IDEA
|
When attempting to get a simple record count on 500+ processed features the GET COUNT tool works great as a quicker version of the SUMMERIZE tool, however it does not allow for a simple output to a table or a text file. I assume that through major gyrations of a combo of tools, this can be made this happen but I at this point have found a half work around. After the tools completion, I copy the results from the detail history pane into a text editor, delete the top few lines until I can run a macro that leaves me with: filename.dbf count: 1000000 run a macro to bring the count onto the same line as the filename: filename.dbf count: 1000000 and it’s ready to bring into Excel using the “:” as a delimiter. Admittedly I don’t know much python however I assume this all can be accomplished with a couple lines of code. Keep in mind my processed features each have thousands to millions of records so the summarize tool takes "forever" vs my workaround takes 5 minutes. So, I think a count output to table or text at the completion of the GET COUNT Tool is an idea whose time has come.
... View more
11-15-2019
03:03 PM
|
2
|
1
|
1301
|
POST
|
Here Here for the old and dusty AV3, for attribute table joining, querying, calculating etc. it has no competitors..... Millions of records? No problem....except for the darn 2gb limit! 😞
... View more
11-12-2019
09:51 AM
|
7
|
2
|
1837
|
POST
|
I would agree generally with what Jamal means. If you create an Arc10 mxd file with all the network connections, layers, layouts, settings etc. and then import the map file into Pro and save out, then reopen both software’s concurrently and try to do the basic same things, most clickable tasks take longer to activate in Pro. The Catalog pane in Arc10 is lightyears quicker to use. I’ve become used to the delay as a fact of life and now use Pro for most of the processing (it is faster) that I do, but IMO the lag time waiting for tools to load, menus to refresh, options to become clickable are a drag on productivity. However apparently, it’s the future we're living with for now. .
... View more
11-01-2019
02:14 PM
|
17
|
2
|
2050
|
POST
|
I'm not sure what if I'm doing is what your doing, but this is working?......
... View more
10-15-2019
10:39 AM
|
0
|
5
|
3191
|
POST
|
I'm looking to way export a shapefile table out to a pipe delimited format. is this possible?
... View more
08-14-2019
11:54 AM
|
0
|
4
|
780
|
POST
|
I find the easiest way is to create a startup project that I use that has all of my geo, tools, links and folders loaded. I then remove any stuff I dont need or want for whatever project I'm doing. that way all my stuff is there everytime.
... View more
08-01-2019
07:32 AM
|
1
|
0
|
959
|
POST
|
Close to what Im looking for, I'll make it work, Thanks!
... View more
06-21-2019
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1123
|
POST
|
Ok maybe I'm the idiot this morning, but inArcGIS Pro, how do I get my Layout to update its view to match my panning in the Data map view? in Arcmap10x, it automaticly(the Layout) reflects the new geographic view that I've panned to in my Dataview. am I missing a link layout to dataview setting? I know I can delete my layout map frame and add a new one which will reflect my current view in the data frame but I really just want to pan to various places(in the dataview)frame, save a bookmark, print the layout, pan, save, print, etc in the dataview. it's a simple thing that Im missing right? Thanks Brian
... View more
06-21-2019
09:46 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1182
|
POST
|
Hi All At the end of a geoprocess, I have 25+ shapefiles with various large record counts. I would like to be able to get a quick listing of said counts (with filename for reference) into a database or csv for verification of what I am expecting during the processing. I looked at Get Count, but I don’t understand how to get the results into a table that I can look at outside of ArcMap. Preferably I would like to run it as a model or tool and the end of my processing and spit it out in the same place as my output shapefiles. any help is appreciated Thanks Brian
... View more
01-15-2019
03:40 PM
|
1
|
8
|
2987
|
POST
|
I’ve found that if I move all my shp's & dbfs into the Gdb environment, they get indexed in a way that Pro likes. By taking the time to index all datasets (spatially and attributes) within a Gbd I’m able to utilize an increase in performance. A rudimental example would be in a zip+9 dataset of 60 million records, a query selection of zip code 55401 in a gdb takes 0.14 seconds. In a shp which obviously couldn’t hold that much data due to the 2gig limit, querying 55401 for a shp table of 1.5 million records takes 8.15 seconds. It's a basic sample but it is what it is. While we haven’t gone all in on Pro, it appears that if all your data is indexed within a Gdb, most processes are very fast compared to non Gdb datasets. Note that we're using mostly vector datasets, so I can't speak to raster data. However, working with data output from Gdb to a non Gdb format, remains problematic for the moment, but with further experience, we're hopeful in overcoming those issues in the future.
... View more
07-19-2018
12:31 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1504
|
POST
|
Hi All I'm looking for what I believe is a very simple process, but my brain block is getting in the way of my solution. I would like to merge counties from a gdb filled with 2015 US Census County features into individual State features based on the State fips field within each county feature, i.e. 01,02,04 etc. into individual state features 01_counties, 02_counties etc. I realize I can do this 54 times using geoprocessing tools, but I would like to do this in model builder so as to be able to use this process tool for future use with different variables. I assume I can Iterate through the gdb to parse out or group by filename state fips and merge into new state files. each feature has a st fips as part of its filename i.e. tl_2015_60010_counties, tl_2015_60010_counties, tl_2015_60010_counties tl_2015_69085_counties, tl_2015_69100_counties, tl_2015_69110_counties, tl_2015_69120_counties tl_2015_78010_counties, tl_2015_78020_counties, tl_2015_78030_counties into state features: tl_2015_60_counties tl_2015_69_counties tl_2015_78_counties Ultimately, I’m looking to merge files based on a like portion of the filename via model builder. I’m sure it’s right in front of me but its Monday so I’m temporarily blind! I understand Iteration tools, but the maybe collect values? I don’t understand if that fits into my question or not. Thanks for any help Brian.
... View more
06-18-2018
10:29 AM
|
0
|
1
|
436
|
POST
|
Understood Kory, No Prob, the GP tool works for now, Thanks Again!
... View more
12-06-2017
08:42 AM
|
1
|
0
|
719
|
POST
|
Nice, exactly what Im looking for, but then the "Bug" bites me! Its all greyed out? what am I missing? How do I add the new field? help?
... View more
12-05-2017
12:53 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2515
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 11-30-2017 09:21 AM | |
1 | 01-20-2017 09:52 AM | |
1 | 07-19-2018 12:31 PM | |
1 | 08-01-2019 07:32 AM | |
15 | 09-10-2020 10:47 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-19-2024
12:12 AM
|