I submit a valid address without City no matches are returned....even when the tolerance is dropped very low. I'm not sure how the suggestions would help if my locator is not built with City. Premium support ticket time!
... View more
08-13-2019
08:48 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3021
|
|
POST
|
I suppose removing City from the logic is a reasonable workaround for a small set of addresses. However, I'm trying to serve 200k addresses in various jurisdictions with matching street names. I want my locator to distinguish between cities, but I don't want this to be a required entry. Thanks again for your input.
... View more
08-12-2019
03:52 PM
|
0
|
3
|
3021
|
|
POST
|
I can replicate this issue with a ArcGIS Pro 2.4 Composite locator published to ArcGIS Server 10.7. MagicKey functionality on 10.3.1 server composite locator returns correct results.
... View more
08-12-2019
03:35 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3251
|
|
POST
|
Hi Joe, thanks for your reply. I am using the Create Locator tool in ArcGIS Pro 2.4. I had tested 'Match out of range' set to Yes and No with no positive result. I'd expect a user to be able to pass a simple address, without sending a city.
... View more
08-12-2019
03:11 PM
|
0
|
5
|
3021
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 07-06-2022 02:52 PM | |
| 1 | 07-27-2023 10:51 AM | |
| 2 | 11-14-2023 08:48 AM | |
| 1 | 10-27-2021 11:50 AM | |
| 2 | 12-11-2023 04:10 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-29-2024
11:30 AM
|