|
POST
|
I'm using the Export Tile Cache tool in ArcToolbox to create a TPK file which is then sideloaded into Collector iOS using the methodology described here: http://doc.arcgis.com/en/collector/ios/collect-data/offline-use.htm All this is working fine but I noticed that when using the Manage functionality within Collector to look at the TPKs that it shows a default thumbnail for each item. It would be quite useful if each TPK could have a custom thumbnail image to help users distinguish between the different offline basemaps. If I poke around in the TPK file on a PC then I can see that there is potentially provision within the esriinfo\iteminfo.xml file for a thumbnail e.g. <thumbnail>thumbnail/thumbnail.png</thumbnail> but there doesn't seem to be any kind of workflow that I can find to actually set this to a custom image. It's really not a major problem but thought I'd post just in case anyone else had cracked this particular nut. Thanks Gareth
... View more
03-23-2018
08:41 AM
|
0
|
1
|
903
|
|
POST
|
I found that pressing cancel on the installation and then saying no when asked if you're sure that you want to cancel brought it back to life and the progress bar actually started moving. This was after having left it for at least an hour and a half so will try that trick sooner if it happens again.
... View more
01-24-2018
01:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2321
|
|
POST
|
I'm having exactly the same issue on an install of 10.2.1 on Windows 7. It has supposedly been writing the system registry values for about an hour! Not tried the registry size fix yet. Did you ever get yours installed?
... View more
01-18-2018
08:43 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2321
|
|
IDEA
|
Add the ability as Portal administrators for restrict the types of content that users can create. In effect this would be splitting the Content > Create, edit and delete privilege in the roles to different types of content such as web maps, layers, apps (which might be further split into Story Maps, templates, web app builder etc). The reasoning behind this is that we only want users to be able to use properly managed, authoritative apps built by the GIS team to meet a specific business requirement. Similarly we'd also prefer them to only use authoritative data layers that we've uploaded to avoid multiple copies of datasets popping up across the Portal. We've been running our Portal for about six months with a small number of core apps for users to consume and we've restricted user roles to not allow any content creation. We're getting close to rolling out more functionality starting with the ability for users to add corporate layers into the map viewer and then save and share their own web maps. There doesn't currently appear to be a way of doing this without opening up the ability to also create apps and upload their own data. There may well be future use cases where we're happy for them to do this but for now it's almost as if Portal offers too much advanced functionality for our users - we have to support and document all of this, how do you explain that there is this option to create different types of app but we'd actually prefer it if you don't use it?! The best we can probably come up with for now is to restrict sharing of content only to certain groups (rather than organisation wide) and then do some kind of regular trawl through users' content directories to remove any items which are applications possibly using the Python API.
... View more
01-17-2018
07:05 AM
|
26
|
6
|
2909
|
|
IDEA
|
Add the ability as Portal administrators for restrict the types of content that users can create. In effect this would be splitting the Content > Create, edit and delete privilege in the roles to different types of content such as web maps, layers, apps (which might be further split into Story Maps, templates, web app builder etc). The reasoning behind this is that we only want users to be able to use properly managed, authoritative apps built by the GIS team to meet a specific business requirement. Similarly we'd also prefer them to only use authoritative data layers that we've uploaded to avoid multiple copies of datasets popping up across the Portal. We've been running our Portal for about six months with a small number of core apps for users to consume and we've restricted user roles to not allow any content creation. We're getting close to rolling out more functionality starting with the ability for users to add corporate layers into the map viewer and then save and share their own web maps. There doesn't currently appear to be a way of doing this without opening up the ability to also create apps and upload their own data. There may well be future use cases where we're happy for them to do this but for now it's almost as if Portal offers too much advanced functionality for our users - we have to support and document all of this, how do you explain that there is this option to create different types of app but we'd actually prefer it if you don't use it?! The best we can probably come up with for now is to restrict sharing of content only to certain groups (rather than organisation wide) and then do some kind of regular trawl through users' content directories to remove any items which are applications possibly using the Python API.
... View more
01-17-2018
07:05 AM
|
25
|
6
|
2633
|
|
IDEA
|
Two relatively simple things which I believe would significantly increase the usability of this template: Be able to specify which layers from my web map are included in the summary panel. At the moment it just assumes that you want to be able to show results for every layer in the map, whereas some of them such as a boundary layer are really only there as a visual reference so I'd like them to be drawn at all times. Allow the option for the buffer distance to be consistent across all layers. At the moment if a user adjusts the search distance for the first layer, it resets back to the default once they move on to the next layer. They have to keep resetting the distance for each new layer that they look at. I'd like the user to be able to set it once and then be automatically applied to all layers.
... View more
01-05-2018
03:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
820
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the response Jeffrey. I was actually (slightly randomly) looking at the scale in Arcade as a way of displaying the map scale to the user - I thought I could have a very large transparent polygon that covered my map extent and was labelled with the scale value. This is because the scalebar widget in Web App Builder doesn't have an option to show the scale as text, which is something that our Portal users tell us that they want to see. I thought the Arcade option might be quicker than trying to write a custom widget but it doesn't look like it is an option in this case. However I could also potentially see a scenario where someone might want to adjust the label string at smaller scales e.g. abbreviate Street to St or maybe choose not to show a particular label if it was over a certain number of characters.
