Latest Contributions by RPGIS

I am not sure because we use attribute rules to dictate a lot of the editing behavior. It may automatically populate but I cannot be certain of that. In any case you may want to consider using an attribute rule just to be on the safe side. ... View more

Hi @aam, So to answer your questions: Yes, you can append data to the related table using information from the parent table. We have attribute rules that do this automatically for our inspections. You can use any kind of id but you must make certain that the field data types are the same and the primary key fields in both tables are of similar size. So yes you can use GlobalIDs. Just make sure the related table has a separate globalid field that isn't auto-populated. Yes - Must be a global id When you append and you field match accordingly it will match automatically. You do not want the related table to populate automatically because your relationship will not work. The relationship is looking for identical values so if they are different then it will not work. ... View more

Hi @yockee, I don't typically use validation rules simply because the workflows that we have generally will account for all the edits that come in from the field. Typically validation is mostly for verifying that the data that is entered meets a certain criteria. It is usually best to create calculations that will account for certain things rather than try and force the editor to fill in the information. The solutions that we have created automatically account for certain behaviors and so there isn't a need to for validation. The other thing is if you are concerned with certain types of edits then you could try and create a constraint rule instead. The benefit of a constraint rule is that you can customize messages will appear to the editors and letting them know what needs to be corrected in order to continue editing. ... View more

There is but it may require some knowledge of either arcade or python in order to find unsnapped points. The other thing to try is to set a location filter for all the points and finding the nearest line where the distance is greater than 0. ... View more

Hi @Jennifer_Parmeley, To Clarify, just so others can get a better understanding of what you mean, do you mean to add the ability to freeze fields so users can still see the fields as they scroll. The other slight workaround is to zoom out of the webpage but that will result in the text shrinking throughout. I think the ability to freeze fields/column headers would be a more straightforward improvement. ... View more

So there might be a few things that can be tested. Create a hosted view that is updated in field maps but has a filter set in the map to only display certain values. This should restrict the editing of the related record You can simply filter out the table values so that they are only visible in Survey123 but not in field maps Append a value to the related table such as a text field with attributes stating "survey" and have it so that it does not display in field maps when you set the visibility fields to look for fields that don't have that value.   ... View more

The only thing I can think of is to create an expression that concatenates and modifies the html at the same time. Something like: var C = ['• SomeValue','• SomeValue','• SomeValue'] return Concatenate(C,'/n') in addition to the html element. Something that may be doable but I have yet to test this fully. ... View more

So that is a fairly simple and straightforward method but it does have a strange workaround. Basically you would simply need to set a pre filtered field to only show the actively edited features. If you need further guidance in pretty sure others in the community have also handled this as well. ... View more

Hi @SanchezNuñez, Then you could try to deconstruct the network temporarily, though that might be inadvisable, make the change and then rebuild it. I have not constructed a utility network myself but if that is a known issue then that might be the only option. Here is something I found akin to your situation. Editing the Utility Network Schema for an Existing... - Esri Community  ... View more

Have you tried creating a replica schema to see if that will work? I have not used those myself but based on what I have read it will create a local copy of the exact features you need. Whether or not that will work for you is unknown but you could give that a try. ... View more

Hi @MitchHolley1, Have you tried running the generate schema report in pro. I typically use that when identifying changes between test and production databases.   ... View more

Hi @JoseSanchez, Have you looked into using the Table to Domain Tool in ArcGIS Pro. If you modify a domain of one value but wish to update both code and description then you can use this tool. You can also simply use one field for both the code and description values of a domain. Ideally if one sets of codes/descriptions are dependent on another set of values then this tool might be the easiest. However, if there are only small changes, then it might be best to simply modify the codes and descriptions manually. ... View more

Hi @kyankraehenbuehllaixoversumchK, First, please use the code function when pasting any type of code, otherwise it makes it difficult to troubleshoot your issue. //Field: “Bestand Werte kopieren” (Copy Existing Values) //Editing Expression: if (IsEmpty($feature.BAUWERK_REF) || $feature.BESTAND_WERTE_KOPIEREN == 1) { return false } else { var relatedFeatures = FeatureSetByRelationshipName( $feature, "ABWASSER_MASTER_OWNER.ABW_BESTAND_BAUWERK", ['BEZEICHNUNG'] ); var firstFeature = First(relatedFeatures); return ( $feature.BEZEICHNUNG != firstFeature.BEZEICHNUNG ); } //Calculated Expression: return 2 //Field: “Bezeichnung” (Label/Name) //Calculated Expression: if (IsEmpty($feature.BAUWERK_REF)) { return $feature.BEZEICHNUNG } else { var relatedFeatures = FeatureSetByRelationshipName( $feature, "ABWASSER_MASTER_OWNER.ABW_BESTAND_BAUWERK", ['BEZEICHNUNG'] ) var firstFeature = First(relatedFeatures) return firstFeature.BEZEICHNUNG } //Editing Expression: //DomainName($feature, "BESTAND_WERTE_KOPIEREN") == "Werte aus Bestand kopieren"   Secondly, are these calculations used in the same field calculation or are these two different fields with similar calculations. Depending on which then here is perhaps a better approach. Assuming these are the same field. ... View more