... View more
11-15-2017
01:00 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3038
|
|
POST
|
I'd like to be able to include the current map scale in the labels for a feature in Portal 10.5.1. The documentation on this page suggests that only the feature to be labelled is available as a global variable in Arcade expression https://developers.arcgis.com/arcade/guide/profiles/#labelling However within the playground section on the same site the current map scale is available under the labelling profile If I try to use the map scale global in an Arcade label expression on a layer in a Portal 10.5.1 web map I get an error about the view identifier not being found. I'm guessing that the reason it works in the playground is that the page is built with the JS API and that has a slightly different implementation of Arcade than Portal 10.5.1 perhaps? My question is will the map scale global be available in later versions of Portal?
... View more
11-13-2017
03:06 AM
|
2
|
5
|
3846
|
|
BLOG
|
Any plans to offer improved barcode scanning functionality in the same way that Survey123 does?
... View more
11-09-2017
04:58 AM
|
1
|
0
|
18046
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the speedy reply Joel. That makes a bit more sense to me now. There are actually about four or five geocoders that it would be useful to use in Explorer so it would be good to be able to allow more than just the one. I guess we could build a composite locator which wraps up all the others but I think for now we can make it work with a combination of feature search and the top geocoder.
... View more
10-20-2017
08:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
833
|
|
POST
|
From what I can tell the only options for searching in Explorer are to use the pre-configured ESRI world geocoder or set up searching on layers in the web map. Are there any plans to enable us to bring in geocoder services that are configured in our Portal/ArcGIS Enterprise?
... View more
10-20-2017
08:12 AM
|
0
|
2
|
912
|
|
POST
|
This may or may not be relevant but it looks from the connection that you're using in your screenshot that you're publishing a traditional map service with feature access enabled directly to the ArcGIS Server site behind Portal. In Tiffany's screenshot she is publishing a hosted feature layer (indicated by the My Hosted Services string in the connection) directly to the Portal. The workflow for doing this is described here and is slightly different from the way you are doing it as it involved signing in to Portal within ArcMap - it took me a while to get my head around this. http://server.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/use/publish-features.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_94021BE7D875474681DAD20D05A90AF6 I'm not saying this will necessarily fix your issue with Collector but it might explain why you're not seeing the editing settings in the Portal content item for that service. I think that there are additional criteria that need to be met for your feature service in order to be able to use in Collector. Hope that helps a bit Gareth
... View more
10-13-2017
01:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
758
|
|
POST
|
I seem to be able to tap on points in the iOS version without any problems. Same web map on an Android device and I need about 50 attempts to get the precise location of the point - very frustrating! Seems ok on lines in Android though.
... View more
10-09-2017
09:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
505
|
|
POST
|
We're about to launch an internal Portal site with a couple of main apps that we want to direct initial users towards. We're keeping what they can do on the site down to a bare minimum and will roll out more of the Portal functionality over time. One behaviour that we've just noticed is when searching for content with a phrase such as "esri" - which returns 645 items - see attached screenshot. It looks as if the search is returning a lot of internal items such as regional variations for each of the different Story Map templates. When you click on the content owner these appear to be some sort of internal ghost accounts rather than Portal members. I know the likelihood of users searching on something like esri is probably quite low but we'd prefer it if these items didn't get returned at all in any searches and instead only content that we'd approved via the standard sharing mechanisms were shown. There is an option to exclude some system users from the results of searches in the advanced Portal options config file at <Portal for ArcGIS installation directory>\customizations\<version number>\webapps\arcgis#home\js\esri\arcgisonline\config.js http://server.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/administer/windows/configure-a-disconnected-deployment.htm However it only seems to be effective with the five system accounts listed below. systemUsers: ["esri_nav","system_publisher", "esri_livingatlas", "esri_boundaries", "esri_demographics"], // on-premise Portal list of system users to filter out of user searches If we try adding one of the regional Story Map owner accounts such as esri_et and then restart the Portal it doesn't make any difference and their content still appears. I suspect that it is something to with the fact that if we list all Portal users via the ArcGIS API for Python we only see those five system accounts and not the regional ones. If I try to change the sharing on one of the items so that they aren't visible to general users then I only get the option to share with groups that I own (even as an admin) rather than the Everyone and Portal options that you get with "normal" Portal content items. Is there another way to get around this such as deleting the regional templates from the Portal apps directory? Regards Gareth
... View more
08-04-2017
02:10 AM
|
1
|
3
|
3134
|
|
POST
|
I've successfully used the Python API to add a non-secure map service from a non-federated ArcGIS Server site (10.2.2) to a Portal (10.5.1). However if I turn security on for the map service then there doesn't seem to be an option in the API reference that allows me to specify credentials. It will still go ahead and add the service as a Portal content item but then when you try to load the layer into the Portal map viewer it prompts for the credentials (strangely the layers from the service are already loaded and drawn in the background before anything is entered in the credentials box). Is there a way via the API to save the security credentials for the service within the content item in the same way that you can if you add the same service in manually? Thanks Gareth
... View more
07-21-2017
07:26 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1227
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10-01-2025 05:16 AM | |
| 1 | 12-22-2022 07:49 AM | |
| 1 | 09-23-2021 06:26 AM | |
| 1 | 09-23-2021 02:49 AM | |
| 1 | 09-26-2024 08:33 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Monday
|